Suggestions welcome
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....daf014ca06.jpg
Asking for a frined: Any suggestions of type and likey year of ops for these three? https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....1eb21ef979.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....71d2a62af8.jpg |
Middle - Blackburn Beverley when preserved at Museum of Army Transport, Beverley. Now moved to Fort Paull and the only survivor.
Other two are an Andover and Hercules... |
Hard to be sure, but looks like a 46 Squadron tail badge on the Andover, so likely taken in the late '60s.
|
Grand, thanks for the ID. I knew the Herc but not the other two. I am amused that the men standing around the Herc and Andover are not concerned about their hearing! I confess, I did know that they were taken in Anguilla in 1970. The man who took them was in the Royal Engineers and involved in construction a new pontoon and other items.
|
Treadi,
Middle - Blackburn Beverley when preserved at Museum of Army Transport, Beverley. Now moved to Fort Paull and the only survivor. CAEBr |
Agree with the Hendon location as that looks like the later refurbished Graham White shed in the background.
Rob |
Sorry, yes you are right, that doesn't look anything like the Beverley at Hendon as I remember it in front of the main entrance, but it looks as though they moved it several times between it's arrival and scrapping.
Only glimpse of the Beverley at MOAT Beverley I had was the tops of the fins from a train... |
It's definitely Hendon, there wasn't that much space at Beverley or any grass as I recall, just concrete.
|
Originally Posted by treadigraph
(Post 10251430)
Middle - Blackburn Beverley when preserved at Museum of Army Transport, Beverley. Now moved to Fort Paull and the only survivor.
Other two are an Andover and Hercules... |
Agree with the Hendon location as that looks like the later refurbished Graham White shed in the background. |
Had not heard of Fort Paull, so looked it up. Craning the Beverley in must have been sight? It's a chunk beast.
|
Not really relevant as it's a different airframe but I, along with many others, wonder about the long-time survival prospects of XB259 at Fort Paull.
I understand the reasons for wanting it there, close to where it was built, but it's also close to a saltwater estuary. I believe Elvington offered it a home at the time and I can't help thinking it would have had a better chance of a long life-span there. |
Originally Posted by PAXboy
(Post 10253233)
Had not heard of Fort Paull, so looked it up. Craning the Beverley in must have been sight? It's a chunk beast.
|
Great photos, thanks for sharing them. Going off-topic a little: anyone know the reason, if any, for the white area around the cockpit on all three machines? Looks at odds with the camouflage on the rest of the aircraft?
|
I believe it was meant to keep the flight deck a bit cooler than it otherwise would have been.
|
Originally Posted by chevvron
(Post 10253307)
Don't forget it went to Leconfield for many years when Paull closed so it must have been dismantled and 'roaded' for both moves.
There's a good view of the aircraft (and the Minster) in this video: |
Thanks - it was ridiculously big!
|
Hard to be sure, but looks like a 46 Squadron tail badge on the Andover, so likely taken in the late '60s |
Originally Posted by Tee Emm
(Post 10253660)
Re the RAF Andover. I recall seeing an RAF Andover in for servicing at Woodford in 1966. Walking past the hangar I was assailed by a nose-wrinkling smell from the aircraft. Yet maintenance people working in and around the aircraft apparently accepted the smell as SOP for an RAF aircraft? That aircraft was still there several days later and the smell was overpowering. Turned out the Elsen Toilet can was full of.faeces from the time it was flown in. An industrial dispute arose on who should clean out the can. The RAF crew who had flown the Andover to Woodford or the maintenance staff? The result was an impasse for a week or so. Pretty disgusting. I don't know how it ended. Thought I would share it with readers..
|
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 10253459)
I believe it was meant to keep the flight deck a bit cooler than it otherwise would have been.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:40. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.