World War One and the 'Scout Fighter'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
World War One and the 'Scout Fighter'
I was in a fairly spotterish discussion yesterday about World War One fighters, or 'scouts' and just which one was the best one Britain could offer, and how well i stacked up against the opposition - so gentlemen, I put it to you.
My view is that figures don't lie, and if the Sopwith Camel shot down the most, then surely it must have been the best, non? Yes it was tricky to fly, but the fact is that it was those same handling characteristics that made it so manoeuvrable, and therefore so successful. It was also better armed with twin belt fed guns, rather than that the SE.5a, which is the plane my companion was banging on about - something about climb rate, and speed to be honest I just ignored him as obviously wrong
So, what's the view?
My view is that figures don't lie, and if the Sopwith Camel shot down the most, then surely it must have been the best, non? Yes it was tricky to fly, but the fact is that it was those same handling characteristics that made it so manoeuvrable, and therefore so successful. It was also better armed with twin belt fed guns, rather than that the SE.5a, which is the plane my companion was banging on about - something about climb rate, and speed to be honest I just ignored him as obviously wrong
So, what's the view?
Bristol M1C - ahead of its time but not popular with their airships.
Sopwith Dolphin and Sopwith Snipe were superior to the Camel but didn't have the time in active service to better the Camel's score.
I don't hink the SE5/5a killed as many of its own pilots as the Camel.
Sopwith Dolphin and Sopwith Snipe were superior to the Camel but didn't have the time in active service to better the Camel's score.
I don't hink the SE5/5a killed as many of its own pilots as the Camel.
Originally Posted by Yeoman_dai
My view is that figures don't lie, and if the Sopwith Camel shot down the most, then surely it must have been the best, non? Yes it was tricky to fly, but the fact is that it was those same handling characteristics that made it so manoeuvrable, and therefore so successful. It was also better armed with twin belt fed guns, rather than that the SE.5a, which is the plane my companion was banging on about - something about climb rate, and speed to be honest I just ignored him as obviously wrong
Camel may have more in total, but, if you look at the list of the highest scoring British/Commonwealth aces, such as Ball, McCudden, Bishop and Mannock, they all flew, and preferred the SE.5a....
The Camel was at it’s best at low and medium altitudes and coupled with the forward firing twin belt fed Vickers MG’s, it was a formidable weapons platform once mastered by a pilot. For these reasons Camel’s were also employed in the ground attack/strafing role which they were ideally suited for.
However, the SE.5a's speed and climb rate and easier handling meant that once above 10,000ft the SE.5a was superior to the Camel, and it’s armament was better suited to high altitude air fighting, as was it’s better pilot visibility and better handling characteristics.
One wasn’t better than the other, they complimented each other.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeoman dai
Whilst the Sopwith Camel served in greater numbers than some other aircraft its engine was either a 110 hp Le Rhone or a 130 hp Clerget rotary engine. The SE5A was powered by a 200 hp, 220 hp or 240 hp Hispano Suiza or a 200 hp Wolseley Viper engine. The Camel had a maximum speed of 118 mph whereas the SE5A had a maximum speed of 132 mph.
In addition, the exhaust fumes from the lubrication system of the Camel's rotary engine had such a deleterious effect on the physical processes of its Pilots that patrols were curtailed to enable the pilots to seek suitable toilet facilities.
Whilst the Sopwith Camel served in greater numbers than some other aircraft its engine was either a 110 hp Le Rhone or a 130 hp Clerget rotary engine. The SE5A was powered by a 200 hp, 220 hp or 240 hp Hispano Suiza or a 200 hp Wolseley Viper engine. The Camel had a maximum speed of 118 mph whereas the SE5A had a maximum speed of 132 mph.
In addition, the exhaust fumes from the lubrication system of the Camel's rotary engine had such a deleterious effect on the physical processes of its Pilots that patrols were curtailed to enable the pilots to seek suitable toilet facilities.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: EU Land
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another vote for the SE5a. The SE5a soldiered on into the 1920's, while the Camel, for all its combat stats, was already being replaced by the Snipe before war's end (although there were only 4 Snipe sqns operational at the time of the Armistice).
Happy New Year,
S.O.
Happy New Year,
S.O.
