Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Buying A Stampe SV-4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2011, 02:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buying A Stampe SV-4

Any ideas as what to watch out for if buying a Stampe SV-4.
I understand there is an issue re Tie rods.
Anything that will help me avoid unforseen pitfalls. I am getting an engineer familiar with Chipmunks and Tiger Moth to look at it, but he hasn't dealt with Stampe before. The knowledge base amoungst engineers is limited.
Any information from the knowledgeable folk who have bought/owned would be appreciated.
John
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2011, 10:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,674
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Try `www.tigerclub.co.uk`,as they`ve operated them for hundreds of years.tel(0)1622 891 017. Seem to recall oil soaked fuselage and fin-post probs. Their engineers should be able to give you a rundown of SBs and ADs.
Another one is the LAA as they look after Permit a/c.
Nice a/c to fly,better than a Tiger for aeros,but keep them `gentlemanly`.
sycamore is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2011, 10:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: taking up the hold
Age: 53
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having owned an SV4C many years ago I would avoid the Renault engined ones. I know some.people operate the Renault with very few problems but they are certainly more.troublesome than the gypsies.

Tie rods were lifed at 500 hours so not changed all that frequently.

The best person to advise you is Andy McLuskie at Little Gransden. He has done a.number of rebuilds over the years.

PilotWeb
Tail-take-off is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2011, 10:48
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TTO
There are 2 available that I am looking at.
One is Renault powered. The other is a Lycoming conversion.
I was initially tempted by the lycoming but the Renault aircraft looks nicer.
How bad is the Renault to operate?
John

Last edited by rjtjrt; 3rd Apr 2011 at 13:09.
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2011, 18:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: taking up the hold
Age: 53
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Renault is not a common engine in the uk. Spares & expertise are hard to find & they're not getting any younger!

read this http://www.pprune.org/private-flying...vs-stampe.html

Last edited by Tail-take-off; 3rd Apr 2011 at 18:33.
Tail-take-off is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2011, 21:10
  #6 (permalink)  
Cool Mod
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: 18nm N of LGW
Posts: 6,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have some 450 hours in the Tiger (usually ACDC) and about 150 in the Stampe,(Hi!) including EF, and the man with the name knows what he is talking about. However, I believe the Renault engined Stampe was a Belgian variant. We had one at Biggin Hill for a time and I liked it. However, 'Stampe' the Tiger was a bitch to some guys but that was always usually because it had to FLOWN. The Stampe is a lot more forgiving. I was a check pilot at the TC for about 8 years and the transition from the Tiger to the Stampe was by and large a very simple one - but not the other way round.

Aeros in the Stampe were a delight. In the Tiger they were hard work but both had good spin qualities but when rolling - the Tiger was not so good.

As for maintenance I recall one of the Stampe's had an oil soaked main spar that was quite worrying but I have no idea what was done, and I can't remember whether it was TKC or WEF. But they did get very oily. As for engines the Gypsy was the best for me and when I was displaying I used OBX, which had a 10c. That changed everything.
PPRuNe Pop is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 07:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPP
I believe the Renault engined Stampe was a Belgian variant
Spoken like a true patriotic Brit.

The (Belgian) manufacturer used a Renault engine in the first model, the SV.4A.
They changed to the Gipsy Major I for the SV.4B. (Post-war, they used the Gipsy Major X for the trainers they supplied to the Belgian Air Force.)
The SV.4C was licence-built in France and Algeria and had a Renault engine. The two companies produced about 1000 aircraft.

Agree with you about the Tiger - relatively easy to fly, but difficult to fly well. I never got to that stage. After being checked out in ACDC I moved to the Stampe fairly quickly and hardly ever flew the Tiger again. Your mention of AWEF brings back happy memories - a joy to fly.

Tudor
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 07:55
  #8 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,224
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
I think that you might get more and more-informed answers on the Private Flying forum.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 11:24
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the info so far. I contacted Andy McCluskie as well as some locals.
Hoping more info still to come.
I will try Private Flying are as well - will post on the old thread to possibly reactivate it.
John
PS I just saw old thread on Private Flying is closed so will start a new one.

Last edited by rjtjrt; 7th Apr 2011 at 11:27. Reason: New Info
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 16:07
  #10 (permalink)  
Cool Mod
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: 18nm N of LGW
Posts: 6,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rjtjrt,

No need for another thread. We generally do not allow two threads on the same subject running. But I will copy this to Priavte Flying.

PPP
PPRuNe Pop is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.