Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Canberra PR9?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Feb 2018, 11:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Canberra PR9?

Hello All

Have often wondered about the Canberra PR9, with the nose opening out for the navigator to get in & out, did the nose ever come detached during flight as it didn't look very secure when open. Was there a height restriction for this position as there didn't look to be much room inside.

Cheers
Glider 90
GLIDER 90 is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2018, 20:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oxford
Age: 85
Posts: 458
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
With nose "Open" it was not very secure (relatively) but when "Closed & locked" there was no problem that I was aware of (but I sat slightly higher and under a canopy!). As for height restriction I was not aware of any, navigators came in all shapes and sizes (As did pilots in those halcyon days!!)

58 forever!!!

Bill
Bill Macgillivray is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2018, 21:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SOMEWHERE
Posts: 289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PR9

At Marham def no size requirement ! Looked a tight squeeze for some but bloody Closter phobic !!
scarecrow450 is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2018, 23:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southwater
Age: 73
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I once read that the PR9 was the fastest non afterburning jet that the R.A.F. operated. Is that/was that correct?
RedhillPhil is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2018, 07:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedhillPhil
I once read that the PR9 was the fastest non afterburning jet that the R.A.F. operated. Is that/was that correct?
Dunno about fastest, but probably the highest flying.

They could definitly exceed the operational limits of the Green Satin doppler navigator.

When I had the GS bench at Akrotiri, 13 Sqdn were snagging kit as 'Unlocking at height', and it all tested out fine on the bench.
When I visited the Sqdn and spoke with a Nav or two, the snags stopped.
ian16th is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2018, 13:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Derbyshire
Age: 72
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by RedhillPhil
I once read that the PR9 was the fastest non afterburning jet that the R.A.F. operated. Is that/was that correct?
Depends if you insist on level flight amongst other things. A Victor went briefly supersonic over Paris. The Canberra was a brilliant aircraft but it was the wrong shape for that. At least, I can't imagine it would be possible it could go supersonic.
DHfan is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2018, 17:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southwater
Age: 73
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I didn't mention supersonic. I suppose I should have mentioned, "...fastest subsonic jet". I'm aware that on at least two occasions that I know of one of Fred's finest went supersonic.
RedhillPhil is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2018, 08:20
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Morning All

Thanks for the replys, much appreciated.

Cheers
Glider 90
GLIDER 90 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.