PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. (https://www.pprune.org/biz-jets-ag-flying-ga-etc-36/)
-   -   Tesco's new G550 Registration (https://www.pprune.org/biz-jets-ag-flying-ga-etc/548782-tescos-new-g550-registration.html)

SpoolingUp 5th Oct 2014 06:18

Tesco's new G550 Registration
 
Tesco's new G550 registration - G-LSCW GINFO Search Results | Aircraft Register | Operations and Safety - G-LSCW ? FlightAware.

Is it me or is there some sublime messaging going on here. Unless I am mistaken, Those letters stand for Lidl, Sainsburys, Co-Op & Waitrose? Why no 'A' for Aldi?

I don't know, Just a thought, surely someone must have thought about it?

First.officer 5th Oct 2014 07:43

According to a news report I read somewhere the other day, they're in the process of selling all the aircraft off??!!!

F/o

ShyTorque 5th Oct 2014 08:01

It might stand for Let's Screw Customers Weekly.

SpoolingUp 5th Oct 2014 08:02

Indeed - and sadly it means more people will lose their jobs through no fault of their own. Just the perfect storm of Profit Warnings and an aircraft that was purchased sometime ago, being delivered at a completely inopportune moment!

mixture 5th Oct 2014 09:51


an aircraft that was purchased sometime ago, being delivered at a completely inopportune moment!
An aircraft that should not have been ordered in the first place !

Nothing more than a boys toy for the directors !

65-70% of their revenues come from the UK, they've dumped their US & Japanese ventures and scaled back in China, so for what's left of their international ops they can jolly well take commercial flights !

SpoolingUp 5th Oct 2014 15:23

There seems to be a little bit of bourgeois bickering here. My original post was a little cheap humourous jibe. I'm all for more jets for the big Corporations because it means more jobs for the likes of those who frequent this website.

If you 'Wat Tyler' disagree with the likes of Tesco having Company Jets, then go and buy some of their shares now whilst they are plummeting, or perhaps wait another month or so. You can then turn up to the shareholders meetings and influence the Board's decisions. Tesco's will recover in time and you'll make money on your shares, you might even get to fly for them one day when they are successful and prosperous again (probably on a chartered aircraft - I admit) - but what's wrong with that?

Anyway, what I really want to know is why the Royal Family and the British Government don't have their own private jets?? Nothing worse than seeing Prince William getting onto a Vistajet aircraft - that really is embarrassing!!

mixture 5th Oct 2014 17:56


I'm all for more jets for the big Corporations because it means more jobs for the likes of those who frequent this website.
Nothing wrong with jets.... IF....you have substantial overseas operations (or your home-turf is the size of the US or Australia).

Tesco have neither.

HQ is the UK. You don't need private jets to get around the UK.

And as highlighted earlier, their overseas ops are dwindling "65-70% of their revenues come from the UK, they've dumped their US & Japanese ventures and scaled back in China"

Thus Tesco do not need jets.


Tesco's will recover in time and you'll make money on your shares
I admire your rose-tinted spectacles in the face of a share that's been on the decline for two years (although they really never made back their post-crisis peak of 450 in April 2010, let alone their pre-crisis peak of 491... so they've really been declining since then, its just the down-trend has gotten stronger during 2013/2014) and is down almost 50% year to date to a level that's lower than the lows of the 2008 crisis where they bottomed at 291....their present low was last seen in 2003 ! :E

Given Tesco either underestimated or failed to see the German invasion (Aldi & Lidl), and instead persisted on their land-grab the writing is very much on the cards for Tesco. They're unlikely to disappear of course, but "modest" (to put it politely) performance is likely to be the order of the day for the foreseeable future ....

In the non-food space Tesco also seem to have underestimated how powerful the internet would become.

Poor share performance is going to be the way for a number of years, certainly no prospect of anything happening 2015/2016/2017 given they've just had a change of both CEO and CFO who will need to get their heads around what's going on. So if you're going to be buying Tesco shares you'd better be young and hiding those shares at the bottom of your pension pot SIPP and hoping the shares do something by the time you retire !

Personally I wouldn't touch Tesco shares with a bargepole ....there are much better risk/reward options for picking shares that will provide a reward in a much shorter timeframe than the 10+ years Tesco are likely to need !

Even Warren Buffet recently described his substantial investment in Tesco as a "huge mistake".

ShyTorque 5th Oct 2014 19:01

Severe lack of investment in our local supermarket meant the roof literally leaked in dozens of places; they began putting out lots of buckets to catch the water coming through in heavy rain. They even had to shut down a bank of freezers due to water falling on them.

So the only thing I go to Tescos for these days is their Tiger Bread.
I think they are a bunch of master bakers.

PaulFrank 5th Oct 2014 19:38

Even Iceland have their own jet:

M-FRZN

SpoolingUp 5th Oct 2014 19:46

Thanks for that concise rant Mr Mixture, but where does all that out of season Fruit and Veg come from - certainly not the UK.

How does the British public get such a wide variety of products all the year around, certainly not by executives banging around the UK on a low cost airline.

What on earth is the point of selling all those aircraft at a loss, just to appease the masses??

Get the aircraft on an AOC, Charter the backside out of them, get a good PR Team in, do a bit for charity, do a bit for the UN, use them for Aeromed and then use them when you need them. But just to ground the aircraft and not use them and rack up penalty costs is ludicrous.

The aircraft should be used more, not less, because the costs can be written off against TAX. Now Mr Tyler, march to the Capital!

mixture 5th Oct 2014 21:22


but where does all that out of season Fruit and Veg come from - certainly not the UK.
But how many people with the authorisation to use to the corporate jet are buyers from the Tesco purchasing department ?

Exactly. :ugh:

Therefore I re-iterate, in relation to Tesco, corporate jets are nothing but boys toys for C level execs.

McDoo 5th Oct 2014 21:25

Mixture

You really don't have a clue do you? And you are clearly not a corporate pilot otherwise your comments might have been more educated.:ugh:

The biggest threat to the livelihoods of people in this industry is the petty sniping from jealous individuals (and the gutter press) who believe that companies actually buy expensive aircraft so that the directors can swan off on 'jollies'. Nothing could be further from the truth.:=

Meanwhile, in the USA, WalMart operate 23 jets and a turboprop. Nobody gives them a hard time over it....

...and yes, buying shares in Tesco might be a good move:ok:

mixture 5th Oct 2014 21:29

McDoo,

Alright then, well if we look at it from a purely company point of view.... wasting all that money on corporate jets to fly these ego-trippers to their important meetings that they cannot possibly contemplate getting to in a more affordable manner on a commercial airline has not done the company much good has it ?

They've dumped or are reducing most of their international ops, and hence the over-inflated requirement for a jet is rapidly diminishing.

And then just look at the state of the company ......CEO gone, CFO gone, dodgy accounts, struggling to keep up with the competition.....

Having access to those jets hasn't exactly made them into a magical success story has it ! All it has been is a great big waste of time and money, just like many of their overseas operations.....


Meanwhile, in the USA, WalMart operate 23 jets and a turboprop. Nobody gives them a hard time over it....
Yes, and in accordance with my statement above "Nothing wrong with jets.... IF....you have substantial overseas operations (or your home-turf is the size of the US or Australia)."

Walmart's home turf is the US.....easier to justify a small fleet in the USA rather than the UK where you can get from one end of the country to the other in a couple of hours on a train (or quicker a commercial domestic flight).

McDoo 5th Oct 2014 21:33

Nothing wrong with jets.... IF....you have substantial overseas operations (or your home-turf is the size of the US or Australia).:ugh:

Tesco are the second biggest retailer in Eastern Europe and Turkey. They are huge in the
Far East and actually have an academy in Seoul. They have suppliers and investors all over the Globe who need to be visited and schmoozed.

If that isn't a case for corporate jets, everyone on this site might as well all pack up and look for another career.

BTW did you know they have ships too.....it's a global business, go figure...

mixture 5th Oct 2014 21:40


Tesco are the second biggest retailer in Eastern Europe and Turkey. They are huge in the Far East and actually have an academy in Seoul.
And how many commercial flights a day are there to Europe and the Asian hubs ?

Exactly !

McDoo 5th Oct 2014 21:43

Spooling Up

:D:D:D:D:D

McDoo 5th Oct 2014 21:44

Mixture,

None at all that get highly paid executives to three cities in one day.

Who are you? Disgruntled shareholder or gutter press?:mad:

McDoo 5th Oct 2014 21:58

Ah, gone quiet, hasn't he? ;)

mixture 5th Oct 2014 22:14


Ah, gone quiet, hasn't he?
No, I'm just choosing not to engage further with people who have a biased conflict of interest in the desire to see Tesco continue to maintain its un-necessary corporate jets.

If you take a cold hard look at it, you'll soon agree with me that in its present state, and given its recent track record, Tesco cannot justify maintaing the fleet.


BTW did you know they have up to SIX HUNDRED ships too..
Yeah, right, pull the other one, as if Tesco own or lease 600 ships for their own exclusive use.... we're talking about Tesco here, not Maersk ! :rolleyes:

I'm outta here, too much bias from the corporate jet drivers .....

SpoolingUp 6th Oct 2014 05:36


I'm outta here, too much bias from the corporate jet drivers .....
So there we have it, Mixture came into the Forum for a rant in a field of aviation he doesn't really understand, and got seen off by McDoo! Tremendous :D

Mixture, go and take on some bio-fuel, taxi around on one engine and whilst you're waiting for your passengers to turn up, have a cup of Peppermint Tea!

mixture 6th Oct 2014 06:44

From the FT :


A person close to the company said: “If you want an indication of what has gone wrong at Tesco [it was that] we ordered another Gulfstream.”

I rest my case, you lot are too biased and refuse to take off your rose-tinted spectacles !



got seen off by McDoo! Tremendous
Not sure I'd see it as a victory on your part. Rather that I decided to let you stew in your own biased juices. Big difference !

SpoolingUp 6th Oct 2014 07:18

Oh, no........he's back spouting more jealous vitriol.

Mixture, you seem to have far too much time on your hands to be writing all this drivel!

Lord Spandex Masher 6th Oct 2014 08:00

I wonder why it is that the new Chief Exec. has ordered ALL 5 jets to be sold...

How are they going to get around Europe and the world now? Maybe.....airlines?

SpoolingUp 6th Oct 2014 08:06

Charter........KISS!

McDoo 6th Oct 2014 16:43

Mixture,

Me biased? No. Informed? yes.

You on the other hand are basing all your arguments on what you read (or is it write? :E) in the gutter press.



I think you are in the wrong forum....

McDoo 6th Oct 2014 16:45

But how many people with the authorisation to use to the corporate jet are buyers from the Tesco purchasing department ?

You'd be surprised!

Citationlover 6th Oct 2014 17:24

tesco Gulfstream
 
hi to all,
have been reading this thread with interest as im both a tesco worker and a fan of all things that fly.

the previous CEO purchased the gulfstream i believe with the intention of it being based in the far east as this was his big dream to break the chinese market so from that point of view the jet probably would have been justified

the new boss has told the people with the purse strings to sell the jet and i believe is happy to take a loss of the deal.

as for the rest of the fleet , i dont know which aircraft they operate but im told there isnt a lot of value in them

they are still using netjets to get around the UK and Ireland and into various locations in europe.

from a personal point of view i dont have a problem with companies owing private jets anymore than owing a fleet of limos to drive the top boys round,
as tesco are still a very profitable company who in turn employ over 300,000 people in the UK alone, but have to agree that it is one PR disaster after another at the moment with maybe more to come

Tony Mabelis 6th Oct 2014 17:45

I was told by a senior accountant at my previous German motor company employer, that the company Gulfstream was a "tax deductable tool" and therefore probably in the long run costs the company approx $0.00.
Tony

BizJetJockey 6th Oct 2014 19:30

Citation,

who told you they are using Netjets?!

Global_Global 7th Oct 2014 08:11

I think it is amazing to see in a thread by professionals from the industry there are so many ill informed people about what biz aviation can do but equally what the cost is....

No wonder that people in the boardroom get it wrong as even the drivers have no clue about their toys! :E

fairflyer 7th Oct 2014 15:00

You'd assume that most of the users here might be pro business aviation and if a company turning over between £57-64 billion a year for the last five years, making between £2.6-4.1 billion in operating profit, can't justify a corporate jet (or two), then there's not much hope for us in a niche part of the aviation industry being beaten up everywhere we turn.

Give business aviation a break, please.

Global_Global 7th Oct 2014 15:39


Give business aviation a break, please.
Agree :ok:

darkroomsource 7th Oct 2014 16:00

A company of that size, clearly, can justify a corporate aviation department and a (small) fleet.

However, a company that is under investigation for its accounting practices; appears to be losing market share at an alarming rate; has lost chief executives under "questionable" circumstances; is a company that can not appear to be "throwing money around indiscriminately".

The key word is appear.

cldrvr 7th Oct 2014 16:43


who told you they are using Netjets?!
Lemme see, the owner of NJ is Tesco's biggest non-bank shareholder....(only 2 years ago he was the biggest)


Duhhh.


As he has lost 700Mn on his holdings, the least they can do is throw some charter business his way........

His dudeness 7th Oct 2014 17:29

@cldriver: good one !:ok:


You'd assume that most of the users here might be pro business aviation and if a company turning over between £57-64 billion a year for the last five years, making between £2.6-4.1 billion in operating profit, can't justify a corporate jet (or two), then there's not much hope for us in a niche part of the aviation industry being beaten up everywhere we turn.
I guess you have not yet understood that the nowadays operating profit margins have to be at least 2 digits. Thus we all should bring fuel and catering and be thankful and obedient for being allowed to breath the same air than the superior beings (the holy&devine industrial management folks) sitting in the back.

Irony mode off.

Citationlover 8th Oct 2014 08:40

tesco Gulfstream
 
i was chatting to someone at head office about the jet and it was from that conversation i was told they use netjets regularly from london city to dublin,liverpool and into europe

BizJetJockey 8th Oct 2014 11:09

Tesco's new G550 Registration
 
Do your research and you'll find that their company hawker and CJ operate their European flights, not NetJets.

Global_Global 8th Oct 2014 11:17

Regardless who or where: they will be flying a lo less going forward :rolleyes:

Richard101 8th Oct 2014 11:57

GINFO Search Results Summary | Aircraft Register | Operations and Safety


It would be very odd that with 4 aircraft (well 3 I assume the old G5 has gone) based at Luton they would use NetJets to fly around

Tray Surfer 8th Oct 2014 15:31

G-CGUL is a rather snazzy looking frame!

Such a shame that peoples jobs are going to be effected by all this…

Hope they all find something quickly when the end comes.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:39.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.