PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Aviation History and Nostalgia (https://www.pprune.org/aviation-history-nostalgia-86/)
-   -   Britannia Airways 737-200s. (https://www.pprune.org/aviation-history-nostalgia/642319-britannia-airways-737-200s.html)

Mooncrest 26th Aug 2021 17:29

Britannia Airways 737-200s.
 
Which of these aircraft were the early basic version and which were the Advanced ? My guess would be:

AVRL, AVRM, AVRN, AVRO, AXNA, AXNB, AXNC, AWSY and AZNZ - all early models.

Then, everything from BADP to BKHF plus BGNW and BJXJ were the Advanced variant.

I don't know about the various leased specimens from Gulf Air, PLUNA etc.

Thankyou.



Meikleour 26th Aug 2021 18:04

G-BADP & G-BADR were ADVs with the small engines ie. -9 (these were tailored for flights between long runways like LGW and long sectors to the Canaries due to their lower fuel burn. ) All subsequent aircraft were ADV with -15 engines. There were some oddballs leased in for summer seasons but I will leave it to others to elaborate.

Mooncrest 26th Aug 2021 18:25

Thankyou Meikleour. I suspected the first two Advanced weren't quite the same as the later ones; now I know it's the less powerful engines that were the difference.

I forgot to mention BOSL and OSLA. Although not owned by Britannia they were in everything but name essentially.

GBYAJ 26th Aug 2021 19:10

What was G-BMMZ? I may be wrong but it was never a regular at NCL in the late 80’s and always wondered why.

AXNA and NB weren’t too common either but from what I’ve read they struggled from LGW with those cargo doors so NCL to TFS may not have been a step too far…

Flightrider 26th Aug 2021 19:19

BMMZ was the Air Mali machine and a low gross weight aircraft if I remember rightly.

There was a difference (believe it or not) between BADP and BADR - can’t remember if it was weights or comms equipment but they were not identical twins as the registrations would suggest. Maybe someone else can recall …


Rutan16 26th Aug 2021 19:27

AZNZ was a United build frame that they got rid of very early for some reason.

WHBM 26th Aug 2021 20:07


Originally Posted by Rutan16 (Post 11101773)
AZNZ was a United build frame that they got rid of very early for some reason.

I think it was in the fleet until 1985, when it was disposed along with a number of the other early ones documented here when the first 767s came. It was of course an oddball being to the United spec. It ended up in Africa early this century, when it was damaged in flight by hail to the extent it wasn't worth repairing.

Mooncrest 26th Aug 2021 20:07


Originally Posted by Rutan16 (Post 11101773)
AZNZ was a United build frame that they got rid of very early for some reason.

Most of Britannia's 737-200s were built to their own '204' specification. BGNW was a -219 which arrived via Air New Zealand/NAC. BJXJ was from the same source ultimately but Britannia acquired her from Dan Air. BOSL and OSLA were both - 2U4s, both built for Owners' Services but technically identical to Britannia's own Advanced -204s.

The Civil Aircraft Markings books in the 1980s used to flag up the Britannia ADV models in the type description, whereas the early birds were simply listed as -204. But I can't quite remember which was which.
I would venture that all the other British-registered 737-200s were, at that time, the Advanced models so highlighting this was unnecessary .

GBYAJ 26th Aug 2021 20:19

G-BJXJ, always thought it was odd that DA got rid of one of their most modern aircraft to a rival. However, have now read how senior managers at DA tried to persuade Fred Newman to modernise with 737’s and when he didn’t they left for Air Europe, Air 2000 etc.. probably replaced XJ with a 1-11 or 727…

Mooncrest 26th Aug 2021 21:15


Originally Posted by GBYAJ (Post 11101802)
G-BJXJ, always thought it was odd that DA got rid of one of their most modern aircraft to a rival. However, have now read how senior managers at DA tried to persuade Fred Newman to modernise with 737’s and when he didn’t they left for Air Europe, Air 2000 etc.. probably replaced XJ with a 1-11 or 727…

Ironically, two or three years earlier, Dan Air took on one of the OSL -2U4s from Britannia and re-registered her G-ILFC, then WGEL.

WHBM 26th Aug 2021 22:08

Aircraft that appear to be equal mechanically may be very different financially when on lease, the terms of different ones of the same type can be surprisingly far apart, to the extent that the airline may look to get rid of one in short order to replace it with a comparable one on much better terms, if they can't "renegotiate". Then some may be on lease, others outright purchased - but later sold to a lessor and leased back. I think that Fred Newman at Dan-Air liked to buy older frames "for cash", and run them to end of life. Their newer ones in the fleet were nevertheless leased. Airframe hours, next D-check, etc, and the overall basis on it being hours-based, monthly-based, etc, all plays a part in the costing, and in the negotiations standoff when taking aircraft on.

kenparry 27th Aug 2021 07:27

Although -DP and -DR were normally fitted with -9 engines, they were occasionally fitted with the -15 version. I think this was purely a function of engine availability - I remember a period when one of them had a -9 one side and a -15 the other. No useable performance benefit, of course!

As regards route suitability, DP & DR were not scheduled for any specific routes. With the small engines, they were not good off short runways; off a long one it was necessary to use improved climb (i.e. increased VR & V2) to get airborne at the structural limit weight. I don't recall any system or fit differences between the two.

One of the problems with the early -200s such as RL, RM, and NZ, was the low max ZFW and TOW, the latter being 49442 kg, limiting the max sector with a full load to 3 hr or so. From G-AVRN up to G-BADR that went up to 53070, and from G-BGYJ onwards to 55111kg. When those were new, they could take full fuel and a full load of passengers, and that enabled GLA to Cyprus direct. After about 10 years' service the empty weight had increased by around a tonne, so full fuel + full load was no longer possible.

Mooncrest 27th Aug 2021 08:42

Interesting stuff; evidently there are /were variants within variants viz engine power and MTOW etc. Also about terminating lease or finance deals early in order to obtain more attractive terms on essentially an identical aircraft. Only possible without stiff penalties for early termination, I expect, or if the benefits of a new deal offset any penalty.

treadigraph 27th Aug 2021 09:31


Originally Posted by kenparry (Post 11101939)
After about 10 years' service the empty weight had increased by around a tonne, so full fuel + full load was no longer possible.

What made up the tonne, presumably paint touch up (how often does an airliner get a strip and repaint?), anything else?

I remember once seeing a figure of how much fuel American Airlines saved by leaving their fleet largely unpainted!

Jackjones1 27th Aug 2021 11:21

On BA jumbos when they were being weighed they allowed a tonne for condensation within the soundproofing of the cabin .... true or not it did seem an excessive amount!

kenparry 27th Aug 2021 11:21

The weight increase was mostly, I think, not bare aircraft weight, but changes to the galley fit of trolleys for catering and duty free. A loaded trolley was around 200-250kg, I seem to remember.

The 2 cargo convertibles, G-AXNA & NB, were about a tonne heavier than their all-pax contemporaries such as G-AXNC, which was down to the freight floor, the big door, and the associated necessary fuselage strengthening.

treadigraph 27th Aug 2021 11:27

Thanks Ken!

Akrotiri bad boy 27th Aug 2021 13:39

The gradual age related accumulation of weight also occurs in the marine world, termed "deck creep". This is usually due to innocuous mods such as nav kit upgrades, galley reconfigurations and comfy chairs for the watchkeepers. Each mod itself doesn't amount to much but taken as a whole over a five year period it can make quite a change to the overall weight and stability of the vessel. Apologies for the thread creep in explaining deck creep.
Akro

GBYAJ 27th Aug 2021 18:11

Sometime between 1983 (my first BY flight) and 1987 (the next one) the 737’s were fitted with little displays through the cabin showing height and speed. Then I think in the early 90’s with tv’s to compete with the likes of Air Europe and Air 2000 when it all became about service. The initial kit might have added a few extra kg’s the IFE perhaps quite a few more!

kenparry 27th Aug 2021 20:43

The cabin data displays were called "PDADS", which meant something like Passenger Display Automatic Data System (or maybe Passenger Data Automatic Display System) - a bit of an innovation at the time. The -200 was an almost wholly analogue aircraft, and I'm unsure where the speed data came from. Altitude, easy, from the ATC transponder, but we had no readout of groundspeed* in the cockpit. Some of the guys were dab hands at timing the rate of change of the DME to measure groundspeed, but I don't think that fed the PDADS, as it's obviously only accurate when the beacon is on track.

* Further thought gets me to recall that the Omega had a groundspeed readout, and eventually most (all?) of the fleet was so fitted. However, Omega as fitted by BAL was somewhat erratic in its performance. When the Quebecair aircraft were leased in, their Omega behaved impeccably. We then learnt that the BAL installation was cheap and not so cheerful, using the ADF sense aerial to feed the Omega, whereas Quebecair's sets had dedicated aerials.

oxenos 27th Aug 2021 22:17

Ryanair bought 6 of the Britannia 737-200s in about '93/4. They were all ADV -15 55 tonners, i.e. the most recent and best of the fleet.
I joined Ryan in '97, and they were still chuckling over the price they got them for.
G-BJCV became EI-CJC
G-BKHE " EI-CJD
G-BJCU " EI-CJE
G-BTZF (or BKHF) became EI-CJF
G-BGYK became EI-CJG
G-BGYJ " EI-JCH
The last time I flew an ex Brit 73 was in OCT 2005 (CJG). They were then being phased out, as the 787-800's took their place. My last flight before retiring was 19 DEC 05, which was one of the last 732 flights by Ryan.

I always felt Britannia missed a golden opportunity when they got rid of the 73's and went all 757/767. They had a number of good, recent 732's which they sold, flooding the market and so not getting a good price. They got rid of a lot of pilots, paying out on redundancy deals.. Brit was up until then running a cheap "no-frills" schedule between Luton and Belfast, and, selling every seat.
If they had kept the best aircraft, kept on pilots to operate them, and expanded the no frills routes, they could have had a good thing going, using their buying power to keep costs down on fuel, handling, etc. Ryanair may never have expanded as it did, and Easyjet may never have got started.
Not sour grapes on my part - I did very well out of the redundancy, and spent the next 12 years flying ex Brit 732's fot different outfits, including Easy, when it started with two aircraft leased in, and later with Ryan.

mustbeaboeing 28th Aug 2021 00:24

Quote.
“I always felt Britannia missed a golden opportunity when they got rid of the 73's and went all 757/767”.

My understanding was that Britannia traded in the B737-200’s to Boeing to get a good deal on the B757’s and Boeing ‘sold / leased’ them on.

Agreed about the pulling back on the Scheduled routes. LTN BFS LTN could have been the start of something else.

A phrase for those who were there by the then MD, was ‘the wrong kind of profit’ ………if only

WHBM 28th Aug 2021 11:37


Originally Posted by Mooncrest (Post 11101964)
. Also about terminating lease or finance deals early in order to obtain more attractive terms on essentially an identical aircraft. Only possible without stiff penalties for early termination, I expect, or if the benefits of a new deal offset any penalty.

There's no such thing as a standard set of lease terms, all depends on individual negotiation and how the market is. Commonly there are break points when you can more readily hand back, which themselves become times for further hard-nosed renegotiation. There's normally an exec at most carriers who is the expert at this.


Originally Posted by mustbeaboeing (Post 11102348)
A phrase for those who were there by the then MD, was ‘the wrong kind of profit’ ………

Indeed. One has known several organisations whose accounts show them profitable every quarter - until they go bankrupt.

Mooncrest 28th Aug 2021 11:50

I guess by about 1972-73, i.e. when BADP and BADR were delivered, the Advanced was the standard production variant. Did any other early 737 customers, e.g. Aer Lingus and Braathens, also order the Advanced ? Both these airlines were regular or semi-regular users of LBA's short runway in the 1970s, albeit not flying long distances. Their early 737s should therefore have been able to cope.

WHBM 28th Aug 2021 12:20

Sure, the Advanced became the standard production type. Both Aer Lingus and Braathens bought later aircraft, they both had integrated local short-haul networks with substantial IT flights to the Mediterranean, which particularly for Braathens from Scandinavia stretched the aircraft as each improvement came along.

oxenos 28th Aug 2021 12:23


Britannia traded in the B737-200’s to Boeing to get a good deal on the B757’s
G-BECG and G-BECH were apparently owned by an American pension fund - I believe for dentists. When they left Brit, they were taken on a 4 year lease by the Independent Aviation Group, who were a firm of seat brokers ( not the other IAG). It not being economical to have an Air Operator's Certificate for 2 aircraft, they were put on G.B.'s AOC, and G.B. recruited extra pilots to cover them. These pilots did not just fly CG and CH, but all GB pilots flew both these and GB's other 732s, which were British Airways pattern.
IAG found various charters to use the aircraft on, including work for Sterling in Denmark and Sobelair (SABENA's charter division).
In 1995, IAG got the contract to start Easyjet, with flights commencing in the November. At that pont, Easyjet consisted of the two aircraft and two routes, LTN-GLA-LTN and LTN-EDI-LTN. G.B provided the pilots and senior cabin crew, and Easyjet the remaining cabin crew.
This involved the expense of crews travelling from their LGW base to LTN and back, and ocasionally hotel accomodation in LTN, so in July 1996, the aircraft were transferred to Air Foyle's AOC in LTN. Air Foyle recruited pilots, some transferring from G.B., the others being largely ex Brtannia.
Once it was seen that there was the demand, Easyjet started to acquire their own aircraft and crews and add routes. Early additions were Inverness, Aberdeen and Amsterdam..
In April 1997 IAG's contract with Easyjet expired, and they switched to a contract with Virgin Express. CG and CH were based in Heathrow, operating LHR- Brussels, and on to other Virgin Express destinations, usually Nice and Milan (Malpensa).
This continued until early October 1997.
At that pont the lease on the aircraft expired. To renew it would have required IAG to pay for them to be hush kitted, so it was not renewed.
I believe both aircraft ended up in Argentina, and were scrapped about 10 years later.
.

Liffy 1M 28th Aug 2021 13:38


Originally Posted by Mooncrest (Post 11102520)
I guess by about 1972-73, i.e. when BADP and BADR were delivered, the Advanced was the standard production variant. Did any other early 737 customers, e.g. Aer Lingus and Braathens, also order the Advanced ? Both these airlines were regular or semi-regular users of LBA's short runway in the 1970s, albeit not flying long distances. Their early 737s should therefore have been able to cope.

Aer Lingus bought three Advanced 737s new: EI-ASL (-248C) and EI-BEB/BEC. A further, secondhand, acquisition was also of the Advanced model, viz EI-BDY (a series -2E1, ex-Eastern Provincial). For reasons of standardisation across the airline's 737 fleet, all were fitted with -9A engines.

Mooncrest 28th Aug 2021 14:39

Thanks all. I remember seeing EI-BDY in summer 1987 when Britannia had her on a damp lease from Aer Lingus.

I've often wondered if the Britannia and Braathens 737s and 767s were more or less identical ? My theory is based solely on the adjacent Boeing customer codes, -04 and -05!

Mr @ Spotty M 28th Aug 2021 14:54

The B767-200s both of Britannia and Braathens were the only ones to my knowledge that had twin over-wing exits.

TCU 28th Aug 2021 20:10

So checked my log and flew the following BY 737's:

10.02.83 LTN-GVA G-BGYL
17.02.83 GVA-LTN G-BFVB (named Sir Thomas Sopwith)
15.02.92 ZRH-LGW G-AVRN

It has always provided me with a bit of nerdy amusement that my first BY 737 flight was in a G-BG reg aircraft, and my last, some 9 year later, was in an "original" G-AV aircraft.....

'YL of course ended her days plummeting into the Panamanian jungle, with COPA, in what was "suspected" as one of the early rudder hard over incidents




thegypsy 29th Aug 2021 07:01

G BMMZ was a nightmare of an aircraft. Useless weather radar.
I had smoke in cockpit on flight from Nice to Luton, landed at Lyon and waited for engineers from Ltn to fix it.
Latter when a B767/757 Captain I too took redundancy in 1994 and worked as expat for the last 9 years until 60.

DH106 29th Aug 2021 11:21


Originally Posted by TCU (Post 11102662)
'YL of course ended her days plummeting into the Panamanian jungle, with COPA, in what was "suspected" as one of the early rudder hard over incidents

I thought that one had been shown to be an artificial horizon failure on a dark night?

WHBM 29th Aug 2021 12:19


Originally Posted by DH106 (Post 11102930)
I thought that one had been shown to be an artificial horizon failure on a dark night?

Me too. And the failure was attributed to the connecting cables found being installed overtight and short-circuiting (identified by the FAA/NTSB/Boeing in the USA). Likewise the CVR was failed because the tape had snapped. Both pointed to the last time they had been maintained/reinstalled, which had not happened during the lease. The form of the loss of control also looked more like following a failed horizon rather than a jammed rudder. The aircraft still belonged to Britannia, who sent personnel to the accident scene and the enquiry. It had been leased to Copa Panama just 8 weeks beforehand, and was still essentially in Britannia livery, with the Copa name stuck over the top. It was also different in some horizon switch settings to other Copa 737s, which the crew had not been through any differences training on, and possibly the leasing carrier had not even identified. It had been re-reg in Panama for the duration of the lease so the AAIB did not need to get involved.

TCU 29th Aug 2021 13:35


Originally Posted by DH106 (Post 11102930)
I thought that one had been shown to be an artificial horizon failure on a dark night?

DH106. You and WHBM are correct and it was my bad in not fully expanding on my use of the word "suspected". Must have been an awful journey down.

Airbanda 29th Aug 2021 16:33


Originally Posted by Rutan16 (Post 11101773)
AZNZ was a United build frame that they got rid of very early for some reason.

We flew Mahon to Castle Don on NZ in April 1975. My recollection is that it was mainly used on behalf of Horizon Midlands from BHX or EMA (still CDD at the time). There was a plaque with the Horizon Midlands logo just inside the forward door.

rog747 30th Aug 2021 07:38

BY's early 737's were delivered with original Boeing 707/727 type hat rack interiors with individual PSU's over the seat rows, in addition all the early ones had just a forward galley with 2 toilets aft, whereas the newer BY 737's had split galley's fore and aft.

First seating config was 117 pax to match the Bristol Britannia's, but this went eventually up to the charter norm of 130 pax.

I recall BCAL around 1973 began installing on their 707C's the new wide-look cabin interior with flush overhead lockers to compete with 747/DC-10/Tristar Jumbo Operators in the new wide-body age.
Britannia would eventually follow suit for their 737's, and later orders would have been delivered with the new cabins installed, but I have no idea what was the first new aircraft to have this factory fitted, but it may have been later deliveries that ended towards the time of new 767 deliveries in 1984.
Early BY 737 aircraft still in the fleet were retrofitted with the new wide-look cabins.

United had sold some of their first -222 fleet early on to both Britannia and Transavia.

737-200ADV Advanced were built from June 1971 onwards.
Thus G-AVRL-O, G-AXNA-C, G-AWSY, and G-AZNZ were not ADV models,
but from 1973 G-BADP-R, G-BAZG-I G-BECG/H and those then on were all -204 or 2U4 ADV models --- I'm sure someone here will clarify this.

Britannia's 767-204's had GE CF6 engines with a 2-4-2 seating config for 273, then to 290 pax, but Braathen's pair of 767-205's had PW JT9D engines with a nicer 2-3-2 config seating 256.
Braathens soon found the 767 unsuitable and too big, and offered them for sale in 1986.
Britannia, I assume due to their PW engines did not take them despite the pair having the 2 extra over wing exits to enable 290 pax.
However, one did come into BY's fleet later on a lease as G-BNAX.
Aeromaritime also ordered a 762 with two extra over wing exits, this 767 went to Balkan.

BY 204 and BU 205 Boeing Codes were both given for early 1968 orders for the first new European Customer 737-200 deliveries.

Mooncrest 12th May 2022 20:56

Reading this again has refreshed my memory. Once Braathens had decided the 767 wasn't really their thing, they plugged the resultant shortfall in capacity by ordering another half-dozen or so 737-205s, at the same time offloading their F28s. Interesting that Braathens opted for a tried and tested and thoroughly proven aeroplane, rather than going for the new 737-300. Similarly, their chums at Britannia preferred the 737-200 over the -300 and disposed of their Orion acquisitions after a couple of years or so.

I wonder if the Owners Services 737s, BOSL and OSLA, were actually ordered by Britannia but purchased by OSL as a means of avoiding a potential import tax bill for Britannia ? Or some other complex legal or financial reason ? The aircraft were effectively operated and maintained as if they were Britannia's own -204s, the only difference being a small variance in the customer number, i.e. 2U4. I thought the same about BECH and BECG, although they were -204s.

oxenos 12th May 2022 21:39


I thought the same about BECH and BECG, although they were -204s.
CG and CH were I believe, owned by an American dentists pension fund. (See Post #26) I believe they left the British Register in OCT97/

Mooncrest 12th May 2022 22:14

I've often been intrigued by the minutiae of aircraft ownership and leasing. Over the years, I've read several plaques in the passenger entrances with variations on, "this aircraft, with or without its engines, is owned by Blah Finance (Cayman Islands/Jersey/Antigua etc) is leased to GECAS/ILFC, is sub-leased to ABC Airways and is sub-sub-leased to XYZ Airlines, which is a trading style of Blah Aviation (Bermuda) Limited". I know, it's a purely fictional and extreme example!

Flightrider 12th May 2022 23:36

I think there was a fleet commonality issue for Braathens with a mix of -200s and -300s, just as there was for Britannia until they inherited the Orion aircraft with the take-over. And the early 737-300s with B1 engines were not exactly long-range aircraft which would have limited Braathens' capability to do Norway-Canaries which they did with the later HGW 737-200s. Then again, I seem to recall Orion doing LGW-Tel Aviv with a B1 737-300!!

The OSL 737-200s were ordered by OSL and Britannia won a contract to fly them against other UK rivals. The arrangement was packed up by the end of Summer 1983 and Rank/OSL flew their passengers on the ex-Laker BCal Charter DC10-10s, later becoming Cal-Air and then Novair as a wholly owned subsidiary of Rank/OSL by that time. Novair had two 737-400s towards the end of its life (one of which went to British Midland to replace the aircraft lost at Kegworth), and one of the OSL 737-200s went on to Dan-Air as G-ILFC and then G-WGEL which stayed with them until the bitter end.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:52.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.