|
Except that aviation in Australia is not 'thorough' it is 'particular'. |
Think the 73 was out on a quick squirt up to PN and back
|
Originally Posted by sid-star
(Post 11343008)
Any NAA has every right to expect any start-up operator entering the aviation system to submit an AOC application which complies 100 % with the Act / Rules / Regulations and be properly resourced, both financially and having experienced and competent senior persons to ensure all the mandatory regulations are met.
I leave it to you to determine whether we have that in Australia, or something....else.... |
Shazza's had a run down to "The Cattery" Avalon airport today (Saturday). See socials for the stats.
Happy landings:ok: |
Looks like the 3rd and 4th Aircraft are on the way home as we speak. Wont be long and the fleet will be bigger vs RexJet soon and they have not even started ops yet!
|
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
(Post 11345297)
Looks like the 3rd and 4th Aircraft are on the way home as we speak. Wont be long and the fleet will be bigger vs RexJet soon and they have not even started ops yet!
|
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
(Post 11345297)
Looks like the 3rd and 4th Aircraft are on the way home as we speak. Wont be long and the fleet will be bigger vs RexJet soon and they have not even started ops yet!
|
With UJK now at MCY there are 3 parked up
Must be getting close to starting up services |
Word is proving flight in the next 72 hours.
|
|
Both links appear to the lead to the bordermail site
|
Good Luck boys and girls :ok:
|
Originally Posted by Mr_App
(Post 11346281)
Word is proving flight in the next 72 hours.
|
They did Gladstone & Bundaberg in the last couple of days.
|
Reports proving flight next week. CASA coming back from Holidays early it seems.
|
CASA have been back since Tuesday 3 January.
|
Originally Posted by Deano969
(Post 11346245)
With UJK now at MCY there are 3 parked up
Must be getting close to starting up services Is this the same trend that has lots of people adding 'back' after return, i.e. 'return back' (which is grating I must admit). |
Originally Posted by AerialPerspective
(Post 11360790)
When did 'parked' start requiring 'up' on the end of it? This seems to be a recent phenomenon, for decades I've heard people saying their car is parked, the aeroplane is parked, but now it's parked 'up'.
Is this the same trend that has lots of people adding 'back' after return, i.e. 'return back' (which is grating I must admit). |
It's almost as if living languages change over time. Doth thou not agree? |
Originally Posted by AerialPerspective
(Post 11360790)
When did 'parked' start requiring 'up' on the end of it? This seems to be a recent phenomenon, for decades I've heard people saying their car is parked, the aeroplane is parked, but now it's parked 'up'.
Is this the same trend that has lots of people adding 'back' after return, i.e. 'return back' (which is grating I must admit). swap it “out” my favorite….anyways! |
Originally Posted by AerialPerspective
(Post 11360790)
When did 'parked' start requiring 'up' on the end of it? This seems to be a recent phenomenon, for decades I've heard people saying their car is parked, the aeroplane is parked, but now it's parked 'up'.
Is this the same trend that has lots of people adding 'back' after return, i.e. 'return back' (which is grating I must admit). So parked means parked i.e. parked at the gate, parked in your driveway (car) parked at the shopping centre etc Parked up means parked long term i.e. parked up at Alice Springs, to put a vehicle in a place where it can stay for some time Parked = short term Parked up = long term Deano |
Impordand
isdsowiqhqwew |
/drift continue
There’s a difference between languages evolving on one hand and increasing levels of illiteracy on the other. ‘Return back’ (like ‘revert back’) are just solecisms, pure and simple. ‘Should of’ (like ‘could of’) instead of ‘should have’ or ‘could have’ are just solecisms. ‘Your going to’ … ‘Just incase’… ‘I’m lead to believe’… All just solecisms. 2 + 2 will never equal 5, no matter how many innumerates say otherwise. /drift off |
Doth thou not agree? |
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie
(Post 11361107)
He doth, but Thou DOST.
|
On the same topic, why do most Australian airlines say ".....flight through to Sydney"? Surely it's the same context as "going to the shops". No one says "I'm going through to the shops"
|
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
(Post 11361103)
There’s a difference between languages evolving on one hand and increasing levels of illiteracy on the other. ‘Return back’ (like ‘revert back’) are just solecisms, pure and simple. ‘Should of’ (like ‘could of’) instead of ‘should have’ or ‘could have’ are just solecisms. ‘Your going to’ … ‘Just incase’… ‘I’m lead to believe’… All just solecisms.
Reports proving flight next week. |
Originally Posted by Maisk Rotum
(Post 11361259)
On the same topic, why do most Australian airlines say ".....flight through to Sydney"? Surely it's the same context as "going to the shops". No one says "I'm going through to the shops"
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.