Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

Action against Concorde official

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Action against Concorde official

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Sep 2005, 07:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Action against Concorde official

BBC Radio Five just announced that action is to be taken against an official for the Concorde 2000 event

Last edited by G-CPTN; 27th Sep 2005 at 07:42.
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 08:21
  #2 (permalink)  
A4

Ut Sementem Feeceris
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,462
Received 149 Likes on 30 Posts
???????
A4 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 08:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,816
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
The only link I can find to this story is from Pravda:

http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2005/09/27/63790.html

Personally I think that they're barking up the wrong tree and should look much more closely at Air France's operation of the aeroplane.

RTOW vs. ATOW on the day? Maintenance? CRM?

Last edited by BEagle; 27th Sep 2005 at 08:47.
BEagle is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 09:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with Beags re this accident, but there is also the fact that tyre failure led to fuel tank rupture, which could be considered a basic design defect.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 09:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South East UK
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The official in question is, I understand, Henri Perrier, who was fairly senior in the Concorde programme. Quite what this will achieve is beyond me.
Kalium Chloride is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 10:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's up on the Beeb now...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4285832.stm

Seems a bit of a pointless excercise now...

Nige
Nige321 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2005, 10:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A significant number of accidents have been preceded by incidents which point to a future problem; a BA Concorde suffered similar damage in an earlier incident, take-off rejected below V1, and a happy ending.

The tragedy is that the expensive modifications were not required to be done until there were enough bodies at the end of the runway.

TP
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 00:07
  #8 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From Sky News:-
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...445692,00.html
A manslaughter case has been opened against the former head of the Concorde programme over the fatal crash near Paris in 2000.
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 11:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was going to comment on this in another place, under another alias, but decided that the possible reasons for why this charge has been brought now and whether the outcome has already been decided, were just too 'French' for me.

The French Authorities and Legal System are sometimes in opposition but often appear to be 'in bed' together, especially when it is felt a scapegoat is required, or at least appearances must be maintained.

Whoops my cynicism is showing!.
DIH
Opssys is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 11:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oppsy...

You're cynicism is really showing... you're probably right BTW.

After all Air France and the Paris airports could not be blamed for it.. those damn Americans with their shoddy maintenace and an aircraft that was knowningly dangerous certified by two independent national operators and operated by two national carriers was the real cause....nothing to do with us guv...

Last edited by mfaff; 30th Sep 2005 at 13:07.
mfaff is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 15:16
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Paphos Cyprus
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Concord

What about the spacer on the underrcariage that the Air France engineers failed to correct.
Defiantly is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2005, 13:08
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Missing spacer.... well it wasn't really a problem....its effect was marginal.. that's why it was there in the first place....
mfaff is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2005, 13:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well something was going very wrong for a very long time.

And what was (really) done about it? Below from Air France Accident Report.
------------------

Research was undertaken to find incidents which had involved tyres or landing gear on the Concorde since its entry into service. The information collected to establish the list of events came from the archives of EADS, Air France, British Airways, BEA, AAIB, DGAC, CAA and Dunlop.

The list in the appendix shows information from events coming from at least two different sources or for which reports or detailed information exist.

In the list, there are fifty-seven cases of tyre bursts/deflations, thirty for the Air France fleet and twenty-seven for British Airways :

Twelve of these events had structural consequences on the wings and/or the tanks, of which six led to penetration of the tanks.

Nineteen of the tyre bursts/deflations were caused by foreign objects.

Twenty-two events occurred during takeoff.

Only one case of tank penetration by a piece of tyre was noted.

None of the events showed any rupture of a tank or a fire, whether leading or not to a significant simultaneous loss of power on two engines.
forget is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.