Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

Spitfire style control column vs straight column

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Spitfire style control column vs straight column

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jan 2010, 18:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA (Naturalized but bits still British!)
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spitfire style control column vs straight column

I've searched the archives to no avail so if this question is a duplicate, sorry.

Here goes:

Can anyone give me valid reasons, be they ergonomic or otherwise, why British WW2 era fighters used a control column with a ring at the top as opposed to the straightforward style used elsewhere. I am an engineer, not a pilot so be gentle

Knowing that necessity is the mother etc, I have to believe it was not just down to "this is what we had before, therfore this is what you get..."

Thanks in advance
PT6ER is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2010, 20:04
  #2 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
They didn't know how to build a nice roomy cockpit like the Yanks
Think stick throw.
tinpis is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2010, 20:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
In the days of manual controls a pilot could use both hands on a spade grip as opposed to a straight stick and therefore get more aileron quicker and therefore a faster rate of roll. There was nothing delicate about dog-fighting, it was throttles to the wall and violent manhandling of all the controls. Some pilots were so ham-fisted that they spun out of trouble. Other spun into it.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2010, 17:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Station 42
Age: 69
Posts: 1,081
Received 93 Likes on 39 Posts
I read somewhere that it was designed to eliminate the amount of lateral movement necessary with a conventional stick to obtain full aileron deflection.
(Like tinpis sez.)

Last edited by stevef; 12th Jan 2010 at 18:09.
stevef is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2010, 19:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FWIW the Percival Prentice had a similar stick top IIRC. Make of it what you may, but dog-fighting was probably not top of the designer's priorities. Futile attempts at spin recovery, maybe. Heaving the damn thing off the ground, maybe.
Capot is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2010, 20:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,077
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You could hang onto that style of stick during negative G.
ZeBedie is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2010, 20:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: due south
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You **@#!**#@ Capot:

It has taken me years to erase the memory of that apology for a flying machine, and now you had to name the bloody thing and bring the nightmare back to life again, thanks a bunch !
henry crun is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2010, 20:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 631
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
These are all very sensible reasons for having a spade grip in a fighter. So answer me this, why did the Hotspur glider have one?
VX275 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 00:39
  #9 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
No room unless you were Douglas Bader




BBC - WW2 People's War - WAR EXPERIENCES OF A GLIDER PILOT Part 1



WAR EXPERIENCES OF A GLIDER PILOT — Part 1

Training

My name is Ron Willcox and I am now 83 years old.
I was a glider pilot during the war. The training glider was called a Hotspur.
There wasn’t a lot of room to sit and if you were a big man it was quite difficult to get in, and you would have to sit with your knees bent all the time. It’s rather like a ‘go kart’. We had a speed indicator which was the main instrument that you needed, and we also had an altimeter.
tinpis is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 07:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This chap is building a replica Sopwith Snipe,

Sopwith Snipe Project

His control grip is shown on page 20. Guess what shape it is...

Cheers!
Vitesse is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 08:56
  #11 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
These are all very sensible reasons for having a spade grip in a fighter. So answer me this, why did the Hotspur glider have one?
A bunch of spare Spitfire grips?
Human Factor is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 09:03
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Henry Crun

Here's some aversion therapy;



Now back to the thread....................................
Capot is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 10:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The RCAF Harvards (1953) had a spade in the front cockpit and a stick in the rear cockpit. You can't be fairer than that.
Krakatoa is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 18:54
  #14 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not sure why some posters have expressed the view that the spade top in a small cockpit gave better lateral stick throws without hitting ones thighs.

I think they may have been confusing the Spitfire's cranked stick which certainly is easier to keep away from your thighs than a straight stick.

John Farley is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 22:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: EGBJ -> ESSB
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xv275
These are all very sensible reasons for having a spade grip in a fighter. So answer me this, why did the Hotspur glider have one?
Ergonomics amongst other things. Early MkI/II's had a straight vertical stick and rudder bars fitted and had no adjustment spare a somewhat moveable seat back. However on more than one occasion the seat back collapsed during approach causing some hairy and sometimes fatal landings. Modifications added rudder pedals on slides which could be adjusted for leg length and the vertical stick was replaced with a curved model with the spade grip on the end which curved back toward the pilot. This reduced the need to hold your arm out so straight to fly which relieved some strain on long cross-country flights. The result of the stick being nearer the pilot necessitated the spade grip so that it could be held at a more relaxed angle and not require you to bend the wrist the wrist so much. A side effect of the curved spade grip stick mod was that it solved problems with the straight stick getting jammed. When performing a "sporty" dive approach pushing the stick all the way forward pushed it behind the edge of the instrument panel. If it was moved to the side at all the top of the stick would get stuck behind the panel and you couldn't pull it back. Negative "G" plus a somewhat panicked pilot let to a few accidents. With the curved stick having the top further back it never reached the panel when pushed fully forward.
HighTow is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 08:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 631
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks for that High Tow, it certainly fits in with the information I have and it confirms that the one drawing I have shows the correct control layout for the Mk 1, indeed the penciled aditions might even be the first sketch of the cranked Spade grip.
VX275 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.