Originally Posted by SandyPalms
(Post 11224027)
Ollie. They are 2 different orders for A321xlr's.
I've also heard that they are different engine types. JQ CFM and QF P&W
|
Originally Posted by SandyPalms
(Post 11224027)
Ollie. They are 2 different orders for A321xlr's.
I've also heard that they are different engine types. JQ CFM and QF P&W Gotcha, thanks |
Wasn't the original 744 flight canned because even the premium class pax found it to be too exhausting?
|
Hey Andrasz,
Fuel burn goes almost exponential for ultra long haul ops. As I recall it, the extra burn per ton for B744 SYD-DFW was about 650Kg/ton uplifted. That refers to fuel or payload coz fuel is really just house bricks until you burn it. Hence it is way more fuel efficient to make a stop at the half way point. Think about covering a tempo T/Z at DFW ex SYD, about 8 tons. One day the greenies will wake up to this and go nuts about ultra long haul. |
Originally Posted by mustafagander
(Post 11224089)
As I recall it, the extra burn per ton for B744 SYD-DFW was about 650Kg/ton uplifted.
|
Originally Posted by Buckshot
(Post 11223997)
12 A350 frames would be about 100ish Captains. Any speculation how senior these slots would likely go? ie don't hold out if your number isn't < 300
A321 commands could be enticing for senior WB FOs (or those not wanting to endure the dodgy seat back on the 73) or even those 65+ bidding back with an easier conversion compared to 73. |
With all the excitement nobody has mentioned anything about B scale for new joiners
|
Originally Posted by Buckshot
(Post 11223997)
12 A350 frames would be about 100ish Captains. Any speculation how senior these slots would likely go? ie don't hold out if your number isn't < 300
A321 commands could be enticing for senior WB FOs (or those not wanting to endure the dodgy seat back on the 73) or even those 65+ bidding back with an easier conversion compared to 73. |
Originally Posted by CCA
(Post 11223542)
QF royalty is likely boarding the plane in Perth so they can have a jolly.
Having QF staff depart from France was likely a bit risky Covid wise. Good to finally see Qantas order some new aircraft though, hope it translates into some movement for you all. |
Interestingly I was told recently that the A380 positions may not necessarily go to the most senior. (I'm not privy to lists anymore so can only go on what I'm told.)
Most senior 330 pilots want the 350 slots, 737 pilots want a 330 or 787 (depending upon lifestyle domestic vs international & Boeing familiarity), 787 mob happy to stay there, leaving some of the more senior mid-range 330 pilots (say number 40-80 on type) the opportunity to jag a 380 with a relatively comfortable conversion and more time at home than they get now.….. |
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11224133)
The numbers of over 65s who return to SH has always been small. The fact the 321 would be doing quite a bit of BoC with less opportunities for inflight rest and the usual busy domestic flying would not be that enticing for a long time long hauler. Coming back to multi sector days, aircraft swaps, quick turnarounds, battling weather, MELs, delays non stop is usually not the desire right before retirement. |
Originally Posted by TimmyTee
(Post 11223520)
Isn't it slightly ironic that an empty 1000 is flying to perth and not direct to Sydney (presuming it will head straight there after perth)?
|
I read a pollie claiming sunrise flights can only operate from Kingsford Smith, because the runway at the new Western airport is too short.
True? Mjb |
Originally Posted by mickjoebill
(Post 11225413)
I read a pollie claiming sunrise flights can only operate from Kingsford Smith, because the runway at the new Western airport is too short.
True? Mjb |
Runway 34L at SYD is 3962m. The A350-1000 still has the same MTOW even if most of it is kerosene. So if QF1 LHR direct can only use that runway and not one 262m shorter at Western SYD Qantas better do a rethink on safety margins. Hahaha...
|
Not sure how true it is, but there is a rumour going around that Airbus can’t certify the A350 centre tank modifications required for project sunrise. Could project sunrise become project sunset?
|
Originally Posted by Buckshot
(Post 11223997)
A321 commands could be enticing for senior WB FOs (or those not wanting to endure the dodgy seat back on the 73) or even those 65+ bidding back with an easier conversion compared to 73. WB FO’s who think they are waiting for a 321 CMD could be in for a rude shock if they haven’t read the SHEA. I’m unsure when the variation went through so perhaps it was all a bit of an unknown when this post was made. every 321 CMD and FO slot (apart from the management stooges and initial trainers) will be taken by a current 737 pilot. for everyone’s sake I hope the rumours around the centre tank are false, but it would be funny as to see Alan’s baby get flushed down the drain. I’m sure we’ll still get 350’s anyway, and I’m sure QF has negotiated significant penalties if Airbus can’t get the thing flying |
Originally Posted by davidclarke
(Post 11465445)
Not sure how true it is, but there is a rumour going around that Airbus can’t certify the A350 centre tank modifications required for project sunrise. Could project sunrise become project sunset?
|
Originally Posted by cloudsurfng
(Post 11465836)
WB FO’s who think they are waiting for a 321 CMD could be in for a rude shock if they haven’t read the SHEA. I’m unsure when the variation went through so perhaps it was all a bit of an unknown when this post was made.
every 321 CMD and FO slot (apart from the management stooges and initial trainers) will be taken by a current 737 pilot. for everyone’s sake I hope the rumours around the centre tank are false, but it would be funny as to see Alan’s baby get flushed down the drain. I’m sure we’ll still get 350’s anyway, and I’m sure QF has negotiated significant penalties if Airbus can’t get the thing flying Seems that over 65s will be 'allowed' on fleet since it's domestic. The regional configured jets will be additional to these and will do near Asia etc - meaning any over 65s will be automatically be given all the nice daylight domestic flying and the rest do all the BOC 2 crew home flights. |
Originally Posted by cloudsurfng
(Post 11465836)
WB FO’s who think they are waiting for a 321 CMD could be in for a rude shock if they haven’t read the SHEA. I’m unsure when the variation went through so perhaps it was all a bit of an unknown when this post was made.
every 321 CMD and FO slot (apart from the management stooges and initial trainers) will be taken by a current 737 pilot. for everyone’s sake I hope the rumours around the centre tank are false, but it would be funny as to see Alan’s baby get flushed down the drain. I’m sure we’ll still get 350’s anyway, and I’m sure QF has negotiated significant penalties if Airbus can’t get the thing flying |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:24. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.