M-B Meteors
Thread Starter
M-B Meteors
I was very privileged to attend a visit to Martin-Baker yesterday, which included their activities at Chalgrove aerodrome. Both Meteors flew, giving a polished exhibition of graceful formation flying. A wonderful sight (and sound)!
Are M-B's Meteors now the only airworthy examples still flying in the UK? Long may they continue to do so!
Are M-B's Meteors now the only airworthy examples still flying in the UK? Long may they continue to do so!
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,619
Received 294 Likes
on
162 Posts
Thread on Spectators Balcony about Canberras seen over Oxford on Monday revealed that they were the M-B Meteors. The ex-Doug Arnold NF.11 G-LOSM/WM167 still has a valid permit though I believe it may now be inactive.
Do you know who was flying them?
Do you know who was flying them?
Thread Starter
I do know who the pilots were, but it is inappropriate to name names on a public forum without their permission.
I'm sure that if you had a valid reason to ask, M-B could tell you.
I'm sure that if you had a valid reason to ask, M-B could tell you.
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,619
Received 294 Likes
on
162 Posts
Just vulgar curiosity.
Are M-B's Meteors now the only airworthy examples still flying in the UK
https://aviationmuseum.com.au/gloster-meteor-f-8/
Thread Starter
Good to know that VZ467 'Winston' is still flying - it was the late 'Puddy' Catt's favourite mount back in the '70s when he was towing targets for us at RAF Brawdy.
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At what point to these Meteor's become just uneconomical / dangerous to keep airworthy? Surprised that by now they have not switched to something like a couple of surplus Hawk's for example.
Plus how cost effective is it for M-B to continue to maintain their own airfield when for the amount of flying they do they could surely set up residence at somewhere like Northolt, Benson, Farnborough, Odiham etc - all of those being within a 15-45 minute drive from their HQ at Denham.
Plus how cost effective is it for M-B to continue to maintain their own airfield when for the amount of flying they do they could surely set up residence at somewhere like Northolt, Benson, Farnborough, Odiham etc - all of those being within a 15-45 minute drive from their HQ at Denham.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,842 Likes
on
1,213 Posts
At what point to these Meteor's become just uneconomical / dangerous to keep airworthy? Surprised that by now they have not switched to something like a couple of surplus Hawk's for example.
Plus how cost effective is it for M-B to continue to maintain their own airfield when for the amount of flying they do they could surely set up residence at somewhere like Northolt, Benson, Farnborough, Odiham etc - all of those being within a 15-45 minute drive from their HQ at Denham.
Plus how cost effective is it for M-B to continue to maintain their own airfield when for the amount of flying they do they could surely set up residence at somewhere like Northolt, Benson, Farnborough, Odiham etc - all of those being within a 15-45 minute drive from their HQ at Denham.
The problem you have is a Hawk is a single engine, so when you bang out a seat the engine ingests all that lovely smoke and debris, not an ideal outcome, that is why the meteor is still in use, it is a reliable, strong aircraft, with wing mounted engines out of the way of the smoke ingestion, stronger more damage resistant engines being centrifugal, has a speed range suitable for testing most seats... If you write a spec for a tandem seat, twin engine wing pod mounted aircraft, rugged and simple to operate with a sufficent speed range to carry out the tests you come back to the Meteor, there simply isn't anything else out there.
Last edited by NutLoose; 18th Aug 2019 at 23:01.
At what point to these Meteor's become just uneconomical / dangerous to keep airworthy? Surprised that by now they have not switched to something like a couple of surplus Hawk's for example.
Plus how cost effective is it for M-B to continue to maintain their own airfield when for the amount of flying they do they could surely set up residence at somewhere like Northolt, Benson, Farnborough, Odiham etc - all of those being within a 15-45 minute drive from their HQ at Denham.
Plus how cost effective is it for M-B to continue to maintain their own airfield when for the amount of flying they do they could surely set up residence at somewhere like Northolt, Benson, Farnborough, Odiham etc - all of those being within a 15-45 minute drive from their HQ at Denham.
.M B were supposed to re-equip with Hawks back in the '80s but it just never happened. I saw it on a list of aircraft allocated to the (what was then) MOD(PE) fleet.
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Langford Lodge - where the other MB operations are based and the test sled too?
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,619
Received 294 Likes
on
162 Posts
Think Nutty meant to type "single engined"...
In 2017 Aviation Week published an article about M-B's two Meteors, with some interesting quotes from their chief pilot and their marketing director:-
"In spite of its considerable vintage, the sturdy British attack aircraft has all the attributes required for a stable, high-speed test platform" says Andy Gent, Martin-Baker’s head of flying and chief pilot. “From a test perspective the Meteor is ideal. The tail boom is fairly long and the fin is not very high. The engines are also spaced out a fair way out along the wing, so the efflux from the ejection test and exhaust from the gun and rocket motor isn’t potentially going down the engine intakes,” he says.
Based at Martin-Baker’s Chalgrove, England, test facility, the fleet is made up of two Meteors, WA638 and WL419, both of which have been with the company since the 1960s. “They are doing the job so why would you ever go through the heartache of getting another aircraft?” says Gent.
In short, it does not fly all too much, it gets the job done and its well built. Similar reason most older aircraft are still flying these days.
The article goes on to say that they have little intention of changing this any time soon:
Marketing Director Andrew Martin notes the company is one of only a handful that performs airborne ejection tests, and that the Meteor will continue to be used for the foreseeable future. “It is a tough thing to evaluate, and right now while we have these phenomenal assets we are not going to really think about a replacement in great detail,” he says. With the final retirement of the last Royal Air Force (RAF)-operated aircraft in the target towing role in the early 1980s, Martin-Baker acquired a large stock of spares and Rolls-Royce Derwent 8 turbojets. Because of that and the ample remaining airframe life, the company is no rush to find a successor.
"In spite of its considerable vintage, the sturdy British attack aircraft has all the attributes required for a stable, high-speed test platform" says Andy Gent, Martin-Baker’s head of flying and chief pilot. “From a test perspective the Meteor is ideal. The tail boom is fairly long and the fin is not very high. The engines are also spaced out a fair way out along the wing, so the efflux from the ejection test and exhaust from the gun and rocket motor isn’t potentially going down the engine intakes,” he says.
Based at Martin-Baker’s Chalgrove, England, test facility, the fleet is made up of two Meteors, WA638 and WL419, both of which have been with the company since the 1960s. “They are doing the job so why would you ever go through the heartache of getting another aircraft?” says Gent.
In short, it does not fly all too much, it gets the job done and its well built. Similar reason most older aircraft are still flying these days.
The article goes on to say that they have little intention of changing this any time soon:
Marketing Director Andrew Martin notes the company is one of only a handful that performs airborne ejection tests, and that the Meteor will continue to be used for the foreseeable future. “It is a tough thing to evaluate, and right now while we have these phenomenal assets we are not going to really think about a replacement in great detail,” he says. With the final retirement of the last Royal Air Force (RAF)-operated aircraft in the target towing role in the early 1980s, Martin-Baker acquired a large stock of spares and Rolls-Royce Derwent 8 turbojets. Because of that and the ample remaining airframe life, the company is no rush to find a successor.
"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
we should cut Nutty some slack.
- (UK) A cheap fuel consisting of slack (coal dust) and small lumps of coal (nuts).
