Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

'Carpetbaggers' B-24 photo

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

'Carpetbaggers' B-24 photo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2022, 11:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,794
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
'Carpetbaggers' B-24 photo

A relative showed me this photo and I was wondering if anyone could shed any light on it. The B-24 has a (to me) strange nose configuration, I have learned that this was done for the 'Carpetbaggers' airframes. Unfortunately we only know that her father worked in maintenance in the UK during the war, at one time at RAF Wittering, nothing more. Any ideas, thoughts, bits of knowledge are welcome.



Jhieminga is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2022, 12:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
The photo appears to show all RAF personnel, yet the Carpetbaggers, according to Wiki, were used by the USAAF for clandestine ops such as dropping and retrieving secret agents.
Painted all black, the lower pattern of the nose looks like a B24D with its optical 'flat' but with the upper nose turret replaced by the glazed upper part possbly from a B24A.
chevvron is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2022, 16:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Great yarmouth, Norfolk UK
Age: 72
Posts: 640
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
I've a copy of Martin Streetly's book 'The Aircraft of 100 Group' (ISBN 0 7090 1043 5, published in 1984) on the shelf. In the chapter on the B24 he notes that USAAF did operate two squadrons of B24's in the Carpet Bagger role. These were the 857 and 858 Bombardment squadrons. They were used in the jamming and ELINT roles, alongside 100 Group. As they had a close relationship with 100 Group, they were known to have visited their RAF counterparts at RAF Oulton in Norfolk.

The RAF versions had the nose turret disarmed and covered in doped fabric. Photos of USAAF B24's show the gazed nose, similar the B24D's on J model Liberators.

Hope this helps a bit.
bobward is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2022, 16:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Great yarmouth, Norfolk UK
Age: 72
Posts: 640
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
The aircraft in the background looks like an Oxford (?) Lack of markings on the front of the B24 might suggest it's American, rather than RAF.
Looking at the guns in the upper turret, are they flash eliminators or the muzzles?

An interesting picture Jhieminga!
bobward is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2022, 17:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,195
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
An interesting photograph with a quite a few unusual features:

1. There is at least one collar atttached shirt in the photo. RAF shirts were separate collar.
2. Schoolboy in centre front -who is he?
3. Different belt buckles, 3rd from left back row is circular. The other 3 buckles visible are rectangular.
4. Is that 2 tea mugs front extreme right?

It's probably summer which might help narrow the timeframe a bit.

YS
Yellow Sun is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2022, 18:30
  #6 (permalink)  
TCU
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: On BA58/59
Posts: 315
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
According to the "Combat Squadrons of The Air Force, World War II", published by the Department of the Air Force, Office of Air Force History in 1982, the 857th flew Carpetbagging missions between the period 10th August - 16th September 1944 and the 858th flew them between the same dates plus 12th March to 25th April 1945.

The record notes that the 859th also flew Carpetbagging missions during the same 1944 period and also 31st December 1944 to the end of the war in May 1945.

So photo late summer 1944?

The 857th flew the B24, B17, A26, P51 and C47.
The 858th flew the B24, A26, C47 and interestingly the Mosquito in 1945
The 859th flew a proper medley including L49, O-46, O-47, B18, B24, B17, B25 and C47

857th UK bases included North Pickenham, Harrington, Bassingbourne and Alconbury
858th UK bases included North Pickenham, Cheddington and Harrington
859th Uk bases included North Pickenham and Harrington
TCU is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2022, 19:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Forgive me asking, but what's an L49 ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2022, 19:45
  #8 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,637
Received 300 Likes on 168 Posts
Think it would be the Stinson O-49, later L-1 Vigilant.
treadigraph is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2022, 20:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,671
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Try ‘www.donholloway.com/carpetbaggers/index’ for a video...

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 27th Oct 2022 at 05:18. Reason: Try to fix link…🤔
sycamore is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2022, 08:26
  #10 (permalink)  
TCU
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: On BA58/59
Posts: 315
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Forgive me asking, but what's an L49 ?
David, I guess its the Connie

Here is a link to the document I mentioned....the 857th, 858th and 859th details can be found on pages 784-785

https://media.defense.gov/2010/Dec/0...101202-002.pdf


TCU is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2022, 09:15
  #11 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,637
Received 300 Likes on 168 Posts
Originally Posted by TCU
David, I guess its the Connie
The early USAAF Connies were designated the C-69, however the 859th apparently did fly Stinson Vigilants which was the O-49, later redesignated the L-1 so I'd suggest L-49 is a corruption of the two designations.
treadigraph is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2022, 10:16
  #12 (permalink)  
TCU
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: On BA58/59
Posts: 315
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by treadigraph
The early USAAF Connies were designated the C-69, however the 859th apparently did fly Stinson Vigilants which was the O-49, later redesignated the L-1 so I'd suggest L-49 is a corruption of the two designations.
That sounds like a good explanation treadigraph, which seems to be vindicated by the 859th's wiki page
TCU is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2022, 09:35
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,794
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by TCU
David, I guess its the Connie
I will have to go with Treadigraph's explanation as well. Looking at the timeline for the Constellation/C-69's early days, there is no way that it could have been in service in 1943, let alone 1942 as indicated for the 859th.

Thanks everyone for all the interesting information about this photo! After a tip, I have also sent it to the Harrington Aviation Museum to see if they have any thoughts about it. I think it will remain a mystery as to how it relates to an RAF mechanic, but it is unearthing some very interesting aspects!
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2022, 19:26
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Derbyshire
Age: 72
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
I immediately thought Connie too but couldn't make the numbers or timescale work.

The O-49 seems a lot different to all the other aircraft mentioned.
DHfan is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2022, 20:05
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,794
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
The 859th flew anti-submarine patrols from various airfields along the US east coast during 1942 and 1943 before switching to bombing missions in the ETO during 1944. I can see how this led to the 'medley' of types mentioned
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2022, 01:53
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Brfisbane area
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carpetbagger

Originally Posted by chevvron
The photo appears to show all RAF personnel, yet the Carpetbaggers, according to Wiki, were used by the USAAF for clandestine ops such as dropping and retrieving secret agents.
Painted all black, the lower pattern of the nose looks like a B24D with its optical 'flat' but with the upper nose turret replaced by the glazed upper part possbly from a B24A.
It's almost certainly a B-24H, turret removed and replaced with a specially created 'glasshouse'; there are insufficient clues to suggest a serial no. The MG IS equipped with flash reducers/eliminators.
Choccy Lab is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2022, 01:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,952
Received 398 Likes on 210 Posts
The link lists the serial of all Carpetbagger B-24 aircraft, the download link along side each serial contains varying information, some including photos. At a stretch if you go through all the downloads you may find the photo that began the thread. Stranger things have happened.

A side note, pilots preferred the then out of date D model that had the nose as presented in the photo as it allowed a better view for the bombardier when dropping supplies, other aircraft had he standard nose turret. That narrows the photo down to being a B-24D.

http://www.801492.org/Air%20Crew/B24Index.htm

Last edited by megan; 31st Oct 2022 at 02:00. Reason: Detail
megan is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2022, 03:54
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Jhieminga
A relative showed me this photo and I was wondering if anyone could shed any light on it. The B-24 has a (to me) strange nose configuration, I have learned that this was done for the 'Carpetbaggers' airframes. Unfortunately we only know that her father worked in maintenance in the UK during the war, at one time at RAF Wittering, nothing more. Any ideas, thoughts, bits of knowledge are welcome.
Often those old black and white photos show a lot of fine detail under magnification. If the photo is to hand perhaps you could have a look-see and comment on any numbers or words that show up that are not visible on the pixilated computer shot we get to see here.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2022, 08:40
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,794
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
Unfortunately the pixilated view that is here is what's on the print. For some reason this print is not very sharp, perhaps it is a reproduction of another photo. I don't know. I can blow up the photo I took with my phone and you can see the lack of detail in the print.


Thank you for that list megan, I will have a look to see if I can find out something from that.
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2022, 08:59
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,827
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
A side note, pilots preferred the then out of date D model that had the nose as presented in the photo as it allowed a better view for the bombardier when dropping supplies, other aircraft had he standard nose turret. That narrows the photo down to being a B-24D.

http://www.801492.org/Air%20Crew/B24Index.htm
No I would say it is a B-24H - the large glazed nose is more rounded/bulbous to match the size/shape of the removed/deleted turret,the glazing is very different to the earlier models.
I would say it is a specifically built nose section for better visibility during night ops.
There are a couple of pics of B-24H 'Miss Fitts' in the carpetbaggers sources which clearly shows the more rounded profile of this type of glazed nose.
longer ron is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.