Morning Ken.
Sorry mate - I was also a little confused last night - I was looking at another image I had stored. http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...ies/wibble.gif Prolly that nice bottle of port I had been given. edit: I have to leave in any case in twenty minutes for a couple of hours of lecturing. :uhoh: |
Morning David...say no more mate;)
Right, off we go with the next challenge: http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/i...r/7b3a656a.jpg |
Blimey mate - it seems to have a float in mid-air above the cockpit.
|
it seems to have a float in mid-air above the cockpit. |
Low wing I reckon? Russian? Single engine?
|
Morning Martin
Low wing I reckon? Russian? Single engine? I should be technically correct here. Because of the era, this aircraft is from the USSR. I am not entirely sure if it was built in Russia, or a former Soviet state, although I believe the latter. |
Biplane?????
|
Not a biplane.
|
OK, so a high-wing (with wing-tip floats?). However, it also sems to have buoyancy gear along the fuselage, al la Dornier?
|
OK, so a high-wing (with wing-tip floats?) Not sure about the buoyancy gear though, nothing obvious in the 3-view or photo. |
The photo does exhibit some differences to the side view I have used, albeit nothing that would prevent recognition of the challenge. The most obvious difference is that the tail is partially filled in, as well as a different profile to the underside of the fuselage. Whether these were just inaccuracies on the original 3-view used or changes to the design I don't know. Anyway, I'll post a revised silhouette shortly.
Revised silhouette to reflect differences between photo and 3-view: http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/i...r/3ab38f36.jpg |
Is it actually from a Russian flying boat designer?
|
Not a company (or designer) particularly known for flying boats.
|
Clue, this can best be described as a homebuild or perhaps more accurately, an amateur design.
|
A Shavrov??
|
Not a Shavrov Martin.
|
Not a company (or designer) particularly known for flying boats. |
Me too!!!! Ken, you're a bu***r :)
|
Mmm, this one seems to be proving difficult:)
Perhaps you're thinking it's older than it is....1970's design. It used major components from other aircraft, as well as a boat! |
:eek::eek::eek:.......
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:37. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.