Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

AOC vs Private OP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jun 2012, 17:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AOC vs Private OP

We have been suggested to go from a private operation to getting our airplane on an AOC.

While searching for information as to whether or not it is worth it I would like to hear from you guys in here.

Any info??

BR

Jess

Last edited by Iceman666; 1st Jun 2012 at 17:21.
Iceman666 is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2012, 18:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Milano, Italia
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Iceman: What was the basis of the suggestion to obtain an AOC?

As you know there are numerous requirements associated with operating under an AOC (by comparison to the private category). These will depend on the authority to which the aircraft is registered and, to a lesser extent, where the aircraft normally operates (local aviation rules).

In many cases operators move onto an AOC when deciding to make their aircraft available for charter but there are other reasons also.
Savoia is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2012, 19:05
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The basis was to save money e.g. on fuel, yet I have spoken with the fuel supplier, we use at our home base, who told me that the only difference would be that we wouldn't pay VAT, but we get the VAT back already as it is anyway, being a VAT registered company (non-aviation).

The owner will probably not be willing to charter the aircraft out for others since he needs it to be available for him on short notice.

Jess
Iceman666 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 01:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: europe
Age: 67
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In many cases operators move onto an AOC when deciding to make their aircraft available for charter but there are other reasons also.
And pray what other reasons would there for be placing an airplane onto an AOC, if not for charter flights? Please don't say tax free fuel, because that aint valid.

I would love to hear why anyone in their right mind would want to put up with the bollox, paperwork, hoops and a ton of other meaningless cr@p if they have no desire to operate for charter.

Can't wait for the answer to this one.
deefer dog is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 05:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Milano, Italia
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The answer is fairly simple - some insurance companies offer better rates on hull insurance for aircraft operated under an AOC and while increased passenger liability becomes an 'issue' for public transport ops again, some insurers impose only a small premium for this (according to hours flown).

The cost benefits from savings on insurance tend to be marginal (overall) but .. there are owners who go through the rigmarole in order to reap the little they can. However (and as you might perhaps have imagined) these tend to be smaller aircraft operating on small budgets. For example, the last client of mine who did this owned an MS760 Paris which was used by a local flight school as a 'final hour jet experience' at the conclusion of their IFR course! Yes, he did generate a little income from putting the bird on an AOC but .. the small insurance saving was also a factor in his decision making.
Savoia is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 09:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dream land
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we used to operate on an AOC and now private, but with a different operator. insurance is now cheaper than before and also the fuel.

the reason for that is, this operator, operates many more aircraft all over the world and gets much better insurance and fuel rates.

most likely, training costs will increase on AOC as all operators i know, visit simulator twice a year vs ounce with private operators.

if you have no intentions to charter out, privat is for sure easier, but you have to be careful which register you pick as different rules apply.

EMB170
EMB170 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 09:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: any town as retired.
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MS760

Was that parked on D10? last month in LFPB.

Tried to get pic: but wet/wet/wet..... plus very widy.

All runways in us for departures, due to high southerly wind.....

Glf
Gulfstreamaviator is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2012, 18:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: europe
Age: 67
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If your insurance reduced as a result of changing to AOC ops it was for a completely unassociated reason! if you truly believe that saving even 10% of your premium (even if such was possible, which I can assure you it is not) you would still be classified as clinically insane for considering to change from private to commercial. Have you ANY concept regarding what is involved?

Regarding training. Please name a European AOC holder who actually conducts regular training in a simulator. There will be very few because of the costs involved, and EASA not insisting on it. Frankly speaking I believe this is a disgrace, and only those who actually participate in regular sim training are going to be well versed to handle real emergencies that cannot ever be simulated in an aircraft check ride.
deefer dog is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2012, 18:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was that parked on D10? last month in LFPB.
That didnt look as if it was still flyable!

Mutt
mutt is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 17:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding training. Please name a European AOC holder who actually conducts regular training in a simulator. There will be very few because of the costs involved, and EASA not insisting on it. Frankly speaking I believe this is a disgrace, and only those who actually participate in regular sim training are going to be well versed to handle real emergencies that cannot ever be simulated in an aircraft check ride.

Hi
All Swiss AOC pilots going twice a year to the SIM. No OPC on aircraft which is good.
But owners are running away to OE-... And D-....
CL30FL is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 17:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Charybde et Scylla
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yep I know a few companies who send their pilots regularly to the sim for their OPCs...In France,Portugal,uk,denmark,Suisse..ect as for the Banana civil aviation of OE...same as their border brothers: cheapstake, greedy and killing this job.

Last edited by jr of dallas; 4th Jun 2012 at 17:39.
jr of dallas is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 19:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: World
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also in Italy sim twice a year for AOCs.
dirk85 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.