Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

MOD spending on BBMF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jun 2022, 12:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MOD spending on BBMF

Interesting link from the Mil forum...

Proposed spending on various items, including 5 years worth of maintenance etc on the BBMF aircraft.
Sums includ £2.5M on new wheels for the Lancaster...




Nige321 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 08:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,469
Received 364 Likes on 213 Posts
I always worry when I see this sort of thing . Opens the door to "how many doctors/nurses/train drivers could we get for this money" crowd.
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 08:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,076
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Maybe they better should build new flight display ones for all the money and keep the originals in museums as national treasures? Remember the Swiss Junkers Ju 52 that had bad corrosion and fatigue deep inside.
Less Hair is online now  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 09:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,087
Received 292 Likes on 163 Posts
Of course we cannot see from the table how many wheels the MOD wants to buy, but £2.5m does sound a tad excessive. Perhaps having tooled up to make them the MOD might be able to recoup some cost by selling replacement for the Canadian based Lancaster as and when they are required.
ATNotts is online now  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 10:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,644
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
ATNotts,

I was thinking the same thing. You could machine them from solid, gold-plate them and still have a few pence left over from £2.5 million!
India Four Two is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 12:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,794
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
They might be able to sell a set to the NX611/Just Jane project as well.
I guess that the originals were machined castings. So you'll need moulds, various test castings, machining to final shape, probably surface treatment and a complete stress evaluation because I'm sure part of the process and/or the materials will not be completely to original spec.
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 13:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Farnborough
Posts: 117
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
3D printer - simples
SimonPaddo is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 17:25
  #8 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,372
Received 118 Likes on 85 Posts
It would be very interesting to see a complete breakdown of the proposed costs and whom they may have in mind as a preferred bidder for the maintenance given the amounts appear to be very lucrative.
Krystal n chips is online now  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 18:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Which cabinet member's sibling, you mean ... ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 18:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,056
Received 2,931 Likes on 1,250 Posts
Originally Posted by ATNotts
Of course we cannot see from the table how many wheels the MOD wants to buy, but £2.5m does sound a tad excessive. Perhaps having tooled up to make them the MOD might be able to recoup some cost by selling replacement for the Canadian based Lancaster as and when they are required.
Not really when it comes down to it, design, metallurgy, tooling, manufacturing, testing, and the all important airworthiness release, I believe the MK1 spitfire props that had to be manufactured came in close to 1 mil per prop.

Last edited by NutLoose; 28th Jun 2022 at 18:53.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 20:30
  #11 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,637
Received 300 Likes on 168 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Not really when it comes down to it, design, metallurgy, tooling, manufacturing, testing, and the all important airworthiness release, I believe the MK1 spitfire props that had to be manufactured came in close to 1 mil per prop.
A long long time back I think I read that the each blade for a MkIX (Dowty Rotol?) was £25k so I can well imagine that price being authentic. As the article said, in an accident the prop is almost always a casualty.

With the Lanc, there are several other potential fliers such as Kermit Weeks' kit of parts (mainly the ex Strathallan/Charles Church KB976 plus parts from several other airframes) if his team can ever get around to them into a whole, and FM104 is potentially going to be restored to fly in Canada (it says here...! ) so spreading the cost a bit more could happen...
treadigraph is online now  
Old 28th Jun 2022, 22:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 494
Received 48 Likes on 15 Posts
I thought the undercarriage had been nicked from a Shackleton? Could they not find some Shak wheels in good nick somewhere to go with the legs?

The £2.5m must have been a quote from B*E

WB627 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2022, 06:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Crawley
Posts: 153
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
A couple of years ago varies organizations were contacted to try to find Mk2 Shack /Lanc wheels. It was known that two or three museums had acquired the remaining stocks of Shack spares when the MOD sold them off. Sadly, I believe that any wheels found were in such poor condition as to be unusable. It may well be that with a number of MK2 Shacks as well as Lancasters still around there is ready market for these wheels. That just leaves the issue of tyres and brake bags.
pmills575 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2022, 07:13
  #14 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,372
Received 118 Likes on 85 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Which cabinet member's sibling, you mean ... ?
Perish the thought.

What would be equally interesting would be to learn the sources that, presumably, provided the quotes for all the published expenditure.

Given the costs mentioned, it would seem unlikely that other operators could afford the outlay with regard to their own types by way of offsetting the costs.

Much as everybody would love to see the BBMF continue to display, unfortunately, aircraft are like humans and to tend to have a finite life span.
Krystal n chips is online now  
Old 29th Jun 2022, 07:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,469
Received 364 Likes on 213 Posts
Many years ago we visited the Rockefeller Auto Museum in Arkansas -. As you can imagine no expense had been spared and all the cars are both immaculate and driven . Asking the guide what was the biggest problem he said "wheels & Tires". Apparently the cost of effectively hand building old wheels and getting replica tyres is UNBELIEVABLE - but then as he said with a smile "Mr Rockefeller is able to afford it..."
Asturias56 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.