Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Getting paid with FAA PPL on "N" jet.

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Getting paid with FAA PPL on "N" jet.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Aug 2008, 12:12
  #41 (permalink)  
Hawker driver
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Usually Marriotts
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One more thing: "Converting" a JAA to FAA ATPL will only work if you do a PIC rating. The written test requires a maximum of three days studying.
max.aret is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2008, 17:21
  #42 (permalink)  
Flintstone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
max.

Using a school that specialises in this and uses the computer based database can reduce this to a day, two at the most. Of course that will teach you the answers to the questions and not necessarily the syllabus. I did this with two colleagues (about eight years ago, granted) and we averaged high 90's pass rates. Pavlov has a lot to answer for.
 
Old 29th Aug 2008, 22:12
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Location: Location:
Age: 53
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apart from when the guy who is giving you your Check Ride/ATP check decides on the oral he can ask you more or less anything he likes out of FAR AIM .

There I was knowing the aircraft systems inside out having to explain what excemptions the FAA have filed with ICAO regarding runway markings....

Do a driveby ATP at your peril....its worthwhile even if just not to look a prat before you jump in the box....
G-SPOTs Lost is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2008, 22:28
  #44 (permalink)  
Flintstone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Look. Don't go spoiling this with sound advice and facts. This is PPRuNe you know.


Actually I'd forgotten the study done between passing the exam and taking the checkride. Give me JAA multiple guess exams over a FAA oral (snigger) any day.
 
Old 29th Aug 2008, 22:55
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to agree with a blue-(something or other) on another thread Mr Flintstone....................... 23:28 and still posting.......................get a life...........

Oh and yes l am just back from the pub....................(where did you get the beer mug smilie from )?.........
malc4d is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2008, 01:11
  #46 (permalink)  
Flintstone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's 23:28 where YOU are, perhaps not where I am. Time zones, UTC.... I told you looking out the window during your ground school wasn't a good idea.

Here, try these Smilies (<-) Fadzter.com - Free Forum & Message Board Emoticons & Smileys This one's my favourite Where's blue monday/my93wrx when you need him? Oh, he got banned. Shame really, I was SO looking forward to discussing his PM to me. The one that started "Tosser go runing to yo momma". Fencing with a finely honed mind like that one would have been a challenge indeed.





Not
 
Old 30th Aug 2008, 08:40
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, but ' watching the grass grow ' outside was sooooooooooooo much more interesting.............................


Enjoy




malc4d is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2008, 18:08
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slightly of thread. What about the reverse? FAA as P2 on G-reg with JAA PIC
NHAWK is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2008, 18:53
  #49 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The sad silly fact remains, if an owner of a jet wants to get a PPL into his corporate jet,
Sigh, we are not talking about the owner. We are talking about an employee of the owner to fly a corporate jet aircraft that the boss owns. He cannot do so with only a PPL. You can deny it, you can rail against it, you can try to get around it, but the bottom line is he cannot do it.

Now, if it so blasted important that this guy flies the jet as a PPL, then he can sell the damn thing to CirrusF for a dollar and then ride around in it as his buddy. Course I have no idea how Cirrus F can pay the operational cost of the Lear, because his boss cannot pay him so the boss can ride around in it. He still needs a co-pilot.

Look folks, Guppy is 100% correct on this, let it go and stay legal.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 10:59
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The wx is here, I wish u were beautiful
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it's not hours, why not just do CPL, then an FAA ATP with the type checkride? If you've got the time and experience already, the CPL should cost less than $1000 US and be done in a few days.
tbavprof is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 21:01
  #51 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I'm reading on here, and clearly the boss will have to fork out for all the bollocks of me filling in the endless paperwork to go to USA to get an FAA CPL, just so he can pay me a salary to fly alongside him, even though it adds nothing to my ability as a pilot (leaving aside FAA v JAR squabbles) and even though in reality the job where I will earn my salary is managing his yacht. But in this instance what seems even more absurd to me is that the boss himself flies LHS with an FAA PPL/IR! So the captain can fly on a PPL, but not the FO (even though he has a CPL but just from a different regime). All a bit daft IMO.
CirrusF is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 21:16
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: United states of Europe
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
61.113 - Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command.

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (g) of this section, no person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if:

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and
(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

Question now is:

Is your paycheck tied to your flightduty?

Yes --> Need CPL
No --> Need PPL

Safety, recurrent training, sound operational procedures, CRM... Thats a whole 'nother matter
PicMas is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2008, 21:49
  #53 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks PICMAs - My paycheck will be as boss's yacht manager. This will genuinely take up most of my professional time. Plane is entirely private - there are absolutely never any fee paying passengers or freight. The only pax are friends and family. So maybe I only need an FAA PPL? The captain only has PPL so why would I need CPL if I am not being paid for flying?

Obviously I will be doing the type-rating and all other airframe specific training so let's leave that out from now on! And to those who say "just get the CPL - it will only cost a few thousand dollars" - well I ask if you are so ready to throw away a few thousand dollars perhaps you would like to send the money over to me? I don't want to waste either my own money, nor my boss's money if it is he who ends up paying. I wouldn't be his yacht captain or manager if I threw away a few thousand dollars for nothing, nor would my boss be a wealthy man!

In any case, what will be the downside for me if I do take the job on the basis of my FAA PPL?

As I have said, the insurance are happy to insure the aircraft on the basis of my JAR CPL/IR/ME and my hours, as long as I do the type rating. The aircraft will remain entirely in Europe. So do I need to worry about the FAA? What is the worse they can do to me?

Last edited by CirrusF; 3rd Sep 2008 at 10:08.
CirrusF is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 10:20
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: EHAM
Age: 48
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Yeah really, who is flying as his FO now? Does he need any other RATED pilots?

I mean, yacht, private Lear and to top it off NO PASSENGERS Where do I sign?


BTW If you have the money, you can fly a B747-400 on your PPL, as long as you own the machine... AND HAVE A TYPE RATING!!!

Last edited by Rieckerdt; 3rd Sep 2008 at 11:15.
Rieckerdt is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 10:46
  #55 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cosmos
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Legality etc

Interesting thread.1or 2 on the nail.Check your FAR/AIM to start with.
1) Rules changed some 2 or 3 years back.Ref pressure from ICAO,now all Part 91 aircraft ref Lear/complex/2 crew types must have a full PIC or SIC Type rating on PPL;CPL or ATP. There is NO transference from JAA type to FAA type.Period.I have FAA/JAA Atps/PIC Typed on both. I checked with FSDO and FlightSafety,(USA),Regs dept last year. Don't talk yourself into a trap,and do read the endless small print in Insurance Covers.Your legal obligation to conform to the terms of your licence is to The FAA ONLY.
Not only FAA inspecters that could ramp check you,but so can JAA ones too.They are out to nail Part 91,sooner or later,so any excuse!!
My advice: get a cpl/atp and type rating (FAA). Lear is not a toy.It is a rocket,not a cessna 172 with a couple of Fans!! Good Luck.
mercuray is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2008, 03:16
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,415
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What is the worse they can do to me?
How about revocation, which would almost certainly be the certificate action proposed for violating the PPL privileges. Now, retesting for the PPL might not be too hard, a revocation would diminish future flying opportunities.to vanishingly small. Just get the CPL, whether or not it improves your flying ability, "failure to show a willingness to comply with regulations" is frequent legal phrase in enforcement actions. Are you a serious pilot or a wannabe. I do not want to share the skies with nothing less than serious pilots.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2008, 16:10
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Far East
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread is a sad commentary on the current integrity of aviation these days..
The airlines could figure out a way to get this guy into a seat...a bs checkride with a CPL sign off, ect...but not in corporate. He won't get insured in a jet, and should he find a Lloyds of London outfit that wants to roll the dice, the premium cost will be so much that he will have a captain sitting next to him. And even if his paternal granpa the owner of the jet wants to get him into this plane and pay the price...when he goes to school, he won't pass, doesn't have the skills and experience to pass a type at someplace like Flightsafety or Simuflite...the only way around this, is he goes to that BS type rating factory in Los Angeles.....but even they might wince at passing him through....I don't see it happening...
glawkshuter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.