Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

Britannia Airways and the Boeing 707

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Britannia Airways and the Boeing 707

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Feb 2022, 08:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 846
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by BSD
Rog747,

I joined Britannia in 1979 and recall flying with a captain who had been involved in the stretched DC-8 project. He would have been the fleet captain if it had gone ahead.
Just how much momentum or traction the project gathered, what the aeroplanes would have been used for or when they would have been bought/leased I can't tell you.
Ah thanks for the info -
1979 was much later in the day of course, and I must say BY and Thomsons were quiet about DC-8's and as to whom it was sourcing a/c from ? -
BY's order and planning from 1979/1980 for new 767-200's to be delivered in early 1984 may have had some effect - as did the 1979 Oil Crisis caused by the depose of the Shah of Iran.

I cannot think of any holiday markets at that time (1979) that Thomsons or BY were looking at to warrant flying DC-8 63's - Maybe Mombasa and again back to the Caribbean >?
It would be more than 10 years on before the 767's would start flying to such far away places, and the 767ER also began regular charter flights to MCO etc, and also, initially from LTN to Australia, as well as to New Zealand the following year.

British Midland striving at this time to obtain scheduled route licences to fly from LHR to the USA were also looking at DC-8 63's, but in 1981 decided to fully refurbish it's 3 707C's with new seats/galleys and a wide-look cabin interior, with a view to use these as a stop gap if the CAA awarded the lucrative NYC routes (That never happened) but the 3 smart a/c ended up on Summer IT's to the Med and the Canarias, plus USA and Canada charter flights, with weekend Ski flights in the winter. They flew from 1982 until sold in 1985.
BMA must have spent a lot of money on these 3 refurb's - one of which was converting an ex Pan Am 707-321C, a pure new build cargo/freighter 707 to a Pax a/c.

WHBM, mentions the Caledonian AW 707C fleet, and about Caledonian's Mediterranean IT charterers, of which yes, were almost wholly flown from 1969 on their 3, then 4 new One-Eleven 500s, from GLA, MAN and LGW. (Caledonian still used their Britannia's until 1970)
Their 707's flew IT's mostly at peak summer weekends usually on W patterns from LGW to PMI, IBZ and ALC. The W's were to MAN or GLA, back to LGW, usually on alternate fortnights.
Delays often built up over the weekend.
Tenerife (TCI) was usually for Horizon weekly on a Sunday from LGW, and to both RHO and NIC (Cyprus) were also flown on the 707 for Horizon and Wings.
When BCAL was formed these Med 707 IT's seemed to stop in the main, except the TCI and NIC.
They flew these shorter 707 IT's from summer 1968 to peaking in 1970/1971 then only a few after 1972, usually PMI, with the TCI staying on until Horizon was bought by Court Line.

Mooncrest,
mentions how the 707 cornered the UK market for long-haul capable narrow body passenger jets - whereas in the USA and Canada the DC-8 and DC-8 Stretch was the most popular type used by the affinity group charter airlines, such as ONA Seaboard Loftleidir Universal Saturn AFA TIA Airlift and Capitol, with CP Air in Canada.
World and Wardair used 707C's, as did International Air Bahama at first, who switched to a DC-8, as did World AW and Airlift re-equipping with DC-8 63PF's.
rog747 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2022, 09:25
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,589
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
mentions how the 707 cornered the UK market for long-haul capable narrow body passenger jets -
Was the DC-8 certified in the UK until IAS got their freighters much later? Similarly, the earlier reference to Britannia getting 727's, the 727 wasn't CAA certified until Dan Air did a lot of work to get theirs on the register?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2022, 13:17
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 846
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
Was the DC-8 certified in the UK until IAS got their freighters much later?
Similarly, the earlier reference to Britannia getting 727's, the 727 wasn't CAA certified until Dan Air did a lot of work to get theirs on the register?
Don't know much about the first DC-8's on the UK Register save for the fact of the order for 3 new DC-8 63CF's for Lloyd International due in 1968.
Lloyd went on to acquire 3 707's from 1970.

G- Axxx
DC‑8‑63CF 46062 05/08/1969 Lloyd Int'l AW -- NTU Acquisition cancelled (to Airlift International N6163A)
G-Axxx
DC‑8‑63CF 46061 03/07/1969 Lloyd Int'l AW -- NTU Acquisition cancelled (to Airlift International N6162A)
G-Axxx
DC‑8‑63CF 45969 20/08/1968 Lloyd Int'l AW -- NTU Acquisition cancelled (to Airlift International N6161A)

Not sure when Britannia AW was looking at the 727 ''officially'' - guess that was around 1966/67 as the first new 737's came in July 1968?
Court Line were reported looking at new 727-200 and the DC-8 63
Dan Air's first 3 727-100 arrived in the UK for summer 1973 with extra mod's required for CAA certification.
BMA looked at 3 727-100 before the DC-9 was acquired in 1976.
rog747 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2022, 20:09
  #24 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,654
Received 314 Likes on 174 Posts
Rog747, I've said it before, you have an excellent book to write in there somewhere, all ancient history these days but bu@@er me it's utterly fascinating. I really would go back in a heartbeat.

Airlift DC-8s I recall seeing, was there a CIA connection?
treadigraph is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2022, 20:22
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,589
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
Dan Air's first 3 727-100 arrived in the UK for summer 1973 with extra mod's required for CAA certification.
Just looked at G-INFO and it looks like '74. Didn't realise it was that early, later in my head!
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2022, 20:30
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by rog747
the 707 cornered the UK market for long-haul capable narrow body passenger jets - whereas in the USA and Canada the DC-8 and DC-8 Stretch was the most popular type used by the affinity group charter airlines, such as ONA Seaboard Loftleidir Universal Saturn AFA TIA Airlift and Capitol, with CP Air in Canada.
World and Wardair used 707C's, as did International Air Bahama at first, who switched to a DC-8, as did World AW and Airlift re-equipping with DC-8 63PF's.
Truth is the initial DC-8s, before the -60 series, were rather poor aircraft, and depreciated with their original purchasers quite quickly. Had it not been for Douglas going for the big -60 series revamp it probably would have been finished production by the mid-1960s. Boeing back in the 1950s had bought their own wind tunnel (for tax reasons it was ostensibly owned by the University of Washington in Seattle), whereas Donald Douglas didn't invest in one, and just bought time on the NASA etc tunnels. The DC-8 had a series of both high and low speed aerodynamic inefficiencies which really should have come out at the design stage, the most surprising being discovering it cruised better with a little 1 degree of flap set rather than zero. It wasn't until the DC8-62 wing that they finally got a good design there. Boeing had all their B-47/B-52/KC-135 experience to fall back on.

Of course, there was a lot of prior UK experience, both aircrew and engineering, from BOAC initially selecting the 707, then British Eagle doing so from the Eagle-Cunard-BOAC tieup, Eagle going under and personnel becoming available (particularly at Laker), the DC-8 not being UK certified, etc.

In the USA the buildup to the Vietnam war saw several mainstream US carriers buy significant 707-320C fleets specifically for this - Pan Am, Braniff and Continental particularly. Just as they took delivery the DC8-63F came along, the Defence Department liked this better, and placed a whole range of contracts, not with mainstream carriers but with the supplementals, who until then had staggered along with old cheap Connies and such like. They all placed orders for the new Big Doug as specified, which their salesmen readily signed up; the resulting production meltdown at Long Beach and some inappropriate subcontracting which didn't work was one of the key reasons for the end of Douglas independence. These also took over all the US military traffic to Europe, principally Germany, which the many commercial transatlantic charters were very integrated with in aircraft scheduling, often just being back-hauls to military work.
WHBM is online now  
Old 22nd Feb 2022, 20:34
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
It goes without saying that whichever airline introduced the 727 to the British register would have paid the certification costs (I think that's the rule). But, bearing in mind that Dan Air's first 727s were the 100 series, it's likely that Britannia would have opted for the then current production model, i .e. the Advanced 200. I don't know if the CAA required any modifications to this variant. In any event, it was again Dan Air that introduced the 200 to the UK in about 1980.

Weren't the 707 and 727, and all their derivatives and variants, fantastic aeroplanes ?
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2022, 22:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by rog747
Dan Air's first 3 727-100 arrived in the UK for summer 1973 with extra mod's required for CAA certification.
Just to be specific, a key mod the UK CAA required, the insertion of an extra door in the fuselage, was not a 727 issue per-se, but was because of the high seat count Dan-Air was going to put into them compared to their previous usage on scheduled services in Japan.

I wonder Channel Airways never got hit with the same when they put the 4+3 across seating into the Trident.
WHBM is online now  
Old 23rd Feb 2022, 05:27
  #29 (permalink)  
TCU
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: On BA58/59
Posts: 315
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Mooncrest
It goes without saying that whichever airline introduced the 727 to the British register would have paid the certification costs (I think that's the rule). But, bearing in mind that Dan Air's first 727s were the 100 series, it's likely that Britannia would have opted for the then current production model, i .e. the Advanced 200. I don't know if the CAA required any modifications to this variant. In any event, it was again Dan Air that introduced the 200 to the UK in about 1980.

Weren't the 707 and 727, and all their derivatives and variants, fantastic aeroplanes ?
The D.P. Davies Royal Aviation Society audio interviews provide a fascinating record of both the 707 and 727 UK certifications
TCU is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2022, 07:55
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 846
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
I guess this post should be in 'Boeing 727 Holiday jets'....

Originally Posted by SWBKCB
Just looked at G-INFO and it looks like '74. Didn't realise it was that early, later in my head!
Dan Air 727's -
The first trio from JAL were all flown into the UK during Q4 1972 - Not sure where the extra door Mods were done> Boeing?

They all certainly were on the airline's books to fly holiday IT's as 146 seaters from Spring 1973 - seating was pretty tight.
I was invited on a LGW-PMI-LGW Fam Day trip at that time (by Intasun I think)
The 727 was due to do a W from PMI to MAN and back, giving us a full day in Majorca.
We were so horrendously delayed by ATC on the ground at LGW after boarding that we got off and did not bother to go!

The second pair of ex JAL 727's came in 1974 - one was G-BDAN, lost on let down to TCI 4/1980 (Thomas Cook Holidays flight MAN-TCI)
All of these 5 727-046 were the only one's that got the extra rear Type 1 doors fitted to enable over the 150 pax limit.

The 6th a/c came from Burma in 1976 (built for Pacific AL)
The next pair, ex Delta/Northeast AL, came in 1977.
These 3 were not modified and seated 131 pax - these often flew IT's for West German tourists from the Berlin TXL base.

In 1974 TSA Transair Sweden offered their 3 727-134 to DA, but chose to merge and then sell them to SAS/Scanair.
These 3 727's had very high hours, and 1 was a 727-134C with a higher empty weight.

Other 727-100 IT operators in Europe were -->
Condor from 1965. (Lufthansa a/c also)
Icelandair - Flugfelag Islands used theirs on IT's from 1967.
Sabena flying for Sobelair from 1967.
Hapag Lloyd also bought some from Japan (and 1 from Sabena) starting in 1972 and had 8 on fleet by 1976.
plus Pan Am from Berlin TXL at weekends.

I guess this post should be in 'Boeing 727 Holiday jets'....SWBKCB

rog747 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2022, 08:52
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 846
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
Just to be specific, a key mod the UK CAA required, the insertion of an extra door in the fuselage, was not a 727 issue per-se, but was because of the high seat count Dan-Air was going to put into them -
I wonder Channel Airways never got hit with the same when they put the 4+3 across seating into the Trident.
The Channel Tridents had four Type 1 doors with slides, and four over wing exits, and at 139 seats, did not exceed 149 pax which I think was, and still is an important exit number cut off.
I think the Trident One E-140 was allowed up to a max of 149 pax>?
(One more door than a Trident 2)

The Trident 3B, stretched for up to 180 seats, had five doors, including now one door placed aft, however just two, but larger over wing exits.
BEA/BA deactivated the mid cabin service door - but it was there.
They were up to > 140Y.
Later BA Shuttle a/c were 146Y

The 727-100 had only two Type 1 doors and four over wing exits - 131-134 pax was the norm for them. (They had the rear air stairs too but this was not a main exit?)
rog747 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2022, 09:43
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As regards exit door limits, 4 main doors and one overwing exit each side meant a maximum of 149 seats (and still does). When Monarch bought Boeing 720Bs from Northwest with this layout, they had them modified at Boeing Wichita with an extra overwing exit each side (as on the 707 and which had always been an option, rarely specified, on the 720). This meant they could put as many seats as they could fit in up to the legal maximum for this layout of 189.
Alan Baker is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2022, 17:25
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by TCU
The D.P. Davies Royal Aviation Society audio interviews provide a fascinating record of both the 707 and 727 UK certifications
Notably, although Davies' classic text "Handling the Big Jets" is titled generically, about what was being introduced in the early 1960s when it was published, it seems to be wholly about the 707 - which of course is the type he was involved with. Somehow I get the impression that the 707 was more of a handful than the DC8, especially in upsets, but overall was the better design, and it would be interesting to discuss why.

We used to have a fascinating experienced poster here, 411A (named after his personal Cessna light aircraft) who had both 707 and DC8 past experience, as well as his all-time favourite Tristar, and who would leapt at such a comparison, but I'm afraid he headed for the heavens some years ago, a sad loss to all.
WHBM is online now  
Old 24th Feb 2022, 15:39
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mind you, during the 70s (when this would have been happening) Britannia engineering looked after the IAS DC-8s, which came to Luton for their hangar visits.

Britiannia scrapped a Zambian registered DC-8 (9J-ABR) at LTN during the roasting Summer of 1976. IAS had purchased it for spares...
boeing_eng is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2022, 15:54
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by boeing_eng
Mind you, during the 70s (when this would have been happening) Britannia engineering looked after the IAS DC-8s, which came to Luton for their hangar visits.

Britiannia scrapped a Zambian registered DC-8 (9J-ABR) at LTN during the roasting Summer of 1976. IAS had purchased it for spares...
I remember the Zambian DC-8. It had been parked at Bournemouth for a while. I think it was ex Alitalia srs.40 with RR Conways.
dixi188 is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2022, 17:33
  #36 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,654
Received 314 Likes on 174 Posts
Correct, 9J-ABR was ex Alitalia. An educational moment; I either didn't know or had forgotten the DC-8 43s had Conways!
treadigraph is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2022, 20:26
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by treadigraph
Correct, 9J-ABR was ex Alitalia. An educational moment; I either didn't know or had forgotten the DC-8 43s had Conways!
Douglas had a go at changing over a couple of DC8-40s they had taken in part exchange to Pratt & Whitneys (thus DC8-50s). Apparently cost too much, and didn't work out well at all. More different than one might think. Elements such as the engine mounts on the wing had been done differently for the two engines.

I think the only secondhand sale of any consequence of them was Air Canada selling a couple to Cubana, avoiding issues with US engines when there was a US sales ban on P&W spares to Cuba.
WHBM is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.