GB Airways
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GB Airways
Just a quick post to warn anyone thats thinking about joining GB Airways to be sure before you do. Regardless about what any of the staff say, its not a nice airline to work for. Most of the crew really dont want to be there but find that they are unable to leave because they are bonded for a year and would have to pay £600 if they leave. The only crew that like it are the ones that think they are BA Crew but really just work for a cheap tacky low cost airline that have to use the identity if another airline because they would never survive alone.
you are much better off working for easyjet or one of the charters where the working conditions are much better and the monney is a lot better.
you are much better off working for easyjet or one of the charters where the working conditions are much better and the monney is a lot better.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: london
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, i stayed only 6 months at GB (that was before the bond thing) because i did not enjoy it. They work hard but i work even harder now so it's not so much the problem.
The problem has to do with money. LGW crew get crap money and it's difficlut to survive with this kind of salary when living in London (plus the commuting).
People are not over friendly and as you have said, the ones who think who work for BA are the worst.
However, i dont think it is a low cost and the service (well that was 2 years ago) was quite good, passengers were usually quite happy with the service.
I think GB is good as a stepping stone but hardly as a career.
The positive thing with GB is that roster disruption is rare and crewing has still a human face.
The problem has to do with money. LGW crew get crap money and it's difficlut to survive with this kind of salary when living in London (plus the commuting).
People are not over friendly and as you have said, the ones who think who work for BA are the worst.
However, i dont think it is a low cost and the service (well that was 2 years ago) was quite good, passengers were usually quite happy with the service.
I think GB is good as a stepping stone but hardly as a career.
The positive thing with GB is that roster disruption is rare and crewing has still a human face.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: N/A
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a passenger, what I don't understand is how I hear that GB are such a bad company to work for, yet when I travel with them the crew are brilliant and the product offered is by far better than mainline BA.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EGKK
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GB Airways
GB Airways obviously isn't the best airline to work for, but some of the benefits (BA Concessions) are great. Pay is slighty below average, but the worse aspect is that the staff in the office has gone downhill... Crewing rely on favours due to staff shortage, but will not return these favours to you, apart from the fact that you receive apauling arrogant treatment should you reporting unwell for a flying duty. all this as mentioned previously, due to staff shortage. There is absolutely no recognition towards seniority, and should you decide to initiate a career within this airline, you'll soon feel used and undervalued as they don't recognise your efforts when you decide to apply for promotion. (very false impression within that office).
Therefore, most of the staff working there are very professional, and as you can read in this thread, should you fly with GB, you'll receive good treatment from the crew....but the airline can't keep their valued crew. High turnover of staff ! Rosters are busy with over 90 Block hours per month during the busy summer, but must admit, crew are really friendly within the airline, and you usually have nice days out.
Therefore, most of the staff working there are very professional, and as you can read in this thread, should you fly with GB, you'll receive good treatment from the crew....but the airline can't keep their valued crew. High turnover of staff ! Rosters are busy with over 90 Block hours per month during the busy summer, but must admit, crew are really friendly within the airline, and you usually have nice days out.
Guest
Posts: n/a
hey LGWcrew you say that easyJet are better to work for, have you ever worked for easy? True the money is good, but you are treated like a slave. The crew at easy are great! shame about the company and management in luton though its getting worse and worse and Im glad I jumped ship!
ILS26L said about 90 hours in summer which is not bad at all when at easyJet you could easly do around 130+ hours/month and well over 60 sectors a month.
ILS26L said about 90 hours in summer which is not bad at all when at easyJet you could easly do around 130+ hours/month and well over 60 sectors a month.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Storm_Animal.. I work for easyJet up north and I think I've only ever had one roster, with 6o sectors on, in the whole four years I've been there. I've been in aviation for over 15 years and I have to say that there have been alot worse companies to work for. I know it's no excuse, but the managers at easyJet are pretty much the same as any other airline. I think you'll find & in alot of cases, they're actually better than most. I couldn't go and work for another shorthaul airline & earn the sort of money I'm on now (apart from 'Airways') As I always say, it's 'horses for courses' depending on which airline you work for.. But remember 'The Futures Bright, The Futures Orange' 
Guest
Posts: n/a
hey paul..!
yeah I know other bases especially regional ones are very good at easyJet. Although LGW is very very bad, its undercrewed, there are so many crew who are grounded becasue they have reached their 900 hours per year max and as a result they are working many crew who are not near the 900 hours mark to death with constant minimum rest and 6 x 4 sector days.
yeah I know other bases especially regional ones are very good at easyJet. Although LGW is very very bad, its undercrewed, there are so many crew who are grounded becasue they have reached their 900 hours per year max and as a result they are working many crew who are not near the 900 hours mark to death with constant minimum rest and 6 x 4 sector days.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EGKK
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OZ...
Hey Oz..,
If what you clainm is correct, you could only fly 7,5 months before you reached you maximum authorised 900 hours. So basically, you'd have 7.5 tough months and then 4,5 months of standby's!! That would suit me !
The main problem with GB is just the mentality of the people working in that office. The only base supervisor with a bit of sense between her ears is off the a new base. Crew needs are constantly ignored and morale is definitly low due to the poor working conditions. When crew approach the managers offering ideas and solutions in order to increase morale without incurring extra expenses, they are dismissed right away and simply ignored. And it just seems that the airline does it on purpose to go that extra mile to upset and deteriote the morale by deducting discrepencies from the duty free from the crew's pay, not recognising exceptional work and when crew go beyond their call of duty.
I am a strong believer that if you are in an excellent working environment and you feel valued, respected and listened too, morale would definitly increase.
If what you clainm is correct, you could only fly 7,5 months before you reached you maximum authorised 900 hours. So basically, you'd have 7.5 tough months and then 4,5 months of standby's!! That would suit me !
The main problem with GB is just the mentality of the people working in that office. The only base supervisor with a bit of sense between her ears is off the a new base. Crew needs are constantly ignored and morale is definitly low due to the poor working conditions. When crew approach the managers offering ideas and solutions in order to increase morale without incurring extra expenses, they are dismissed right away and simply ignored. And it just seems that the airline does it on purpose to go that extra mile to upset and deteriote the morale by deducting discrepencies from the duty free from the crew's pay, not recognising exceptional work and when crew go beyond their call of duty.
I am a strong believer that if you are in an excellent working environment and you feel valued, respected and listened too, morale would definitly increase.
