Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

BABS Beam Approach Beacon System

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

BABS Beam Approach Beacon System

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Feb 2015, 22:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BABS Beam Approach Beacon System

How low, realistically could, or would, BABS approaches be flown to?

Or put in modern terms what was the system minima?
PaulFrank is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2015, 07:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Kalgoorlie, W.A. , Australia
Age: 86
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
300ft, 1 mile.
No altitude information but distance seemed pretty accurate down to zero. It was possible for the beam to deflected.

Last edited by Pom Pax; 16th Feb 2015 at 07:13. Reason: add a bit
Pom Pax is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2015, 07:45
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is pretty impressive. Thanks for the information.
PaulFrank is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2015, 09:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I serviced it circa 1954 at Lindholme.

As an aside, I learnt to drive on the BABS Van! It was the 1st vehicle I ever drove. A Standard 9 with a 3 speed crash gearbox.
ian16th is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2015, 10:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: humzaland
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pom Pax

When BABS was around did our masters set a minimum vis? My memory is that we just came down to the 300ft DH (should have been a mile out) and if you - or more likely in grotty WX your trusty observer - could see a light or two you kept going.
binbrook is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2015, 16:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Kalgoorlie, W.A. , Australia
Age: 86
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
binbrook I am sure you are 100% correct, I only called out the numbers. I recall on an approach against a low watery winter Sun faithfully doing my commentary against back chat of "Can't see a thing" and repeat until at 1 mile, "There's the Royal Oak, ok nav."
I suspect when first introduced Babs was the best thing since sliced bread and Harris' brave boys often had no option but to continue until they saw something. Even well into the fifties GCA was a luxury not available to every station.

p.s. "Can't see a thing" was truthfully the sanitised version. Obviously visual from the pub to home.

Last edited by Pom Pax; 16th Feb 2015 at 18:30. Reason: ps
Pom Pax is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2015, 02:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
The TBA, the same as BABS but you had a coffee-grinder frequency changer, was in service at Tern Hill in 1960. You found, or were directed by ATC using CADF, to the overhead cone of silence. Once there you followed the procedure and there was an outer and an inner marker.

The 'beam' was audio and on finals at Ternhill you turned right on the 'A's and left on the 'N's. The mix, a continous note was heard when on the centre line. 300 ft rings a bell and flying dual one would be told to look up just as you passed over the hedge at about 50 feet.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2015, 09:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fife
Age: 87
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TBA, the same as BABS but you had a coffee-grinder frequency changer, was in service at Tern Hill
We had it at Feltwell, too. My last Provost flight (03 Aug 55) shows as 55 minutes solo including 40 minutes IF, this consisted entirely of "beam approaches".
NutherA2 is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2015, 11:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Is this the same as 'SBA'? Or is the difference that BABS was equipped with 'fan markers' to give dft info?
chevvron is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2015, 12:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
TBA/SBA both had fan markers. The reason for the 'fan' was so that somebody who was struggling to sort out the drift to stay on the centre line had a fighting chance of hearing it went he went past. IIRC passing the inner marker without a steady noise was a mandatory overshoot.

I saw the poor old BABS van at Aldergrove being crushed by a Halifax in about 1949. The van fought back by removing the port oleo resulting in the Halifax sliding along the runway sans mainwheel and attachments. As the Halifaxes were approaching the end of their service life it was then a one way trip to the dump.

Halifax 1 BABS Van 1

Last edited by Fareastdriver; 17th Feb 2015 at 21:13.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2015, 13:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 792
Received 34 Likes on 11 Posts
"When BABS was around did our masters set a minimum vis? "

As I recall, the R.A.F. did not require a minimum vis until the mid 70's.
oxenos is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2015, 13:38
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: humzaland
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BABS gave range as well as left/right indications and I don't recall any markers. QGH down to 1500ft and at 5 miles start downhill at what you hoped would give 300ft/mile, observer on the 'Rumble' seat and plotter calling 'Dots 1, Steady, Dashes 1, Steady' you hoped, plus ranges - effectively an in-house ACR7. The required landing rate for the stream was one every 3 minutes, and since take-offs had been at 1 min or even occasionally 30 sec apart, with 3 x 16 U/E squadrons on exercises there was sometimes a lot of time to lose in the 'Trombone' on return. Primitive though the system was, it did work.
binbrook is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2015, 18:23
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Kalgoorlie, W.A. , Australia
Age: 86
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a tube watchers point of view, you homed in on the reciprocal bearing of the active runway using Eureka to be overhead at 1500ft. When overhead you switched to the babs freqency'. (Did the tower then give you a heading?) You then called turn 60 degrees right maintain 1500ft calling ranges at 2 mile intervals, at 8 miles the call was "8 miles turn left left". The pilot commenced a level rate 1 left turn and you called the range at 1 mile intervals. This turn should put you on the runway centre line at 5 miles.

Now Babs was what was in the little Standard van and you are interpretating its signals on a Rebbeca set (aurally for solo pilots) visually from a small crt. As the rebbeca was for both eureka and babs, the crt had scales of 12 miles, 60 and 120. We were taught to call either right or left left (and steady?). (I think slightly crept in if we did not want a large correction).

At 5 miles began the continuous patter to balance the two arms displayed on the crt with distance calls and mandatory calls with height checks on the level miles. After calling "1 mile 300 ft" we were supposed to shut up!
Pom Pax is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.