Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

BAA withdraws Air Atlantique DC-6 landing slot at LHR

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

BAA withdraws Air Atlantique DC-6 landing slot at LHR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Nov 2008, 14:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Age: 81
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BAA withdraws Air Atlantique DC-6 landing slot at LHR

The BAA has withdrawn its landing slot permission for this coming Friday November 7th for Air Atlantique's DC-6 G-APSA - particularly sad considering the commemoration of the last British Eagle flight in 1968.

One really does wonder at what motivates the BAA decision-making prats ...

The AA official statement reads as follows and is remarkably conciliatory in the circumstances :-

HEATHROW REFUSES ENTRY

With great regret we must announce that we are no longer able to visit Heathrow this Friday, 7 November. We realise that this will be a bitter disappointment to many people.

Operation into London Heathrow, in common with many large airports, requires the allocation of a slot for each movement. Slots for our intended operation were allocated to us last week, at which point we confirmed with our supporters that we would be making the journey. Yesterday, however, we were advised by a representative of BAA, the airport operator, that these slots were to be withdrawn because they were concerned that the operation of the DC6 at Heathrow was potentially disruptive to normal operations. In the course of several commercial charters into Heathrow in recent years, and two previous commemorative flights (including one for BAA), our experience has been that the DC6 does not cause any inconvenience. Moreover, we were able to demonstrate to the relevant ATC unit that the normal approach speeds and operating procedures of this Public Transport certified airliner were in line with current standards and would require no special treatment. We have had the great pleasure over recent years to visit each of the other capital airports in Europe. Regrettably, this busy international airport felt unable, at the eleventh hour, to agree to our visit.

Our flight this Friday was intended to commemorate the last commercial flight, exactly forty years ago, of a British Eagle aircraft on exactly the same route from Rotterdam to Heathrow. The captain of that original flight was to join us. We had hoped that this would be an uplifting event in these turbulent times, to remind people that flying can still be a fun and romantic endeavour. Unfortunately it appears that commercial priorities, or perhaps a misunderstanding of the nature of the DC6, has caused BAA to decide otherwise. We are tremendously grateful to our handling agent at Heathrow, Signature Flight Support, who generously agreed to sponsor our ground arrangements, and to members of the BAA team who arranged that our landing fees would be waived.

The aircraft will return directly from Rotterdam to Coventry within the next few days. We will publish the times accordingly. This will conclude public flying for this season as the aircraft enters scheduled maintenance on 23 November.

We look forward to an exciting new season in 2009 and to meeting more of you throughout next year.
Muaskid is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 14:36
  #2 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very sad. BAA. Need one say more? When will someone save us from that accursed organisation?
Rainboe is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 14:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now now, remember this is the same organisation that was responsible for the stunning launch of Terminal Five earlier this year. When it comes to disappointing the general public, it has no equal.
Bealzebub is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Perhaps we need to write to the board of Ferrovial, BAA's Spanish owners, and tell them just how constant BAA incompetence and stupidity drags Ferrovial's name through the mud.

Presumably BAA thought the DC6 crew wouldn't spend enough in the shops.
WHBM is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People who cancel such an historic flight for 'slots' can have no sense of 'aviation' - which must make it bloody difficult for them to run an airport. Disgraceful!
forget is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remember that these are the same people who, presumably at great expense, put up plastic sheeting around the perimeter fences to (try and) stop people watching the last Concorde flights land... pathetic
RomeoTangoFoxtrotMike is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Luton
Posts: 447
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It just goes to show how little these bureaucrats understand the historical relevence of these events.

I bet they did not consult ATC to see how little impact a DC6 would have on the operation.
Level bust is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those who have no respect for their history are destined to repeat the same mistakes made in the past.
soddim is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blighty (Nth. Downs)
Age: 77
Posts: 2,107
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
How disgusting, and how insensitive of the need to rehabilitate aviation in this country in general, and London in particular. Any other airport operator would have capitalised on the potential publicity of this event. The "Six" epitomises the romance and optimisation of long-haul piston airliners in the 1950s, and is as quiet as an Angel's fart.

How can such ignorant non-aviation-minded people expect to persuade the neighbours and the government to permit the extra runway we so desperately need in the South-East?
Chris Scott is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 314
Received 256 Likes on 51 Posts
This is Classic Flight not Air Atlantique?

Another great PR stunt gone wrong for BAA. However would there be anybody better out there to run the airports, when you have to balance, shareholders, the Campaign Against Aviation, meddling MPs and Civil Servants and the Nimbys.

Made all the more difficult by employing a bunch of clowns to run the group. BAA - should be renames BoA - Bunch of Arses
Spunky Monkey is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North Cornwall
Age: 73
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ferrovial must be just trying to remain afloat in the credit crunch climate. They borrowed £10bn to buy BAA and were struggling to repay that before the credit crunch.
Ferrovial delays £10bn BAA debt deal as profits halve - Times Online
That said I have just emailed Colin Matthews amd Mike Brown to make my views clear on BAAs decision.
srobarts is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:47
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: london
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn....

There goes BA's excuse for cancelling half their schedule on Friday


Eaglestar
EagleStar is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps we need to write to the board of Ferrovial, BAA's Spanish owners, and tell them just how constant BAA incompetence and stupidity drags Ferrovial's name through the mud.
I doubt it would help. In previous role, I met one of the current owners of the business, who was in complete and utter denial about the possibility that they might be forced to divest Gatwick - or any other airport for that matter.

The adage about a fool and his money seems particularly apt.
Re-Heat is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 16:02
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: THE PEANUT BAR
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pherhap the BAA need reminding of the disruption delays and additional fuel costs incured by airlines when recently they staged two practice days ahead of George Bushes visit...........chaos it was!!
KERDUNKER is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 16:08
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 257
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet another example of the incompetence we suffer in this country. The BAA is owned and run by a team of money-grabbing idiots, who have no care for 'service.' Look at the way passengers and crew alike are dealt with when passing through LHR. I give LHR a miss whenever possible.

Such a shame that a historic event like this has been scuppered by a load of fools, but then that's how the country in general is run.

gehenna is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 16:37
  #16 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
I suspect that, in common with 90% of modern companies, anything that is outside 'normal' and 'standard' is automatically presumed to cost more in time and money. Therefore, it should be rejected.

In the same mode, I recall an A-list Hollywood actor pointing out that the people who run the studios don't care if they are making movies or baked beans - as long as it makes money. So BAA are not alone.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 17:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What do you expect from the retail focused management at BAA? They genuinely have no idea about aviation, anything outside the shop confuses them.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 17:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is pointless to criticise BAA for their lack of any comprehension of the aviation industry and its priorities, of which the highest is the expeditious, safe movement of passengers from A to B.

They are shopping mall operators, no more and no less. As someone has suggested, a DC6 does not feed the malls with hundreds of gullible and, let's face it, very stupid victims buying useless tat at prices inflated way above the high street prices, "duty-free" goods on which there is no duty in the first place, and "duty-free" goods at prices which necessarily include the duty due on those goods.

The historical significance of the event would have meant no more to Heathrow's owners than the fate of the Spanish Armada.
Capot is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 17:41
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EGLL
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hopefully any journo's aware of this are already penning
scathing pieces about this lates BAA foot-shooting exercise.

Any newshounds out there picking up on this one?
G-ARZG is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 18:35
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,819
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Miserable faceless idiots.

I had the misfortune to travel through that abysmal shopping mall with aeroplanes last Sunday - never again!

Here are some contact details for anyone wishing to contact them:


General enquiry tel. no. for BAA LHR is 0870 000 0123.

More info at BAA Heathrow: Welcome to Heathrow Airport | Parking | Terminal 5 under 'Contact us'.....

(They can't even get their web links sorted.......)

Last edited by BEagle; 5th Nov 2008 at 18:46.
BEagle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.