Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

New ME-262?

Old 30th Dec 2002, 16:18
  #1 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post New ME-262?

I just read that a “new” ME-262 has just been flown in Washington State. Apparently someone got an original Me-262 and copied it and built a new airplane. I don’t know what kind of engines it has. The project was started in 1993.

Anybody got any details?
con-pilot is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2002, 17:35
  #2 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: USA
Age: 62
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Read this
ME 262
Bus429 is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2002, 17:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 539
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Hi Con-Pilot
Re the ME 262. there is a good little article in the FEB edition of FLYPAST MAG (on page 3).
If you have any probs their web is www.flypast.com . I do hope this will help you and a Happy New Year.
All the Best
SPIT is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2003, 19:18
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: ISLE OF MAN
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what about the replica fw 190's?
STANDTO is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2003, 08:25
  #5 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pics of the Me262 first full flight:

FJJP is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2003, 08:28
  #6 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Still a horney looking airplane.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2003, 12:03
  #7 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,544
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Rebuilt Messerschmidts and FWs

The Flugwerk FW190s have not flown yet as far as I know. They are using a different approach though which differs from the ME262 assembly line. The FW190s are delivered as kits, which means that you'll be assembling and flight testing your own plane (or arranging for it to be flight tested). The first FW is still with the factory in the engine running phase but several kits have been delivered and are being assembled. All a bit different from the ME262s which will be delivered in airworthy state.

Flugwerk website
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2003, 14:09
  #8 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 15,744
Received 773 Likes on 387 Posts
AW & ST:

The first of two reproduction Me262A jet fighters flew for 35 min. on Dec. 20 from Paine Field near Seattle.

Test pilot Wolfgang Czaia said the airplane was airborne after a takeoff run of 14 sec., lifting off at 110 kt. Czaia left the gear down during the flight as a safety precaution. "The airplane's handling qualities were excellent in all three axes, and I could trim the aircraft to fly straight and level hands-off," he said.

The Messerchmitt's aerodynamically operated inboard/outboard leading edge slats worked well, fully extending at 150 kt. and retracting fully at 165 kt., and there was minimum pitch change during flap extension/retraction, Czaia said.

Before returning to Paine Field, Czaia set up a 3-deg. glidepath at 140 kt. to check handling on final approach, slowly reducing airspeed and increasing angle of attack until the airplane stalled at 100 kt. "There was only a mild pitch-down at the stall break and I had good aileron control at the stall," he said.

For landing, Czaia flew the final approach with the airplane trimmed for 125 kt., slowly reducing power to touchdown at about 108 kt.

Czaia said the second flight is tentatively scheduled for late this week and will include retracting the landing gear. Future flights will expand the airplane's flight envelope slowly and focus on determining the Me262's critical Mach number, which is estimated to be Mach 0.82-0.90. The jet is powered by two GE J-85 turbojet engines each rated at 2,850 lb. static thrust.
ORAC is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2003, 10:22
  #9 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A fantastic aeroplane. And the design has still held good. Look at the wingplan and engine layout of the Boeing 737 100/200 and it doesn't take much imagination to see where they got the idea.
Moneyshot is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2003, 15:03
  #10 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Teddington, Middlesex
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good design, until you lose an engine on take-off (anybody have a figure for the single-engine safety speed?) Many of the second-generation, postwar twin-engine jet fighters had their motors buried in the wing roots or fuselage, for this same reason.

However, what a fabulous project this has been and what a wickedly handsome machine!
Philip Whiteman is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2003, 22:16
  #11 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,544
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
The engine philosophy on the new-build Me262s is actually quite interesting. They are using GE CJ-610 jets, the civil version of the engine that powers F-5s, which is considerably lighter and a bit more powerful than the original Jumo units. What they've done is encase the (also smaller) CJ-610 in a casing which brings the weight and CG of the engine up to the same values as for the Jumo, which means that you don't get any CG issues for the rest of the airplane. It has the added bonus of actually looking like a Jumo when you open the cowlings!
Now the CJ-610 is still a bit more powerful than the Jumo, to cater for this the throttles are fitted with a detent at the point at which the engines equal the Jumo's thrust rating. To get the full GE rated power out of the engine you can push the throttles to the full open position against a spring.
All this means that you can fly the aircraft just as if it was an original with similar weights and thrust ratings, but you can also push the throttles open against the springs and have a bit of extra push when you need it!
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2003, 10:46
  #12 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the escape system. Not sure if the original had a primitive ejection seat. Maybe a modern system would be required in case you need to get out sharpish at high Mach number. What's it got?
Moneyshot is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2003, 17:52
  #13 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Believe the escape system is pop the canopy and jump for the trailing edge of the wing. Will look at the NASM 262 next time I'm over.
Iron City is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2003, 06:58
  #14 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Read somewhere, a long time ago, that the Me 262 had a primitive, cartridge fired ejection seat. Can't remember the source unfortunately.
Doddy Hays' Man in the Hot Seat?
CoodaShooda is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.