Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Ba 038 incident at lhr

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jul 2011, 15:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Herts
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel Ba 038 incident at lhr

Very interesting investigation on Ch5 last night, details of the thorough search to determine the cause of the accident. Well presented and I thought Capt Burkill was very calm and precise in his statements. Apparently the cause of the accident was slush type ice that restricted the fuel flow to the engines with severe consequences. The AIB investigators were very thorough.
As it turns out ROLLS ROYCE had to modify a part on all the engines so that the problem will hopefully not happen again. Apparently a Delta flight enroute from China to Atlanta suffered the same symptoms on their 777 however problem resolved itself at a lower altitude presumably the slush ice in the lines went to liquid thus averting a possible tradgedy.
Glad to Capt Burkill is now back flying with BA a good pilot with a wealth of experience, he sure prevented a serious accident by raising the flaps from 30 to 25 giving the A/C more distance however the down side was a much greater sink rate. Well done.
KENNEDY TOWER is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 15:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: hong kong
Age: 49
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you just re-awakened from a coma?...............

Last edited by subsonicsubic; 29th Jul 2011 at 15:49. Reason: Mods pls. remove
subsonicsubic is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 16:03
  #3 (permalink)  
RotorHead
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,054
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Took the words out of my mouth Sleeper!
206Fan is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 16:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KENNEDY TOWER I think your abuse is misplaced despite the sarcastic responses your posting invoked.

I also saw it and thought along the lines of : "Oh no not another .....", so a date or some other reference to the fact that this is related to a past incident would have been welcome. It is after all always possible that there could have been another 777 incident at Heathrow, of course we all hope not.
Capetonian is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 16:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Age: 54
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rename the subject, this avoids these kind of shocks
Tediek is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 17:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is in Aviation History and Nostalgia!
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 17:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is in Aviation History and Nostalgia!
Well it is now!
Akrapovic is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 17:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah! ............
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 18:01
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the dark side of the moon
Posts: 976
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Funny, I've heard similarly misdirected vitriol from Kennedy Tower before. Usually it's aimed at a pilot who dared to set foot on JFK holy ground without having memorized the taxi chart in advance.
J.O. is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 18:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JFK, every single word in your post has been known to every professional pilot on this forum for ages. Neither your post nor "Ch5," whatever that is, has added an iota of information via this useless thread. That's why you got jumped on.
stepwilk is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 19:32
  #11 (permalink)  
Cool Mod
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: 18nm N of LGW
Posts: 6,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KT is now 'resting.' Carry on with the debate, but no more unecessary vitriol and childish comments please.

CH5 by the way, is channel on TV here. Should you consider the thread is still useless it is your prerogative to go or stay.
PPRuNe Pop is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2011, 01:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
semantics

I'm not sure why people persist in labeling this event, and many others both fatal and non, as "incidents". They meet all practical and legal definitions as "accidents" don't they?

(Except perhaps when safety-related SOPs are disregarded, in which case I call them "accidents looking for a place to happen...")
barit1 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2011, 23:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Accidents Investigation: Definitions


FL
Flying Lawyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.