Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Firecracker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Aug 2019, 13:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Surrey
Age: 66
Posts: 211
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Firecracker

I think I remember seeing a Britten Norman Firecracker in a hangar at Goodwood in the late 70s.Wiki tells me that eventually a total of 4 were built.Does anyone know what happened to them ? Are there any survivors ?
ex82watcher is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2019, 14:02
  #2 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,670
Received 327 Likes on 180 Posts
That would have been the prototype, G-NDNI, which ended up in the USA as N182FR. The three Turbo Firecrackers built for Specialist Flying Training as G-SFTR, S and T also ended up in the States. They all seemed to be airworthy in 2015.
treadigraph is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2019, 14:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,826
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
In '86 or '87, I met Des Norman at Fairoaks where he had brought the Firecracker for the RAAF to evaluate it, the RAF having already ordered a modified Tucano so as to provide jobs in N Ireland.
Very nice guy to talk to.
chevvron is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2019, 14:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,826
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by ex82watcher
I think I remember seeing a Britten Norman Firecracker in a hangar at Goodwood in the late 70s.Wiki tells me that eventually a total of 4 were built.Does anyone know what happened to them ? Are there any survivors ?
No 'Britten' in the Firecracker; it and the Fieldmaster were both designed by Des on his own and built and test flown from Goodwood.
Don't forget the Firecracker originally had a 6 cyl Lycoming 0-540 piston engine before re-engining with the PT6..
chevvron is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 16:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I recall the story that on A&AEE evaluation of the Tucano, PC-9 and Firecracker at Boscombe Down, one pilot wrote that "entry to the Firecracker's cockpit was difficult and should be made impossible"!

For the record, there were two rounds of evaluations and that was where Desmond Norman went wrong: the other two aircraft manufacturers had modified their offerings after the first round so that they could actually be tested at the second, whereas Norman had simply produced the paper details of the modifications that could be made.
possel is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 16:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
"entry to the Firecracker's cockpit was difficult and should be made impossible"!
Allegedly first spoken about the Blackburn Botha and reportedly repeated many times since!
Haraka is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 16:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Diamond AB (CEH2)
Posts: 6,645
Received 75 Likes on 46 Posts
I’ve seen the words “ergonomic slum” used a few times, to describe the cockpits of British aircraft!
India Four Two is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 17:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,826
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by possel
I recall the story that on A&AEE evaluation of the Tucano, PC-9 and Firecracker at Boscombe Down, one pilot wrote that "entry to the Firecracker's cockpit was difficult and should be made impossible"!

For the record, there were two rounds of evaluations and that was where Desmond Norman went wrong: the other two aircraft manufacturers had modified their offerings after the first round so that they could actually be tested at the second, whereas Norman had simply produced the paper details of the modifications that could be made.
Des told me the RAF wanted to be able to see 250kt indicated in level flight, so Embraer carried out many 'mods' to the standard production airframe to fit the Garrett TPE 331 to achieve this giving it that ugly bulge under the nose.
Dunno what Pilatus did.
chevvron is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 17:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
Des told me the RAF wanted to be able to see 250kt indicated in level flight
Yes, I recall that the Tucanos built by Shorts for the RAF had to be capable of 240 kts.

Apparently RAF single-seat pilots can only navigate when flying at a whole number of nautical miles per minute.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 19:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Yes, I recall that the Tucanos built by Shorts for the RAF had to be capable of 240 kts.

Apparently RAF single-seat pilots can only navigate when flying at a whole number of nautical miles per minute.
As in a number divisible by 60, you mean (nm per minute)

It was actually the specification's time to height climb (15,000ft in six minutes IIRC) which was the driving force (no pun intended) behind the TPE331 replacing the PT6 in the Tucano - even then it took 6 mins 40 or something like that. NB The JP took over 15 minutes!
possel is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 19:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Of NDN-1 Firecrackers
Some distant background here.
Hope it helps
Be lucky
David
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2019, 13:21
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,680
Received 71 Likes on 45 Posts
Possel,slight correction; JP3+TIPS 11-12.5 min.-15K
JP4 7-8,18.5 m-35k
JP5/5A 7-8m..18m-30k
Strikey clean;3.5-15k, 8.5m-30k
All civvy ones,even with lighter nav/radios ,a/c are ballasted due to Cof G limits..
sycamore is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2021, 20:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London
Age: 67
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An extremely nice guy - gave me my first job working on the prototype as a trainee. Someone who had eternal optimism and never seemed to let life get him down.
Mustique is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2021, 15:16
  #14 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
There is (was?, no longer listed on their website so possibly retired or sold on) a Firecracker, I thought the last remaining airworthy one but could be mistaken, in use at the National Test Pilot School in Mojave as a test pilot training aeroplane.

G
Genghis the Engineer is online now  
Old 31st Aug 2021, 21:40
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 687
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ISTR Air Atlantique optimistically had a number of Firecracker fuselages in a Coventry hangar in the 1990s in quite good condition. I don't suppose any of them will fly.
Dan Dare is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2021, 08:08
  #16 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,670
Received 327 Likes on 180 Posts
They definitely Firecrackers, Dan? I have a vague memory of somebody holding several incomplete Fieldmasters or NAC1s in a Midlands hangar
treadigraph is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2021, 16:58
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,826
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Des wasn't one for 'rushing' things and when he first flew the Fieldmaster from Sandown in December 1981, he had already arranged a 'rollout' ceremony; for Farnborough that same afternoon!
The weather was pretty grotty, cloud about 1,200 ft amd I didn't think he'd make it in to us.
First I heard was a faint burst of carrier wave accompanied by a d/f trace. I didn't think it was him because the d/f trace showed somewhere in the vicinity of Andover rather than from the expected direction of Sandown but I transmitted 'blind' to try to get 2-way with him and ended up getting him to fly along the railway line from Andover towards Farnborough.
I never asked him how he'd got where he was and didn't intend to, but eventually he got the airfield in sight and after landing they put the aircraft in 'A' Shed (which was next to the control tower) so that the groundcrew could 'ceremonialy' open the doors and wheel the aircraft out.
In 1982, or it could have been later, he flew it at the Farnborough Airshow, the one snag being he wasn't allowed to demonstrate it during the display as SBAC didn't want him dumping a load of water on the airfield.
chevvron is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2021, 22:28
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,832
Received 277 Likes on 112 Posts
I was at a mate's wedding on 25th Aug 1984 and was enjoying the reception at the Langdale Chase Hotel on Ambleside. At one point a pair of Firecrappers flew up the lake at low level - I gather they were being used for training Iraqi air force pilots by 'Specialist Flight Training' at Carlisle? "Fly past is on time", I quipped...

Boscombe TPs weren't very impressed by the wretched thing. But the Tucano, PC-9, Turbo Firecracker and the paper Australian proposal were all SO slow compared with good old JP5!!
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Sep 2021, 18:00
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Station 42
Age: 69
Posts: 1,081
Received 93 Likes on 39 Posts
I had several photos of those airframes in Coventry's AAT/Air Atlantique Hangar 7 in 1999 but they got lost by a second-rate shipping company in one of my moves.
stevef is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2021, 19:16
  #20 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,670
Received 327 Likes on 180 Posts
Definitely incomplete NAC-1 Freenlances at Coventry as in pics on this site:

https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/thr...h-query.24773/
treadigraph is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.