Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

One of our airfields is missing!

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

One of our airfields is missing!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2011, 17:58
  #21 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,637
Received 300 Likes on 168 Posts
Ah, fair enough, Googling the village name also reveals a fair bit!
treadigraph is online now  
Old 17th Jan 2011, 09:32
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: EGBJ -> ESSB
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevron
Why be so secretive? The identity is in the public domain on aeronautical charts and in the AIP under Restricted Area R104.
Common knowledge doesn't mean that OS won't follow government guidelines on not revealing the true nature of a facility. That said, I'm sure OS just has a simple classification system for certain areas so "works" would cover any large industrial type complex.

That said, back in the day a lot of these generalisations just came down to photographic interpretation of aerial photos. If it looked like an industrial site, it was marked as works, even if it was something else.
HighTow is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2011, 09:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Over Will's mother's, and climbing
Age: 67
Posts: 379
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The one thats imaginitivly signed as a Works Unit
Do you mean this one?
XV490 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2011, 13:18
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
I was referring to the site 'nearby to AWRE' not to Welford.
chevvron is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2011, 19:47
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
Age: 45
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair point HighTow. Marking a "Works" or "Depot" more specifically would be difficult even if you weren't going to print "Secret Nuclear Research Facility".

I was in northern Pakistan many years ago, in the bit that's likely to get you bombed by a Predator drone now. Apparently most of the maps were based on aerial photos taken after the war when it was still British India, once the maps were made they had to send someone around the remote bits to ask the names of all the villages and prominent landmarks.

You can picture bored soldiers waiting desperately for demob trudging the lonely passes armed only with a rough copy of the map, a basic grasp of the language and a War Department pencil (signed for in triplicate).

Having returned from their travels the maps were printed and sent for proof reading. It was only then noticed that quite a few of the villages were called "Don't ask me I'm new here" or "P*** off I'm busy" etc.

Sadly as far as I know no comedy names still appear on the maps, although I suspect there are other examples even in the font of all modern cartographic knowledge that is Google Earth.
Bored987 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2011, 15:03
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: England
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Story from Italy: in mid 70s aerial photas became available from NASA. In Italy the agents for NASA are the Italian Air Force. Italian friend of mine ordered aerial photo of Rome (where he lived). Eventually photo arrived.
However, in Italy it's against the law (old Mussolini law like so many current Italian laws) to depict military installations on photos or maps.
Caught in Catch 22, Italian Air Force had Snopaked 22 spots on the photo, pinpointing exactly the location of all military installations in Rome.
There's something endearing about Italian bureaucracy....
Four Wings is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2011, 17:58
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
Age: 45
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course the main reason there are so many laws from Mussolini's time is that with the exception of Burlosconi all Italian parliaments last about a week before breaking up in acrimony. And Berlosconi hasn't got round to changing anything because he's been busy doing other things.

(Currently the other thing is 17 and called Ruby if the La Republica are to be believed)
Bored987 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.