Vistajet Future
Whats going on with Vistajet hiring and do they still do that 17/13 schedule for pilots or has that changed now?
I heard they are getting quite desperate for crews as well....anybody with current info? |
The salary is attractive pretty much only for Austrians, due to a tax loophole, otherwise for the amount of work you have to do the money is pretty bad. |
Schedule
Originally Posted by dirk85
(Post 10349366)
The salary is attractive pretty much only for Austrians, due to a tax loophole, otherwise for the amount of work you have to do the money is pretty bad. |
13 days OFF. Is that really OFF? or do they still schedule recurrent training on these days? LPC/OPC DGR CRM etcetc |
Off Days
Originally Posted by SanHor
(Post 10349795)
13 days OFF. Is that really OFF? or do they still schedule recurrent training on these days? LPC/OPC DGR CRM etcetc |
I think all your leave has to be taken in those off days in addition to all training. |
Unfortunately I think the Austrians and to a much greater extent the Deutschers are in a state of denial about the future, and I don't just mean in aviation...
|
Vistajet changes
Originally Posted by Private jet
(Post 10349953)
Unfortunately I think the Austrians and to a much greater extent the Deutschers are in a state of denial about the future, and I don't just mean in aviation...
I am not 100% sure on this but apparently positioning flights to and from the aircraft back home are all economy class and the hotels are not that great either. I would be very interested to see how they go over the next 12 months. |
Hello!
Originally Posted by Private jet
(Post 10349953)
Unfortunately I think the Austrians and to a much greater extent the Deutschers are in a state of denial about the future, and I don't just mean in aviation...
|
12 months
Originally Posted by what next
(Post 10350512)
Hello!
Looking ahead with a fair amount of skepticism and always having a plan B on hand is not the worst of strategies.And regarding the original question: A 17/13 roster combined with less-than-stellar pay is certainly not very appealing in times like these where airline jobs can be found around every corner. I would like to ask some former colleagues who went to that company for more details but they have already left... |
Originally Posted by Daddy Fantastic
(Post 10350729)
Bar the economy tanking it, I would be very surprised if these guys can operate the way they are at present in 12 months time. Lots will go to airlines for a lot more money and far better schedules, as I said most have families and wont do 17 on 13 off for rubbish pay.
|
Next 12 months
Originally Posted by what next
(Post 10350748)
Yes. But don't forget that we have the current situation since only about a year. Before that, the few airline jobs to be found were mostly pay-to-fly and with minimum-rest rosters which are no more family friendly than 17/13. At least Vistajet always hired people during those bad years and paid them something instead of taking money. Will be interesting to see what they (and many other bizjet operations) will come up with to keep their crews from running away.
|
Originally Posted by Private jet
(Post 10349953)
Unfortunately I think the Austrians and to a much greater extent the Deutschers are in a state of denial about the future, and I don't just mean in aviation...
Care to explain what you mean ? |
Originally Posted by Daddy Fantastic
(Post 10350828)
I agree with what you said but ultimately just like a business a pilot will always do what is in their own best interest with regards to jobs and money. Something will have to give and I suspect it will be Vistajet and not the flight crew who will be forced into a change.
|
Originally Posted by His dudeness
(Post 10351462)
You think ? I think there are more than enough people on the market who will except ANYTHING just to fly a bigger airplane etcetc. The small operators are more and more a thing of the past and thus available jobs who suit individuals are getting less. Fit into the Vista or NetJets scheme - as an example - or donīt fly executive. Period.
Corporate flying is usually a lifestyle thing for a lot of flight crew. If you want stability then airlines are far better for you. |
Originally Posted by Daddy Fantastic
(Post 10351647)
If you want stability then airlines are far better for you. |
Originally Posted by Daddy Fantastic
(Post 10351647)
if its bigger planes to fly like you said then airlines are the way to go...
|
Yes, rosters at Netjets are rock-solid. If you do not agree to extend or show a day early (for extra-$$$) then you just don't that and they will look for someone else on the fleet. In this sense we are the "airline amongst business jet operators". I personally would not go for another business jet operator outside Netjets, I'd swallow the bitter pill of going back to the airlines, if I had to leave. Exception: find a great private owner who genuinely takes care of his crew: then you get good money and you make your own roster, you pick your own hotels etc.. There are not too many around and you mainly get those jobs through connections.
At the moment I would NOT change company, the next economic downturn is around the corner and quite a few operators/airliners will not survive it. |
Netjets
Originally Posted by EatMyShorts!
(Post 10351685)
Yes, rosters at Netjets are rock-solid. If you do not agree to extend or show a day early (for extra-$$$) then you just don't that and they will look for someone else on the fleet. In this sense we are the "airline amongst business jet operators". I personally would not go for another business jet operator outside Netjets, I'd swallow the bitter pill of going back to the airlines, if I had to leave. Exception: find a great private owner who genuinely takes care of his crew: then you get good money and you make your own roster, you pick your own hotels etc.. There are not too many around and you mainly get those jobs through connections.
At the moment I would NOT change company, the next economic downturn is around the corner and quite a few operators/airliners will not survive it. I dont really care about equipment and the latest glass cockpit etc but if I did go corporate I would want something no smaller than a Challenger 300/604/605 etc. Dont want a mickey mouse phenom 100 after flying on jets all above 40 up to 93 tons. Vistajet I think will either have to make some radical changes or find themselves in a lot of trouble. |
Originally Posted by Daddy Fantastic
(Post 10351857)
On the flip side of that coin look what NJ did to their flight crews after 2008 crash, it was not pretty and hiring stagnated for years. In saying that I would rather be at NJ than Vistajet and if I could get a corporate job (PIC or very quick upgrade) with good pay and a 5 on 5 off schedule for example I would leave my airline job in a heartbeat.
I dont really care about equipment and the latest glass cockpit etc but if I did go corporate I would want something no smaller than a Challenger 300/604/605 etc. Dont want a mickey mouse phenom 100 after flying on jets all above 40 up to 93 tons. Vistajet I think will either have to make some radical changes or find themselves in a lot of trouble. All the cost saving options were exactly that - optional. Initially went on Job Share (4yrs program alternating with year on / year off while on 60% salary throughout). My rating was renewed just before year off and I found an 11 month contract on the same type so got 2 salaries and continued with all the NJE benefits and protection from any compulsory redundancy for the 4 years. Then about 18 months in to the above, they dangled an attractive carrot for voluntary redundancy with 15 months full salary + 3 months for every year of service. Show me a company who treated their pilots better during the hard times and I will be impressed. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.