Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

V-Force, 4-engine starts

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

V-Force, 4-engine starts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Nov 2004, 15:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
V-Force, 4-engine starts

This was discussed here a while back. There is a thread running in Questions about this. Although it started from multi-engine starts on modern commercial machines, the thread has drifted to the V-Force. Might someone with a memory be able to step over there and clear up a question or two? Cheers.

--------------------
"I tell you, we are here on Earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2004, 06:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Not quite. The 'Mass Rapid' was rather more than simultaneous rapid start as it also put the alternators on line and started all the PFCUs. It put a lot of strain on the aircraft systems and was very hazardous. I believe it went out of service when nuclear QRA responsibility was handed over to the RN's Polaris submarines.

Any Vulcan with charged air bottles could carry out a 'combustor' rapid start of the associated engines; however, it was often easier to start one using the rapid start, then crossbleed via the 'Engine Airs' to the others, either individually at 70% or simultaneously at 93%, for 'normal' starts.

A 4 engine 'ripple rapid' was rarely needed - and towards the end of their lives, most Vulcans didn't have fully serviceable rapid start systems.

The normal, safer way to start the Vulcan was to carry out individual starts using external air, not the rapid start system.
BEagle is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2004, 10:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 100
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I seem to recall that the engine start airbottles needed to be charged to 6000psi. Quite how that was done (extenal bottles or internal a/c charging):
------------------------------------------------

The airbottles were re-charged from external bottles, there was no facility for a/c charging.
RFCC is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2004, 20:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Each bottle of four was charged to 3300psi, externally charged - there was no on-board replenishment system. It was PRV'd to 300psi for combustion - hence you could get several starts out of a bottle, although normally the bottles would be recharged routinely during AF servicing.
FJJP is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 16:15
  #5 (permalink)  
"Trust Me"
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Egham, UK
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They used to show a video in the belly of the Vulcan at Hendon of a mass start -lots of cables attached to the rear of the planes that automatically unplugged, so I always assumed that this was where the power came from.

But by the time the last plane was airborne, he must have been IMC due to the smoke!!

DOC
DOC.400 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2004, 12:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Wonderful Midlands
Age: 53
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was the capacity for 6 individual engine starts, 3 on each side, using the compressed air system.
The Rocket is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2004, 15:10
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
The Victor Bomber had bottles in both wings so all 4 could be started simultaneously. The left hand bottles were removed from the tanker, so you could only start 3 and 4 by combusting. 1 and 2 could be crossfed with the running engines at 75%. An air charge of 2800psi would give you 2 engine satrts, 1500psi one. The Victor could combust start with just LV power, i.e. the 28V batteries only. On the tanker, it was handy for starting on remote stands with little support. I tried it on more than one occasion.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2004, 17:05
  #8 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
DW: When you use the term: " tried it on more than one occasion." it almost sounds like you were testing it for other than operational reasons. And, surely, that can't be true?

--------------------
"I tell you, we are here on Earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2004, 22:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Using a lot systems on the Victor seemed to be an attempt at the intended! But seriously, what I should have said was 'I used it on more than one occasion'. We had no limitations on using the combust sytem in peacetime. In fact, we had a policy of using every now and again just to see if it worked - which it usually did.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2004, 20:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 stories:

While on the OCU as a studnet I was a guard commander on a dispersal at Scampton during a TACEVAL. One night the order to scramble came and the captain of the nearest Vulcan to us hit the rapid start - instead of the usual 'whee - whoosh - roar' noise there was a 'whee - phut' repeated at least 4 times and then silence. It seems the groundcrew had managed to fill the system with nitrogen - not very good for supporting combustion.

Later in life I was involved in 4-ship scrambles where we used a ripple-rapid start. The captain pressed the 4 buttons in turn and then he monitored engines one and 2 and the co monitored 3 and 4. This was used rather than the mass rapid button to both avoid starting all of the PFCUs simultaneously and to give more chance to monitor the individual engines. Prior to start we had the AAPP (APU these days) running to give us 200 volts ac; we used to start the PFCUs using this which was not approved but it gave us less to do after engine start. The throttles would be set to half open and so, when it was time to move we just took the brakes off, started to roll, briefly brought the throttles back to close the bleed valves and then opened them up fully; 4 aircraft airborne 90 seconds after the scramble call leaving behind an IMC airfield - always impressive. For the public displays we were allowed to take-off as long as we'd managed to start 3 of the 4 engines - we'd sort the other one out once airborne!
Stan Evil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.