Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Steam gages

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jun 2006, 13:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steam gages

Virtually all aircraft pre-glass-cockpit used instruments of a standard panel-hole dimension - either 3 1/8" or 2 1/4". There were exceptions - the old artificial horizon was larger.

But what is the origin of these dimension standards? Did Kollsman or one of the other companies establish the dimensions? Or was it a military specification?
barit1 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2006, 19:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Generally, on civil types, these standard deminsions were developed by Kollsman, Sperry, and Collins.
On the DC-6 for example, the panels were precut at the factory in Santa Monica, with a standard layout, then fitted with the avionics and instruments specified by the specific airline customer.
Radar was not generally used on civil types (again, DC-6 for example) and was added later...not a bright tube display either, it required a hood to read the display in the daylight.

Ah...the good 'ole days.
411A is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2006, 00:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Geez, I remember using that hood on the DC-3. We had an ex-executive machine, CF-ORD, that came to us from an auto manufacturer that shall remain nameless. It had the dash 94 engines, weather radar and the one-piece windshield. Thought we'd hit the big time.

The only Viscount I've got stick time on had the weather radar down by the left side of the Captain's seat. Was that an aberration, or was that the usual location?
pigboat is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2006, 03:46
  #4 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally a military specification.

We old RAF instrument bashers were led to believe it was standardisation for wartime production. Wartime mass-production meant using as many common parts as possible and instruments were no exception. For example, instrument cases and their glass faces from the same manufacturer often shared the same part numbers across instrument ranges - altimeters, airspeed indicators, VSIs and even RPM indicators might all share the same face plate and glass.

Aircraft of all types had what was called a "standard blind flying panel' installed. It wasn't just a standard layout either - you could even draw a complete blind flying panel from stock and just hook up the hoses. Take note of the way the same standard panel is integrated into both a Lancaster pilot's panel and a Stirling. You might find exactly the same panel integrated into the pilot's panel in any other type of aircraft.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2006, 04:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah yes, only the radar that the Captain can see.
Good show, on these types, as this keeps the co-pilot in the mushroom syndrome...

Just kidding....maybe.
411A is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2006, 04:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kelowna Wine Country
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 10 Posts
Yes, but why 3.1/8th" and 2.1/4" Somewhat odd sizes to choose for no particular reason.
ChrisVJ is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2006, 09:25
  #7 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think its something to do with basing instrument dimensions on the watchmakers' ligne as a calibre measure for watches.
So we can blame the Swiss...
Blacksheep is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.