B-24J Witchcraft Bombay
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B-24J Witchcraft Bomb bay
I have a "Ghosts" calendar (the best!) and the May picture shows a currently flying B-24J "Witchcraft"
-also seen here
B24J Witchcraft | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Is the open framework seen below the aircraft the bomb doors? I have looked at a lot of photos of B-24's dropping bombs in WW2 but can't see anything like that
-also seen here
B24J Witchcraft | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Is the open framework seen below the aircraft the bomb doors? I have looked at a lot of photos of B-24's dropping bombs in WW2 but can't see anything like that
Last edited by Heathrow Harry; 1st Jun 2012 at 10:29.
Have a look at the third photo in this thread: GoPro shots (B-24 and P-51 content) - Key Publishing Ltd Aviation Forums
This was taken from the B-24J mentioned above during 'Bombing camp' and shows a concrete replica bomb being dropped on a range. The keel beam providing structural strength to the fuselage in this area is also used as a walkway through the bombbay. The Flight Engineer was sitting in the cockpit area during this drop but with his foot on the walkway, seen in the photo.
This was taken from the B-24J mentioned above during 'Bombing camp' and shows a concrete replica bomb being dropped on a range. The keel beam providing structural strength to the fuselage in this area is also used as a walkway through the bombbay. The Flight Engineer was sitting in the cockpit area during this drop but with his foot on the walkway, seen in the photo.
I think asome of the confusion comes from the fact that the B-24 didn't have conventional bob bay "doors:. It had roller shutters that slid up on tracks on outside of the fuselage skin. So no doors hanging down as we see on most bombers. These just went up on the sides like the ones some stores use to close off their display windows at night.
I believe that was one reason that the B-24 had a reputation as being a poor ditching machine. The roller shutter type doors had not much strength and on ditching, the water would push them right in and immediately flooding the aircraft.
I believe that was one reason that the B-24 had a reputation as being a poor ditching machine. The roller shutter type doors had not much strength and on ditching, the water would push them right in and immediately flooding the aircraft.
B-24 bomb bay doors.
https://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=....0.aPqkFfgwzNE
And a test ditching here:
After the ditching: File:1944 B-24 James River Ditching Damage.jpg - NasaCRgis
https://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=....0.aPqkFfgwzNE
And a test ditching here:
After the ditching: File:1944 B-24 James River Ditching Damage.jpg - NasaCRgis
Last edited by Load Toad; 3rd Jun 2012 at 08:56.
Interesting footage Load Toad, but it appears that this particular B-24 had a solid fuselage underbelly without bomb doors, so it is not really representative of a basic B-24 airframe. It does nicely show what happens to an airplane when ditched though. Also the nose breaking off just in front of the wing is a known B-24 weakness.
