New Satellites for ATC
 

Soon, we will have more satellites then aircraft overhead Oz..

“..Australian-made satellites will soon be launched on a SpaceX rocket in a move designed to close gaps in the country's air traffic management.

They will help limit turbulence and ensure planes take the most efficient routes..”


https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-...ites/101813614

…….and being uniquely Australian, the system will require special equipment that is pricey and has no international support.

Why do these idiots keep making stupid technological decisions?

There is a huge trail…….. The NB N, Seasprite, at least four naval ship projects, not including Collins class or nukes, onesky(?) and soon - offshore wind farms.

you forgot DMEA.

The Australian government purchasing policy for office supplies when applied correctly would require the sharp ends of a box of HB pencils to be cut off and the blunt ends sharpened "to suit Australian conditions".

Gne

I expected your negativity to pop up.

What’s to say it’s not internationally supported?

Regardless, the concept is fantastic and might push more countries to do it.

Is he wrong in this case? Probably not. NBN being a case in point. Third world countries have better internet, And have a look at any armed forces acquisition over the last 20 years. Don't underestimate an Australians ability to **** up a project.

I’m not saying that bad decisions haven’t been made with various projects, but this is basically putting ADSB receivers on satellites is how I read it. It’s not like they’re reinventing the wheel to do it.

Yes, but I'm tipping there'll be Australian interfaces with the purchased technology, Australian involvement is usually the problem. Australia tends not to buy 'off the shelf' they buy it, modify it and **** it up.

The most successful defence acquisition was the C-17 because it was off the shelf or nothing. Every time some mister-set-the-world-afire hero interferes with a defence spec it gets f*cked up. Actually, not just defence…ATC, NBN, highways, etc. Its all second rate at a very high price.

OneSky reported to be $4b and rising. And, according to one project manager - "a job for life". Sigh.

Morno; Dear sweet Morno, I admire your optimism.

However; bad decisions have been made on so many government projects that its the successful ones that are the exception.

Yes, space based ADSB is a noble and virtuous project.

But your observation: "It’s not like they’re reinventing the wheel to do it." You Sir have yet to engage with the Australian bureaucratic mind!

Morno, to these folks, there is no international standard or product that cannot be (a) improved; (b) tinkered with for fun; (c) modified "to better suit Australian conditions"; (d) perverted into a gravy train for interested parties; or all four at once.

The change can be very subtle so that the damage is not apparent for many years after the money is spent.

For a hypothetical example, with reference to chapter 3 of the rough guide to the ADSB format,

https://mode-s.org/decode/book-the_1...-junzi_sun.pdf

Lets say I am a senior bureaucrat with an interest in bushwalking. lets add a teensy new ADSB message that allows "us" to use the system to track feral horses in Kosciusko national park.

There are stupid people around who make such changes,

Why not just use Aireon? It’s up and running.

No point in having efficient routes and efficient aircraft if you're going to get slowed down by feeder fix times. Fix the bottlenecks first by building those parallel runways they've been talking about in MEL and PER for the last few decades.

“In the vast majority of cases the capacity of an airport is determined not by the number or length of runways but by the ability of the surrounding airspace system and infrastructure to deliver aircraft to those runways and accept departures from them.”

Where the infrastructure includes the procedures, airspace classification, ATS available.

Gne

Having just returned from the USA, I was amazed how quickly they move aircraft there. One was just starting to roll, whilst we were being lined up. Cleared for takeoff as the other is just getting airborne.

Not like Australia where you are at the holding point, one is already upwind and turning, another aircraft on a 3nm final and told to wait.

They often had 3 runways operating the same time, including cross strips. Is it just a lack of ability in the system here in Oz or what?

If we have auto release on, we do that regularly over west. No reason it can't be done here depending on spacing requirements and a few other considerations. Can't speak for other aerodromes.

Denver would have to be one of the best designed airports I've ever operated in to with 4 parallel north/south runways and two east/west parallels that don't cross at any point. And in places like Los Angeles and San Francisco, you get cleared to land even though you're on final with two other aircraft ahead of you on shorter finals, also cleared to land. This kind of thing would give Aussie authorities heart failures.

More context required. Was it a runway being used exclusively for departures? What was the traffic mix L, M, H, S? Were all the aircraft departing from the same holding point?

If this provides on-ground ADS-B and VHF comms with ATC in the iron pentagon the Pilbara, it will be fantastic.

The problem lies with you mate, probably never seen how a real ATC system works, probably sitting back throbbing over listening to the 'guardian of the Australian skies' rubbish you get plied with on linkedin.

Jetpig,
I am a few years out of ATC by now, but from what I can glean Aireon does not include a communication option; it seems to be ADS-B only.

The missing link may be real-time voice comms (any trans-Pacific pilots care to comment?). If this is the problem then Aireon seems not to be the answer, perhaps this is the niche that Skykraft has identified? As I recall this is still also an issue for some parts of Australia where HF still has to be used; and I imagine there are also vast tracts of the rest of the world where HF is still in use.

Best of luck to Mark Skidmore and his company.