Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

UK Security for Biz Jets

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

UK Security for Biz Jets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th May 2014, 11:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
UK Security for Biz Jets

Are passengers (and pilots) who are travelling on a purely on a private aircraft, ie Global or Gulfstream etc, subject to the security limitations on liquids in carry on baggage.

How does the rule work, should such prohibited items be placed in the hold, given that on many larger aircraft the checked baggage is accessible in flight.

Is there a weight limit where enhanced security measures take effect?
Guptar is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 11:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Utopia
Posts: 846
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
UK Security for Biz Jets

You should receive; no replies to your question!
Klimax is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 14:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the UK, I believe with planes above 10T, the bags and pax are/can be subjected to screening.
south coast is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 16:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does the rule work
Just fine.
RAFAT is online now  
Old 12th May 2014, 11:52
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Righto Gentlemen,

I found all the info I wanted, freely available on Her Majesty's government website no less. Now fancy that, allowing mere mortals to see the regulations. Reminds me of the young ****** who told me that that Instrument approach plates were 'restricted material", in Oz.

BTW, Klimax and RAFAT, you two are complete pratts, remind me of the Lord Flasheart episode of Black Adder.
Guptar is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 15:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those are the minimum guidelines you have found on the gov web site.

Some airports decide to gold plate them and it might not be as you expect. Its best to check with your handler what the local rules are.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 16:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bristol
Age: 54
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, this is my understanding. A private aircraft no matter what weight does not require screening (or limitations on liquids or gels), however if the aircraft is parked beyond a Critical Point (CP) then all pax, crew and bags are subject to the normal limitations of a commercial > 10 ton flight.

To this end it would depend on which airport and FBO.

Does this agree with others understanding?

Last edited by Phil Brockwell; 12th May 2014 at 16:43. Reason: typo
Phil Brockwell is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 17:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nope it a seat and weight limit.

over 19 seats and or 10 tons, private or CAT they have to go through the full security process including liquids. Its not just a UK thing its EU wide.

The bigger FBO's have there own security arrangements which they can process them without the usual ball aches.

As for what happens after that I suspect nobody will want to say because in the UK anyway the DFT or who ever deals with it these days, will say its illegal for both crew and pax to have access to the security cleared hold baggage in flight.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 19:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In Exile...
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Broadly speaking it's a complete waste of time which no one seems to be able to grasp. The only aircraft I can think of which are subject to screening and you can't get at the hold in flight are the Citation Sovereign and Citation X...and on the hawker having had your bags security screened you have to walk past them again to get to your seat - presuming of course that you didn't fill the hold first and found your suitcase in the "secondary hold" - AKA rear bog
x933 is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 19:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bristol
Age: 54
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mad Jock,

You may be right about 19 seats (Can't think of anything under 10 tons and over 19 seats?)
Definitely you are wrong about a private aircraft over 10 tons (outside of a CP) we do this most days (we are an FBO with a full screening suite in our building). If you are being screened on private flights it can only be that you are :-
a/ In an airport where the FBO ramp is in a CP
b/ In Edinburgh where they screen you for no reason whatsoever.
PB
Phil Brockwell is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 20:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Home Counties
Age: 46
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 1 Post
Agree with Phil.

When we (>10T) operate privately out of the UK then there is no screening at the airport/FBOs that we use.

When operating charter, we are screened.

That said - there is nothing to stop a <10T aircraft having their crew request pax are screened anyway (I have done this in the past)
Globally Challenged is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 20:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Delta of Venus
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
What PB says...
Private jet is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 20:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh well, only normally do charters which do need it.

But under ten we don't.

Last edited by mad_jock; 12th May 2014 at 21:04.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 22:41
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: House
Age: 54
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When departing from Luton in a 10T+ aircraft with pax - better bring your own lube
zakka is offline  
Old 13th May 2014, 07:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just checked.

Under 10T and 19 seats private or CAT no need.

Over that for CAT you need to be security checked.

And for private its up to the airport because the rules are the minimum requirement but there is nothing stopping an airport gold plating the rules with more strict rules. So if the local chief numpty say you have to you have to.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 13th May 2014, 09:08
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: another place
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not just lube needed at Luton, bring some anti depressants, tranquillisers as well as a tin hat as your passengers with be totally pissed off!

D and F
Deep and fast is offline  
Old 13th May 2014, 10:10
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 196
Received 61 Likes on 34 Posts
I am sure the "security charge" levied which can be as much as £500 plus 20% tax has nothing to do with the compulsion to put pax and crews through this bullsh1t?
happyjack is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.