Comet original engines
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: uk
Age: 70
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Comet original engines
I am after some more info for my book. I would like to know what the original engines were on the Comet? They were a bit underpowered which led to the skin of the aircraft being reduced to save weight. What were the American engines called that should have been used?
Would much appreciate reply.
Chris
Would much appreciate reply.
Chris
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Er, no plan to fit it with US engines existed.
The engines fitted to the Mark 1 Comet were De Havilland Ghosts. The preferred engine, fitted to Mark 2 and later, was the Rolls-Royce Avon.
The engines fitted to the Mark 1 Comet were De Havilland Ghosts. The preferred engine, fitted to Mark 2 and later, was the Rolls-Royce Avon.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 71
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tevios,
I'm not sure where your source of information is coming from, but the Comet skin certainly wasn't reduced to save any weight. An increase in overall weight occured because of the neccessity to 'armour plate' the engine bay walls. This was done to protect the wing/fuselage structure from the possibilty of any turbine shedding from the the engine(s); which would cause catastrophic failure of the surrounding structure.
As DozyWannabe quite rightly states... there was never any plan to introduce an american engine. The Ghost 50 Mk1 engine was severely underpowered. Originally, De Haviland had planned to fit two Sprite 'booster rockets' to improve take-off performance at hot and high airfields such as Nairobi; however, after some thirty test firings, it was concluded that they weren't neccessary. The later AJ65 Avon engines produced much higher levels of thrust from a less heavier engine.
TCF
I'm not sure where your source of information is coming from, but the Comet skin certainly wasn't reduced to save any weight. An increase in overall weight occured because of the neccessity to 'armour plate' the engine bay walls. This was done to protect the wing/fuselage structure from the possibilty of any turbine shedding from the the engine(s); which would cause catastrophic failure of the surrounding structure.
As DozyWannabe quite rightly states... there was never any plan to introduce an american engine. The Ghost 50 Mk1 engine was severely underpowered. Originally, De Haviland had planned to fit two Sprite 'booster rockets' to improve take-off performance at hot and high airfields such as Nairobi; however, after some thirty test firings, it was concluded that they weren't neccessary. The later AJ65 Avon engines produced much higher levels of thrust from a less heavier engine.
TCF
Gamekeeper
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: South East
Age: 61
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tevios - you're not getting confused with another fine "British Aeroplane" are you - the 1-11? Now there were plans to fit US engines to that - the mighty JT8D - shame it didn't come off as that would have given the "yanks" a run for their money
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: uk
Age: 70
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have looked up the info on google as suggested. Why I didn't do this in the first place... Anyway, square navigation windows were to blame for catastrophic metal fatigue leading to the loss of aircraft. The American CAA, interestingly already had misgivings about the square windows and would not issue an airworthyness certificate. The book I'm writing is only an Autobiography, but if you refer to anything you have to make sure of your material.
Nontheless, thanks for your help.
Nontheless, thanks for your help.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,095
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
given the "yanks" a run for their money
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nirvana South
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tevios,
I think you'll find it wasn't "navigation windows" but the square cut-outs for the ADF loop antennas that was identified as the initial point of the failure of the fuselage.
Parabellum,
I beleive the largest initial fleet was American with 30, Mohawk had 18. The best site on the 1-11 is here Ironically the last attempt to improve the 1-11 was by an American company, Dee Howard, that successfully installed Rolls Royce Tays but couldn't complete the certification as BAe wouldn't (or couldn't) release the original data.
I think you'll find it wasn't "navigation windows" but the square cut-outs for the ADF loop antennas that was identified as the initial point of the failure of the fuselage.
Parabellum,
I beleive the largest initial fleet was American with 30, Mohawk had 18. The best site on the 1-11 is here Ironically the last attempt to improve the 1-11 was by an American company, Dee Howard, that successfully installed Rolls Royce Tays but couldn't complete the certification as BAe wouldn't (or couldn't) release the original data.
Gamekeeper
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: South East
Age: 61
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're right ICT_SLB re the 1-11 and the Tay, sad as that may be (BAe were concerned for potential sales impact on the BAe146, especially if the Romanians could produce the airframe cheap, and it's fair to say Airbus wouldn't have encouraged BAe either with the A320 coming on stream). But for sure if the a/c had been offered at its inception with the US engine, sales would have no doubt been even greater in the States. It says a lot for the a/c that it sold in the numbers it did with just the Spey.
Tevios - if you want a good history of the Comet ("other good Comet books are available") go see a copy of Timothy Walkers book "The First Jet Airliner: The Story of the De Havilland Comet" (ISBN 1-902236-05-X), Scoval Publishing Ltd. Hope that helps...
PFR
Tevios - if you want a good history of the Comet ("other good Comet books are available") go see a copy of Timothy Walkers book "The First Jet Airliner: The Story of the De Havilland Comet" (ISBN 1-902236-05-X), Scoval Publishing Ltd. Hope that helps...
PFR
Last edited by PFR; 10th Jan 2010 at 15:05. Reason: ...grammar!
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ICT_SLB.
Correct.
Tevios, I think you'll find it wasn't "navigation windows" but the square cut-outs for the ADF loop antennas that was identified as the initial point of the failure of the fuselage.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boroughbridge North Yorks
Age: 88
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
comet engines
In 1956 fresh out of the airforce, I started with Marshalls and was placed on the three Ex BOAC Comet2 conversions for the RAF
I was involved in fitting of the Titanium firewalls between the enginebays and also the hardware prior to the Avons being fitted.What a job as anyone will testify when drilling Titanium ,I still have the scars.
Another large Mod I was involved in was the fitting of the "Droop snout" profile leading edges (hundreds of anchor nuts to fit ) and new engine air intakes. If my memory serves me right these were to help with low speed problems, and a cure for the Comets having too smooth airflow around the intakes resulting at certain angles of attack, a blanket effect to the inboard engine airflow.
A look at the earlier Comets compared to later ones and you will see what I mean,a protuding top leading edge to the intakes.
Later, working on the Comet 4 assembly line at Hatfield, I seem to remember going over to the other side of the airfield to see an old mate of mine ,"Olly Wood" and he showed me round a Ghost powered Comet of the MOD. Having worked on Ghost engines in the RAF it was very interesting to compare
Merv
I was involved in fitting of the Titanium firewalls between the enginebays and also the hardware prior to the Avons being fitted.What a job as anyone will testify when drilling Titanium ,I still have the scars.
Another large Mod I was involved in was the fitting of the "Droop snout" profile leading edges (hundreds of anchor nuts to fit ) and new engine air intakes. If my memory serves me right these were to help with low speed problems, and a cure for the Comets having too smooth airflow around the intakes resulting at certain angles of attack, a blanket effect to the inboard engine airflow.
A look at the earlier Comets compared to later ones and you will see what I mean,a protuding top leading edge to the intakes.
Later, working on the Comet 4 assembly line at Hatfield, I seem to remember going over to the other side of the airfield to see an old mate of mine ,"Olly Wood" and he showed me round a Ghost powered Comet of the MOD. Having worked on Ghost engines in the RAF it was very interesting to compare
Merv
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Age: 79
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Comet skin-thinning
The claim that the Comet's skin was made thinner to compensate for the low thrust of the Ghost is made in the Wikipedia article on the DH Ghost.
This is certainly the first time I've heard such a claim, but that doesn't prove much. Any truth? Or is it a misunderstanding of the design constraints on early jets.
I remember going to Hatfield on a jolly from school, and seeing Comets being glued together.
This is certainly the first time I've heard such a claim, but that doesn't prove much. Any truth? Or is it a misunderstanding of the design constraints on early jets.
I remember going to Hatfield on a jolly from school, and seeing Comets being glued together.
This is not necessarily so. The Caravelle was launched with Avon engines (turbojets no less), and was a major sales success. They then offered the JT8D, a fan jet, as a major development. Sales were poor for this variant, none to the Americans at all (the one US fleet of Caravelles, with United, chose Avons), and Sud probably didn't even get their money back from the JT8D project.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A late mark Caravelle was test flown with GE CJ805-23 aftfans (same as the CV990) - but no sales resulted. After the program was cancelled, the ship was restored to standard configuration and sold.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The claim that the Comet's skin was made thinner to compensate for the low thrust of the Ghost is made in the Wikipedia article on the DH Ghost
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boroughbridge North Yorks
Age: 88
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another weight saving on the Comets was the Redux process , to attach stringers to the skin. This was a common process used by D Hs on most of their aircraft at that time,Doves and Herons etc. Think of the glue looking like rasberry jam between two pieces of metal, then heated, and then think of all the weight of rivits not required,some weight saving! .
Merv
Merv