Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

End of the line for the B717 / MD80 / DC9

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

End of the line for the B717 / MD80 / DC9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jan 2005, 09:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 495
Received 11 Likes on 1 Post
Unhappy End of the line for the B717 / MD80 / DC9

The end of an era.

"The Boeing Co. will announce this morning that it has decided to stop production of its 717 jetliner after the remaining backlog of airplanes has been built, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer has learned.

The 717 is a 100-seat jet, previously known as the MD-95, and was inherited in Boeing's 1997 merger with McDonnell Douglas. The plane is assembled in Long Beach, Calif.

It has suffered from slow sales, and Boeing had previously considered closing the line. Boeing has sold 169 of the jets and delivered 137. At the current production rate of about one plane a month, the line is likely to be shut down sometime in 2006."

S & L
CaptainSandL is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2005, 10:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Quahog
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wish I could say I'm surprised but Boeing itself treated a good aircraft as its stepchild and that coupled with the fact that it was competeing with 737-600 sealed its fate a while ago.

Its a pity as it was probably one of the sexier aircraft around
Capt. Glenn Quagmire is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2005, 11:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
How on Earth did this get moved to History and Nostalgia?!!!

This is DEFINITELY News (or a Rumour!)
Groundloop is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2005, 11:56
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 495
Received 11 Likes on 1 Post
Looks like the Mods are trying to bury the aircraft even faster than Boeing. Very sad.
CaptainSandL is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2005, 13:04
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's confirmed so it's definitely today's news:

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/...r_050114a.html
brabazon is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2005, 15:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know Turkmenistan still have 2 on order but who are the other customers who have the 717 on order? Will they change these orders to the similar sized B737-600?

Fried Chicken
Fried_Chicken is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2005, 16:19
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 495
Received 11 Likes on 1 Post
Midwest Airlines said today that an announcement by the Boeing Company that it expects to discontinue manufacturing Boeing 717-200 jet aircraft in mid-2006 has no bearing on the airline's continued growth. Midwest Airlines currently operates 17 Boeing 717 aircraft and has a firm order for eight more.

"There are a number of aircraft that meet our current and future needs," said Timothy E. Hoeksema, chairman and chief executive officer. "Going forward, we will be assessing our alternatives and also determining whether we want to exercise any of the options we are holding on 717s." Midwest holds options for 25 additional 717s.
CaptainSandL is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2005, 18:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Bedfordshire
Age: 43
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought Germanwings were trying out the 717 (from Spanair I think) too see about its viability?
No comment is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2005, 10:09
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: York
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 717 seems a very rare aircraft just like the MD11 and never really took off from their older sisters the MD80 and the DC10 respectivley.
G-BBAE is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2005, 11:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From What I've Heard, there is a difference between the 717 and the MD-11.

The 717 seems to be accepted as a good product, while the MD-11 had operational iissues. Issues such as not meeting performance predictions and touchy landings.
seacue is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2005, 12:16
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: socal
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another beautiful type, and era (the DC-9 series) about to fade away. It seems like soon we will only be left with nothing but under-wing 2 and 4 engine jets, and the monstrous A380.
Flightluuvr is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2005, 21:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: York
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was once a rumour that Boeing were going to make a MD12 an advanced version of the MD11.
Maybe Airbus could make a trijet version of the A330/A340 and call it the A360?
G-BBAE is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2005, 22:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SE Asia
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flew on it several times with Bangkok Airways..nice plane from a pax perspective I thought..
View From The Ground is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2005, 08:15
  #14 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sadly, I suppose it comes down to the position in the product lifecycle and the internal politics witin Boeing.

Does it make sense to have two internally competing products (717/736) and to maintain two production facilities with different training needs, equipment etc.

I'll be sad to see the nd of the line though, I've travelled on most of the '9s and to the short bodied 10 to the Super 80 and only last summer had me first flight on a 717 with Olympic.

They are, comfortable, way to travel, unless stuck next to an engine.
 
Old 17th Jan 2005, 02:36
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy darn the luck

Long time reader first time poster.... this one made me finally register and reply.
I for one think Boeing should have pushed the 717 a little harder, it sucks to be the red headed step child.
I admit I never flew it but have one good friend that did and he spoke very highly of it. Of course he was also an engineer on it so he may be biased!

by the by I don't mean second officer!

Last edited by dmbfarmer; 17th Jan 2005 at 03:46.
dmbfarmer is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2005, 17:18
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the end of the 717, what plans do Boeing have for Long Beach? Just the C17 built there now & the plans for a Civil variant of this large freighter have come to nothing.

Fried Chicken
Fried_Chicken is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2005, 19:27
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Housing
The William Lyon Company is a major developer in Southern California, and it has had a plan before the Long Beach Planning Commission for a while now to build homes on the Boeing land that adjoins the airport.
Quickly followed by NIMBYism no doubt.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2005, 21:24
  #18 (permalink)  
Skylark_air
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Arrow There she goes...

Another good aircraft going to on the Desert Run, all in the name of profit.

Shame on Boeing, a company where they motto should be:

Betraying
Old classic and well
Engineered aircraft
In the name of profit
Not learning anything because of their
Grasp on the industry
 
Old 17th Jan 2005, 22:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: west of the Tamar
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

V. sad news, the DC-9/MD-80, and more recently, the B717 were always among my favourite aircraft.

I've fond memories flying jump seat in DC-9-10's (circa 1965 vintage) in Mexico in 1999, and DC-9-30's (circa 1968 vintage) in 2003. The crews loved them, and flew them like fighters, often as not with no working autopilot. Real steam-gauge cockpit instrumentation, and all the better for it! Visual approaches into some of the southern Mexican airports, in valleys surrounded by mountain ranges,sych as Tuxtla, were beautifully executed,with neat turns on to finals at around 3 miles. Estupendo!
kala87 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2005, 05:25
  #20 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The DC9/MD80/B717 was certainly one of the nicest aeroplanes to ride as a passenger. I shall miss it; but really! - all the better for steam-gauge cockpit instrumentation kala?

In this old instrument basher's expert opinion, those instruments were unreliable, inaccurate and extremely hard to keep in operational condition. People who have the skills and know-how to strip them down and repair them are getting scarce too. They were always in short supply anyway, and this clumsy Line guy found his occasional compulsory exiles to the instrument calibration lab particularly hard to bear. No-one can be bothered with the level of dedication needed to master the skills these days and I don't blame them.

Back to Boeing and Douglas. Just after Boeing took over McDonnell Douglas the next issue of Boeing's Airliner house magazine carried a picture on the inside front cover of the Boeing DC3!! Now that took some cheek, eh? At least they didn't dare to put it on the front page...
Blacksheep is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.