PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   ATC vote to take Protected Industrial action against Airservices Australia. (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/658357-atc-vote-take-protected-industrial-action-against-airservices-australia.html)

Ken Borough 2nd Apr 2024 01:25


Last big ATC strike, I believe was in 1977.
Was not that a strike by a mob called the PREI (technicians) rather than ATCOs?

ManillaChillaDilla 2nd Apr 2024 01:30

Best of Luck Ladies and Gentlemen.

It is about time you were properly recognised and remunerated.

MCD




10JQKA 2nd Apr 2024 01:49


Originally Posted by Ken Borough (Post 11627744)
Was not that a strike by a mob called the PREI (technicians) rather than ATCOs?

Think u may be right. I think last serious ATC industrial action was early 1989 just before the pilots' strike.

missy 2nd Apr 2024 02:16


Originally Posted by 10JQKA (Post 11627750)
Think u may be right. I think last serious ATC industrial action was early 1989 just before the pilots' strike.

From Civil Air site:

January 1989 The Sydney ATC Dispute begins. Principal catalyst for action is lack of staffing requiring excessive use of overtime.

10 April 1989 Commissioner Sheather – Order that bans and limitations at Sydney and Melbourne be lifted immediately.

13 April 1989 CommissionerSheather decision – “Reasonable Overtime” - One overtime shift or other overtime up to a maximum of seven hours overtime in any fortnightly period.

28 June 1989 Justice Munro decision on “stand down”. History of case involved industrial activity at Mascot Airport. Approved CAA application for insertion of stand down clauses.

4 September 1989 Industrial Relations Commission Full Bench decision released on the Sydney dispute.
Note: Principal catalyst for action is lack of staffing requiring excessive use of overtime.

In 1989 a restriction was placed on the number of consecutive shifts that ATCs could work (10 shifts), prior to that there was no maximum. This was inserted into the Enterprise Agreement, Airservices has been trying to get rid of this 10 shift limitation ever since.

12-47 2nd Apr 2024 03:12

950 odd controllers, plenty to go round supposedly, shouldn't be too much of an issue getting an overtime ban approved as part of PIA then?

Traffic_Is_Er_Was 2nd Apr 2024 03:15

So....they'll refuse to put out the fires that aren't there?

we_were_inverted 2nd Apr 2024 03:58

I hope the ARFF get the substantial raise that they deserve and which is well overdue.


DROPS 2nd Apr 2024 07:10

Maximum 7 hr per fornight! 😆😆😆

So factor in that people are currently doing up to 30h OT per fornight - and there are STILL airspace closures almost every day, what do you think the effect of an OT withdrawal under PIA might be?

Duck Pilot 2nd Apr 2024 13:24

TIBA and now this, can’t be doing good for the ICAO rating…

10JQKA 2nd Apr 2024 21:22

Not sure why but mods have merged the ARFF and ATC thread into one which is weird and now confusing. I don't understand why this was done.

framer 3rd Apr 2024 02:23

Nor I.
It would be like merging two threads where one is talking about the QF Engineers industrial situation and the other is talking about QF pilots and their industrial situation.

DROPS 3rd Apr 2024 16:10

Moderator.
Please reconstitute the original separate threads

10JQKA 3rd Apr 2024 20:36

Received this on 3rd April......

Hello 10JQKA

Your thread "ARFF vote to take Protected Industrial Action against Airservices..." has been merged into to ATC vote to take Protected Industrial action against Airservices Australia. by our moderator team. We encourage you to continue your discussion in this new location.

Thank you!

UnderneathTheRadar 4th Apr 2024 02:03

It's a pre-emptive move by the mods in anticipation it going the way of most threads in here which run on a merry-go-around of Virgin to Qantas to Bonza to Rex and back again

we_were_inverted 4th Apr 2024 02:36

It would be so easy for AsA to avoid all of this.

Acknowledge the work their staff has done by simply paying them what they’re worth (industry standard, not unreasonable) without asking them to sacrifice conditions in return.

Dealing with the continual and increasing short staffing, the increasingly complex workload, the worse and worse rosters etc is all the more manageable when you’re being compensated appropriately.

In the meantime how many more have got their applications in for UAE / Oman / Germany etc?

CaptainMidnight 4th Apr 2024 07:52


Originally Posted by Ken Borough (Post 11627744)
Was not that a strike by a mob called the PREI (technicians) rather than ATCOs?

There was an ATC strike on when I was doing field training after graduating from the college in early 1979.

I wandered around the then "AMEN" looking at and in aircraft .....

DROPS 4th Apr 2024 20:44


Originally Posted by we_were_inverted (Post 11628953)
It would be so easy for AsA to avoid all of this.

Acknowledge the work their staff has done by simply paying them what they’re worth (industry standard, not unreasonable) without asking them to sacrifice conditions in return.

Dealing with the continual and increasing short staffing, the increasingly complex workload, the worse and worse rosters etc is all the more manageable when you’re being compensated appropriately.

In the meantime how many more have got their applications in for UAE / Oman / Germany etc?

It jas gotten so bad people are actually going back to HKG.

Gas Chamber 5th Apr 2024 08:18

What happened?
Did treating highly skilled people like **** and paying them peanuts not work out?!
We’re closing airspace and towers because they can’t find staff now.
Travelling public might be interested in the lack of safety at most regional airports now, and don’t mention the near miss I had at Sydney airport last year. We made the newspaper on that one (staff shortages and low time departure controller).
How about some managers realise they actually need to pay people a liveable wage or they’ll go elsewhere.
Same situation as Australian airlines. It’s not this hard.
PAY people for their expertise and experience.

DROPS 5th Apr 2024 15:11


Originally Posted by Gas Chamber (Post 11629596)
What happened?
Did treating highly skilled people like **** and paying them peanuts not work out?!
We’re closing airspace and towers because they can’t find staff now.
Travelling public might be interested in the lack of safety at most regional airports now, and don’t mention the near miss I had at Sydney airport last year. We made the newspaper on that one (staff shortages and low time departure controller).
How about some managers realise they actually need to pay people a liveable wage or they’ll go elsewhere.
Same situation as Australian airlines. It’s not this hard.
PAY people for their expertise and experience.

We paid the Airservices CEO over $1M a year.

It must also not be a liveable wage based on performance.delivered?

Perhaps he will also go elsewhere?

​​​​​​

gordonfvckingramsay 6th Apr 2024 10:06

Perversely no one will listen until there is an actual accident. Near misses are seen viewed by our regulator as a successfully managed event with a safe outcome.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.