Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

RR Griffon at low RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jun 2009, 21:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: EGOS Field 24
Posts: 1,118
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
RR Griffon at low RPM

Firstly, apologies if this isn't the best forum to ask the question. I mentioned on another thread that the BBMF's Spitfire PR XIX landed at Cosford yesterday on a weather diversion and made a lot of people very happy in the process. After the aircraft had taxyed past us and departed with the usual glorious audio accompaniment, several of us were subsequently wondering why the Griffon sounds almost as though it's only running on one bank of cylinders when running at low RPM. In fact at one stage it sounded for all the world like a rotary engine being 'blipped'.

I don't recall Shackletons sounding like that but another spectator observed that the Sea Fury's Centaurus sounds very similar ("like a bag of bolts" was the expression used) at low power. Is this a general characteristic of big piston engines, and if so why?
ACW599 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 06:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no inherent reason that a large multi-cylinder piston engine, even of high performance, should sound like that at idle.

I'd guess that on the Griffon the primitive (by modern standards) fuel injectors are optimised for high power settings, and at low power settings their metering is poor, resulting in random misfires and backfires.

Last edited by CirrusF; 29th Jun 2009 at 12:03.
CirrusF is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 09:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
another spectator observed that the Sea Fury's Centaurus sounds very similar ("like a bag of bolts" was the expression used)
I remember the Aer Turas C54 that used to be a regular visitor to Cambridge when I was there at flying school. That description sums up well the sound of that machine taxying. A total contrast to take-off and the music of 4 Twin Wasps in close formation.

Regarding the wonderful Griffon, though, my money is on CirrusF‘s suggestion.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 09:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
There is another thread
P51
that covers this. Something to do with a different firing order.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 13:13
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: EGOS Field 24
Posts: 1,118
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
>I'd guess that on the Griffon the primitive (by modern standards) fuel injectors are optimised for high power settings<

I'd guess that the Griffon in the PR XIX has a Stromberg injection carburettor rather than "injectors". But sub-optimal mixture distribution at other than full power is probably the answer.
ACW599 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 15:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North of Watford (Gap)
Age: 58
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At Waddo Airshow last year, the BBMF PRXIX did a beautiful formation display with one of CBY's Typhoons. Afterwards, coming in on the downwind leg on it's own, it sounded decidedly sick - popping and banging like mad, really rough.

At the time I put it down to having had to work bloody hard to keep up!

But I prefer CF's explanation.
nacluv is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 18:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,802
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
I seem to remember reading somewhere that the Griffon in a PR.XIX is an ex-Shackleton unit. As such it has a pretty high idle rpm which needed to be decreased to enable the Spitfire to taxi at a normal speed. Because of this the idle rpm of this Griffon is a compromise between keeping the engine running and keeping the revs low enough to enable a normal taxiing pace. At this specific rpm setting the engine isn't smooth.
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 19:07
  #8 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,695
Received 342 Likes on 188 Posts
Jhieminga, you may be thinking of the French Spitfire XIX which was rebuilt by Steve Hinton with a Shackleton Griffon 56 and contra prop unit as they were easier to come by than the normal Griffon 65, and also removed the torque problem which would have enabled Hinton to go after some brakes off to height records - had somebody else not got there first in a homebuilt!

Jacquard, the current owner, has now converted it back to a Griffon 65 this year and while it's a shame that an intriguing shape and sound has gone, the aeroplane is back as she should be.

Now... if the American owner of the airworthy Seafire 47 could be persuaded to bring it over here for a few weeks next year...

I love the sound Griffon makes - it does sound quite rough while throttled back, but at full snort that ripping snarl sounds fantastic! In the BoB film, you can distinctly hear the difference between one of the Merlin powered Spits and a Griffon during one of the scramble sequences.
treadigraph is online now  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 21:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,802
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
I wasn't actually, I looked it up, it was in Aircraft Illustrated from November 1999. The article is about the RR PR.XIX PS853:
...and a Griffon RG30 SM-S has been fitted in place of the original Griffon 65. The Griffon RG30 SM-S was modified from a Shackleton Griffon by changing the external gearbox, reshaping the supercharger and camshaft cover and deletion of the Shackleton engine's FS gear.
The engine in the Shackleton was required to run at an idle of around 1200 rpm; the preferred speed for the Spitfire is around 350 rpm. The idle speed on this installation has been reduced to a compromise figure of 500 rpm.
It could well be a Griffon 65 in the BBMF PR.XIX but the comment on the idle speeds for the Spitfire vs. the Shackleton may explain the different characteristics.
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 22:05
  #10 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,695
Received 342 Likes on 188 Posts
As ever one lives and learns... looking at the BBMF website PM631 has a Griffon 66 (well it says it was built with one but doesn't say what it has now) and PS915 has a modified Griffon 58.

Jacquard has definitely changed the engine, but I wonder if he's actually fitted a suitably modified 58 from a Shackleton?

No matter, they still sound great! But a sad reflection that I can't now remember what a Shackleton sounds like taxiing - the last few I saw arrived, displayed and flew off again.
treadigraph is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.