Runway Analysis
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SPACE
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Runway Analysis
I was surprise to see commercial operators at restricted airports, with same biz jet aircraft we use in our company, flying in and out commercially not private, without the use of runway analysis for their departure runway.
Do I miss something?Are these people pirates?
Do I miss something?Are these people pirates?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Restricted airports in what way?
How do you know they were commercial?
What analysis do you mean?
Pirates? Get the facts before you slander people. There is, in 99.99999% a perfectly safe and legal explanation.
Or, give out more information before posting.
How do you know they were commercial?
What analysis do you mean?
Pirates? Get the facts before you slander people. There is, in 99.99999% a perfectly safe and legal explanation.
Or, give out more information before posting.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is not cryptic...If for this user the airplane that operates out of this airport to a destination with that many passengers, that requires that amount of fuel, and if at that weight in locust opinion they do not have enough runway to do it it , there is only two options, take less fuel or reduce the bow of the aircraft. If the runway is THAT short, it must be a light aircraft, therefore not a lot of room to play around with bow, therefore remains fuel... Same for landing..
Now, i do agree that a type of aircraft , a runway length and JAR or FAA ops would have been appreciated. ( for clarity of comments)
Now, i do agree that a type of aircraft , a runway length and JAR or FAA ops would have been appreciated. ( for clarity of comments)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where the sun shines on the righteous
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its been a while since I checked out pprune, been much too busy with the turkey and sherry over the last few weeks.
then I came across this thread and remembered why its been a while.....
locust, CL300 - what on earth are you talking about? If you want to talk to each other excluding everyone else, try PMs.
then I came across this thread and remembered why its been a while.....
locust, CL300 - what on earth are you talking about? If you want to talk to each other excluding everyone else, try PMs.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe they are pee'd that some other monkey had the balls and the ordasity to do some drug running out of the airport that they thought they had complete rights to.
Hence the cryptic clues.
Hence the cryptic clues.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Round n About
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
....so locust are you able to say anything sensible about this actually quite interesting and important topic or are you a bit of a time waster?
your Mum
your Mum
Last edited by Taxi2parking; 5th Jan 2009 at 16:53.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I cannot understand is whether most of you cannot understand what locust wanted to say or you never seen such things before? Get a life, this happens every day, and not only in 3rd world countries.
Performance, W&B, MTOW/MLW cheating is something you can withness even in airlines, let alone business aviation.
Performance, W&B, MTOW/MLW cheating is something you can withness even in airlines, let alone business aviation.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mysterious, cryptic, excluding.....
It must be my english or something. A ppruner is making a statement that some operators are not using Runway analysis because on his opinion with the amount of fuel/pax on board they do not have enough runway to land/take off.
I do reply that the only way to do it is to remove fuel...to a point there is no fuel on board , making them true magicians and good environmentalists, since they do operate aircraft without fuel.. Is this cryptic ?
Now, well I should post in japaneese may be it will be less cryptic... who knows ?
Was this not clear at all in the first post?
It must be my english or something. A ppruner is making a statement that some operators are not using Runway analysis because on his opinion with the amount of fuel/pax on board they do not have enough runway to land/take off.
I do reply that the only way to do it is to remove fuel...to a point there is no fuel on board , making them true magicians and good environmentalists, since they do operate aircraft without fuel.. Is this cryptic ?
Now, well I should post in japaneese may be it will be less cryptic... who knows ?
Was this not clear at all in the first post?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Cargo One
What I cannot understand is whether most of you cannot understand what locust wanted to say
Oh, I think we understood the allegation alright. I just think most of us are wondering what prompted locust to start this thread. If there's no supporting evidence it may as well be closed.
Or do we all start making random accusations about aircraft we see on the ramp?