Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

Fabric Control Surfaces

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Fabric Control Surfaces

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2002, 00:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fabric Control Surfaces

I've noticed that a lot of aircraft built in the later war years and maybe post-war when technology had made huge leaps continued to be built with fabric covered elevators and rudders. Examples that spring to mind include DC-3/C47, Hawker Tempest, Winjeel (I think). Can anyone shed some light on the reasons for me?
Cheers
dghob is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2002, 08:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 91 Posts
Easy-peasy repair technology coupled with large stocks of madapolam and dope!
Cornish Jack is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2002, 10:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,125
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Post

Fabric covered controls are probably lighter and hence easier to mass balance. Also the technology is well understood.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2002, 22:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not entirely convinced yet - metal control surfaces seem like a logical thing to have when the rest of the plane is metal, solid & harder to damage, no more difficult or time consuming to build than fabric covered (possibly less so). To confuse me even further Aeronca were putting metal ailerons on their C-3 when the whole of the rest of the plane was fabric covered...
I have control is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2002, 17:01
  #5 (permalink)  
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Floatin' on th' Black Pig, Yarr!
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fabric control surfaces are fine for low speed aircraft but tend to balloon at higher speeds, leading to aerodynmic problems. By ballooning I mean that the control surface inflates and loses its aerodynamic integrity. There is a lot of coverege of this (in easily understood laymen's terms) in Jeffrey Quill's book "Spitfire" regarding the period that Supermarine looked into the problem of trying to recover a spitfire from a high speed dive by the sheer brute strength of the pilot.
I would recommend Spitfire to anyone who wants an enjoyable and highly educational read.
maninblack is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2002, 05:14
  #6 (permalink)  
Safety First!
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Fabric surfaces were easier to repair after combat damage and damage to the fabric skin was less likely to risk structural failure to the rest of the airframe as in the case of aircraft such as the Spitfire where a semi-monocoque frame shared loads with the metal stressed skin. The fabric covered Hurricane for instance, was able to absorb a lot more hits from an enemy than the all metal Spitfire, especially in the case of hits by cannon shells.

As for control surfaces being fabric covered, I believe they were simple to manufacture (having skilled people and knowledge in these fields from the earlier days) and the ease of manufacture using cheap materials and construction methods outweighed the problems with purchasing and developing new metal working tools and rigs in wartime. Control surfaces made of wood and fabric were also very light and easy to balance, but as was said, did have disadvantages at high speeds.

It is interesting to note that a lot of (in particular German) aircraft were using fabric covered controls surfaces late in the war to save time in the manufacturing processes when the need for warplane numbers outweighed the need for very high quality construction.

Kermie
Kermit 180 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2002, 17:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey Shore
Age: 92
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the early Hawker carrier fighters had fabric control surfaces. I got a look at it when she came aboard the Old WASP.

It was a baby carriage to fly, according to the pilot.
I. M. Esperto is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2002, 14:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fabric

dont forget that canberras have a wooden fin leading edge which is linen covered. does anyone know if b57s and aussie ones had the same?
canberra is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.