Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Early jets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Sep 2007, 18:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London UK
Posts: 533
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Question Early jets

Just supposing Frank Whittle had been able to develop jet engines earlier and the RAF had been equipped with aircraft roughly equivalent to early Meteors and Vampires in 1940.

Would this have provided a significant advantage in the Battle of Britain? The only real advantage of very early jets seemed to be speed.
Dr Jekyll is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 20:16
  #2 (permalink)  
Spoon PPRuNerist & Mad Inistrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Twickenham, home of rugby
Posts: 7,418
Received 282 Likes on 180 Posts
Yes, it undoubtedly would.

The 8th USAAF were severely shaken by their encounters with the Me 262, and I have read published statements from senior USAAF figures indicating that had the 262 appeared in similar numbers a year earlier, the outcome of the daylight war over Germany would have been very different - basically the 8th would have been withdrawn.

So if the Meteor had been in service in 1940, then the Luftwaffe would have taken even more severe losses.

However, they would probably have adopted the night bombing tactics earlier, possibly negating their losses, although inflicting proportionately fewer RAF casualties.

Jets then were even more of a liability at night than piston fighters, owing to their higher speeds!

And if the Luftwaffe had encountered RAF jets in 1940, then I am confident in saying that THEIR jet program would have been accelerated (it certainly could have been), so perhaps the course of the war would have been changed!

Ifs and buts - you gotta love 'em!

SD
Saab Dastard is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 23:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if the Meteor had been in service in 1940, then the Luftwaffe would have taken even more severe losses
.
But the He280 flew 6 months....as a viable fighter BTW,. before the Gloster E28/39,[an "experimental" aeroplane] first flew.
IF the Luftwaffe [and Mr "H"] had developed this aeroplane, I think it very unlikely that any "Offensive Sorties" would have taken place by either Fighter, or Bomber Command....unless the RAF had [at the very least parity] to contend with the said jets. The USAAF were shaken by the Me163 and the Me262. And a lot of other surprises.
watp,iktch

Last edited by chiglet; 1st Sep 2007 at 23:36. Reason: Syntax and Research
chiglet is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2007, 05:34
  #4 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meteor F8
HotDog is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2007, 06:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oxenfforrdde
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember reading an anecdote by a 'stang jock ( may have been in an old 8AF yearbook ), to the effect that a 262 attacking a B17 had something like a 5-8 ( ? ) to 1 advantage on the defending P51's, as it could just speed round the Bomber & shoot
Tyres O'Flaherty is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2007, 07:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: vic australia
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lack of range

g/day all.i did read somewhere that the 262s range was a big problem and lack of experienced pilots.i wonder just how many pilots were lost in converting from props to jets?.
wayoutwest is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2007, 10:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: France
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would this have provided a significant advantage in the Battle of Britain?
I believe that the answer to that question is NO. I've flown the Spitfire and have more hours on Vampires than I care to remember and in the context of the question once the immediate surprise was over the Spitfire would be my choice.
You have to remember that the Vampire 1 and the early Meteors had 50 minutes fuel max if you were not tanking around in a dog fight, so by the time you had climbed up and found what you were looking for it was time to land and refuel. The piston engined fighters of the day were much more manouverable than the early jets and would have run rings around them, I do not believe that many Mustangs for example were shot down by Me 262s.
shack is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.