Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

UK Cold War targets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2009, 15:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North of Watford (Gap)
Age: 58
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UK Cold War targets

From reading recent posts in the Vulcan thread, I thought a separate thread might be preferable to thread creep on that one.

Having studied the UK 'who would have got what' map at Bruntingthorpe, I was surprised to see that my neck of the woods appears to have been designated/destined to receive two buckets from the Soviets. My question is - why two?

I guess the easy first reason is that Nottingham was a population centre of worth enough to warrant one over the city centre.

But why a second one within five miles or so - slightly to the west (as it appears on the map)? The old RSG bunker is a little west of centre, but not by much, so a good yield over the city centre would surely have taken this out too. I wonder if the old 12Grp underground command station at RAF Watnall (right on my doorstep) was the more likely target? I suppose RR Hucknall would have been a possibility too, although that is a bit more north than west.

Any thoughts?
nacluv is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 19:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well, Lincolnshire
Age: 69
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, Nottingham.

The second one was a 'just in case' the first one didn't work!!



Sorry, couldn't resist.
taxydual is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 01:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
taxydual,

You are closer to the truth than you realise.

A nukes accuracy is measured by its CEP or Circular Error Probable. That is, the radius from the target within which 50% of the nukes launched at it, will fall.

Another variation of the "double-tap".
PLovett is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 04:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Can anyone advise if Stoke would have got some sunshine? It really does need it but maybe the Soviets just thought it'd be easier to let us just carry on as before.
Load Toad is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 06:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Had they heeded John Betjeman's invitaion regarding Slough?
Wander00 is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 08:43
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North of Watford (Gap)
Age: 58
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good one, Taxydual! I often wonder similar thoughts myself when wandering round the city... Sort of 'chavnic' cleansing? There are a lot of webbed feet around here.

I can't remember what yields were posted against both targets, although I can say that they were definitely different, so the separation of the targets and different yields seem to suggest that a backup approach may not be on the right track after all. If I remember correctly, the larger yield was not for the city centre.

And this is the crux of the issue - what was more important than taking the city itself out? Or what was a harder nut to crack?

The other thing to bear in mind is that the map was not dated, so I don't know if this has any bearing on this particular conundrum. The 12Grp underground bunker at RAF Watnall closed in 1961. The RSG closed somewhat later than that.

Sorry I can't help with Stoke.
nacluv is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.