Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

Why None Of These Flying ?

Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Why None Of These Flying ?

Old 22nd Oct 2003, 21:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: back at the grind stone
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Why None Of These Flying ?

With all the great historic british machines gracing our skies and airshows. Why have certain ones been left out or are poorly represented, while others are found in multiples, even with the same operator / group.

Are there an airworthyness issues involved or are we all just fixated with spitfires etc.

Ones that spring to mind:
Fairly Gannet, what a monster and an airworthy T5 is for sale in the US, plus I heard someone did look at restoring a AEW one at Sandtoft ?? What happended.

PB Deffiant. Is there one still under restoration to fly ??

Mozzy: Has no one any interest in getting one flying again. I remember seeing a almost complete advanced project for sale in Canada ??

Anyone care to add some more??
Oscar Duece is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2003, 22:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gloster Javelin, Supermarine Swift?

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2003, 22:45
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,090
Received 34 Likes on 16 Posts
Four reasons I think

(1) It takes a lot of work to gain initial approval of a type, but once one of a type is approved, everybody else can jump on the bandwagon.

(2) It takes a lot of money

(3) There are very few Engineers in this country with the ability and authorisation to "recommend" to CAA that an aeroplane, new to the civil register, should be allowed to fly.

(4) Spares supplies vary enormously depending upon type, age and how it was retired from service by the military.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 00:40
  #4 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 59
Posts: 11,785
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
There's only one Defiant left in the RAF museum, though I think a couple of non-airworthy replcias are under way wiht some original parts...

There was a flying Gannet on the UK reg, not sure where it is now...

Over and out, my pint's getting warm...
treadigraph is online now  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 02:13
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: back at the grind stone
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

My question was aimed at the types that don't have technical issues. Such as the Javelin, who has enough trouble technically getting airborne in its service days let alone now.

It is after seeing how much support and hard cash has been raised for the Vulcan in the hope of getting it airbourne, with no firm plan (if it's really lottery of bust, why wasn't I told that before stumping up 50-00). when for a fraction of that money we could have a Gannet or such others, not currently flying and not subject to complex technical issues, in our skies again.

Yes the Gannet was operated on a civvy reg on the late eighties, that one is at Sandtoft, where it will rot away like everything else there, Vampires, Provosts (piston), Meteor and B25.

While the like of the BBMF have 7 spitfires, but no mozzy, lysander etc and the RNHF have 3 stringbags, but no Gannet, Fury or Sea Hawk ?, Sycamore, Wessex.

When examples of all these, are out there waiting support and cash to get unique examples flying again.

So how about trading a spit for the Canada mozzy ? Or do they need all 7 to keep the British public reminded that the spitfire won the war sinlge handed.
Oscar Duece is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 06:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hampshire, UK
Age: 41
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The RNHF have the three Stringbags as they each represent the different variants that served with the Fleet Air Arm; the Mk.I (W5856) II (LS326) and III (NF389).
They do of course have a Sea Fury and Sea Hawk, though both under repair at the moment.

In the 1980's The Royal Navy had a few Gannets in store for possible use with the RNHF, as well as a Harvard.
Unfortunately when the Navy pulled out of financing the Flight they had to be sold to raise much needed finance.
In fact XT752, the Gannet up for sale in the US was one of those aircraft.
fradu is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 06:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Various
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Gannet in question?

http://www.courtesyaircraft.com/n752XT.htm

Pretty interesting price. Wonder if it's in shape for a pond crossing?
StbdD is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 12:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Just South of the last ice sheet
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Halifax, preferably the Hali III.

Realistically though, I'm looking forward to seeing a few Ansons, and the Duxford Beaufighter take to the air again. Agreed with the point above re BoBMF Spitsto a certain extent although it is nice to see the difference between the different marks. Maybe a few (pun not intended) could be sacrified to finance a Mossie rebuild.

PS When are they going to realise that there were no Dakotas or Lancasters in the BoB? Overdue for a name change methinks.
LowNSlow is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 15:16
  #9 (permalink)  

I'matightbastard
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never realised the Gannet had two engines.

What do they mean by quoting engine and prop time in units? That's a new one to me as I've only ever seen hours.
Onan the Clumsy is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 16:26
  #10 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,090
Received 34 Likes on 16 Posts
It's a more complex system than hours, used by a number of military aircraft - basically it's measured by an internal device which takes into account the "severity" of useage. It's more realistic in terms of component life and maintenance scheduling.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 16:40
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: back at the grind stone
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

That T5 Gannet in the states look temptong doesn't it. Low hour airframe and good engine times.
I must admit I don't know exactly what the engine setup is. What is a Double Mamba engine, and who thought of that name for it ??
Oscar Duece is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 16:47
  #12 (permalink)  
JDK
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Covering the Commonwealth
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A broad thread.
The interest in Spitfires seems to be exponentially greater than any other aircraft; the BBMF are locked in a vicious cycle, and it's not their fault. At least they are preserving them! At one stage they were the only Hurricane operators in the world. That, at least is much better, and (quite an achievement) they are still operating 2 Hurris.

Defiant. One survivor, nailed to the ground by the RAF Museum. Missing the underside outer wing bolts and the tyres have no inner tubes. One 'full scale model' by the Boulton Paul Society in Wolves. Nice, but not a flyer!

Let's say you get the Defiant off the RAF Museum and under rebuild to fly. These days you can, with a lot of money go get P-51, Spitfire, Harvard (etc) parts from the nice suppliers, and the paperwork is not all 'new type'. The Defiant will all be new and nothing will be off the shelf. Think, it's a Merlin, but the coolant setup, fuel supply etc, while not really hard to redo, will be a one off...

If I recall correctly, the Canadian Mozzie project by the Zaleskys was good, but expensive. Projects are generally. There is one Mozzie being restored to fly in British Columbia, and a series new build production in N.Z. by a retired yacht designer builder. There's speculation about the Flighter Collection's example. Bigger = much more expensive + difficult.

Richard Melton has a Walrus kit for restoration, avaliable for sale. It's unique (only three other grounded survivors) but no-one's bought it. I'd love to see it fly, but those with money are apparently not bothered!

The LAST Blackburn Beverley is under threat of scapping at the closed Museum of Army Transport - despite interest and effort by some enthusiasts, led by the Yorkshire Air Museum, many enthusiasts have taken a 'so what' or 'it's big, difficult and I can't see the point' attitude.

Hope this adds a bit...
Cheers
James
JDK is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 18:06
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Midlands
Age: 70
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gannet

I bet somebody in the RNHF will - in 20 years time - say, why the heck didn't we buy that airworthy Gannet/ spares for a hundred grand (probably a lot less in reality) in 2003?

I thing it would attract a lot of interest here and should be repatriated.

Two Mambas, gearbox and contraprop sounds like a case of - take out your wallet and repeat after me 'help yourself' as far as a civvy operator is concerned but with the RN volunteer/ knowhow it surely should be considered.

I know it will never replace the Firefly......

BTW - re they planning to acquire another??

HP
Hairyplane is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 19:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lichfield UK
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re:
"Mozzy: Has no one any interest in getting one flying again. I remember seeing a almost complete advanced project for sale in Canada ??"

Whats happened to Kermit Week's TT35 RS712 in Florida??

Did hear that it wasnt flying much but if its still extant - surely theres a viable purchase??

That Gannet certainly deserves to be back home dos'nt it, and what happened to that equally gorgous Sea Venom that flies in the US??

The Shack AEW2 should make the trek east also along with the ETPS Lightning thats being restored in Minneapolis (same crowd who have the Gannet??)
hairyclameater is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 19:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Usually Oz
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Kermit's "Mossie" is in the EAA Museum at OSH. Serviceability unknown, but good luck if you think you can get it out of there!!??

G'day
Feather #3 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 20:12
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Edge of the fens
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mossies

RS712 is unserviceable, suffering from severe delamination by all accounts. The American climate hasn't been kind to her. She's been inside the EAA Museum building at Oshkosh since at least October 1993 when I photographed her there.

TV959 (the TFC - but thought now to be EX TFC - machine) is potentially restorable to fly, with a two year timescale mentioned. Although that would require a) a vast sum of money, and b) her alleged new owner to be willing to return her to flight.

Glyn Powell is currently manufacturing Mosquito fuselages in New Zealand, but his first one has taken an age and is 'only' a static. Airworthy ones would presumably take a lot of time and money (bit of a recurring theme here...)

So never say never (just be ready with an open chequebook )
BeauMan is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2003, 01:50
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Various
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The N reg Sea Venom was on the North America airshow circuit this summer.

http://www.fotodj.com/pages/dayton2003/WB583D.htm
StbdD is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2003, 04:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: due south
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
StbbD, That looks like an ordinary single seat ex Swiss Venom to me.

The Sea Venom was a twin seat night fighter version.
henry crun is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2003, 06:17
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Various
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good eye Henry,

To be honest, I thought the Sea Venom was a two seater as well and you are right, that one doesn't look that big, nor does its nose look like a radome. However, the one pictured is N-202DM which is listed as a "DH112 Sea Venom" on the FAA Registry. How could the feds possibly get that wrong?

De Havilland apparently produced 816 single seat Venoms, 283 night fighters and 393 Sea Venoms. How many versions was the designation DH112 used for?

You are also correct about it being ex Swiss AF. Produced in 1955, serial number J1616.

I better go break out the recognition books.

Bonus shot anyway!:

http://www.richard-seaman.com/Aircra...egrees0930.jpg
StbdD is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2003, 04:00
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: RUGBY
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Greetings

I agree about all the british aviation history that is not flying and should be, at least in this country

maybe we should have a word with those nice chaps in South Africa if they will send us over a couple of Lightnings or Buckaneers (hope ive spelt it rite). And maybe Atlantic will get chance to bring thier shak over from the USA.

I know it costs alot of cash to do it but maybe, just maybe

See Ya

LT
LIGHT TANNING is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.