PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   C130 down NE Cooma (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/629086-c130-down-ne-cooma.html)

OZBUSDRIVER 25th Jan 2020 05:29

That image looking forward along the line of impact is very worrying.

machtuk 25th Jan 2020 05:45

Can't imagine being part of the first responders to this just awful accident -( Those people would be traumatised am sure! Most of us should be grateful we don't get exposed to that level of tragedy.
RIP to the guys still on patrol fighting Mother Nature -(

Sir HC 25th Jan 2020 05:47

Can anyone tell me if the experience requirements to operate as a LAT or VLAT pilot are the same as a SEAT pilot, ie. Agricultural Rating, Fire Endorsement? Seeing that BAE-146 (or Avro) nearly buy the farm in the US this year made me think that the kind of low level experience that keeps you alive on a truly miserable and challenging day may be missing in favor of the multi-crew and time on type experience that the agencies require.

Condolences to the families, grieving a thousand miles away.

megan 25th Jan 2020 05:54


Just went over the A-DSB from https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N134CG
the most probable wing failure occurred at 1980 meters, thats quite
a fair distance above the ground.
Towards the end, there is a pitch change, that follows what appears to be
G force stresses on the wings.
More evidence that points directly at a Wing Failure as being the cause
of the accident.
Throw in the dubious history of this aircraft and it appears to have
been an accident going to happen.
Given the post that J3 was replying to I can't agree that it was over the top Porter, but that's just me.

dak_095 25th Jan 2020 06:16

Thats because its in an active fire area - where access is controlled to stop aimless rubber neckers. Its also an official accident site on private property. People cant visit and make silly statements about what why and how... Just the professionals.....

RickNRoll 25th Jan 2020 06:18

Nevermind.

onetrack 25th Jan 2020 06:28

Here's better quality drone footage supplied by NSW Police to the ABC News, than the mobile phone news images supplied by Numpty Aussie.
All photos, and the video, are enlargeable.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-01-...fires/11900654

logansi 25th Jan 2020 06:40

From the photos, 1 thing we can say is that the accident occurred at a relatively low angle, definitely didn't plummet into the ground.

Lookleft 25th Jan 2020 06:45

The footage makes all the speculation about in-flight breakup and ADS-B data redundant. It reminds me of the images from the Erebus debris field.

DaveReidUK 25th Jan 2020 07:02


Originally Posted by SCPL_1988 (Post 10670851)
In this accident, the A-DSB record shows what appears to be severe turbulence stresses followed by what appears to be a break up or a crash.

Out of interest, which of the 11 ADS-B plots covering the last 5 minutes of the flight (i.e. at about 30 second intervals, on average) do you believe shows "severe turbulence" ?

catseye 25th Jan 2020 07:08

lookleft agreed but can't find enough engines. Two are obvious.

Kiwiconehead 25th Jan 2020 08:06


Originally Posted by logansi (Post 10670941)
From the photos, 1 thing we can say is that the accident occurred at a relatively low angle, definitely didn't plummet into the ground.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....fdd4d6f2af.jpg

When I first had the news pop up on my phone I pictured that video from 2002 - but now I'm picturing that RJ-85 video from last year.

It's hard to tell from that picture how much of a slope up there is at the site - some pictures make it look quite steep. How does the terrain height at the impact site compare to where they dropped?

rattman 25th Jan 2020 08:55

Is the gofundme anyone from here or able to shed light on it if its legit

https://www.gofundme.com/f/coulson-t...-memorial-fund

terminus mos 25th Jan 2020 09:03

It shows just how fine the tolerances are between a "close call" and an accident with multiple fatalities.

YeahNahYeah 25th Jan 2020 09:45


Originally Posted by Kiwiconehead (Post 10671005)
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....fdd4d6f2af.jpg

When I first had the news pop up on my phone I pictured that video from 2002 - but now I'm picturing that RJ-85 video from last year.

It's hard to tell from that picture how much of a slope up there is at the site - some pictures make it look quite steep. How does the terrain height at the impact site compare to where they dropped?

If you can determine the crash location, you might be able to find the topographic map here: https://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/etopo.html

Xeptu 25th Jan 2020 11:20

The cause of the crash may never be known, simply because we have no data and probably never will, for those forces, ash and debris directly above a fire storm. One can only begin to imagine. The resultant impact is likely to be one of four things, structural failure, down/back draught, CFIT, Stall. These bushfires are unprecedented and all those putting themselves in harms way fighting them are very brave people indeed.

Jim Peters 25th Jan 2020 13:08

A tragic site / sight. My condolences to all suffering a loss in this accident.

I wonder what investigations have been done on the configuration and intensity of the turbulence induced by a large fire. and the hazard associated with the extreme temperatures, however transient they may be, as well as the sudden major changes in air density and composition.. How ,much oxygen is around to maintain engine power? In a large fire, these hazards may not be transient. I also wonder whether G meters and G limits are used to help limit aerodynamic loading.

I am not about to make any predictions re the outcome of any investigation.,

So whatever the causes and contributing causes happen to be undoubtedly there will be a large number of factors involving the aircraft, pilots, environment, maintenance in a very complex interaction -. There will be many "layers of cheese" in which the "holes have lined up" and hopefully, a useful, complex lesson of their interaction will emerge so that this kind of accident is not repeated.. .

flighthappens 25th Jan 2020 14:39


Originally Posted by SCPL_1988 (Post 10670851)
agread, As information comes out, it changes the most probable cause.

Which is why everyone was saying wait, rather than speculate; it eliminates unnecessary fear mongering, stress to people related to the incident, and incorrect attribution of the reasons for the accident.


Originally Posted by SCPL_1988 (Post 10670851)
At first there was just ADSB which is disturbing and so far
only a few have commented on in flight stresses.

in flight stress may, or may not be relevant. But at the moment no one knows.


Originally Posted by SCPL_1988 (Post 10670851)
In this accident, the A-DSB record shows
what appears to be severe turbulence stresses followed by what appears to be a break up or a crash.

I’d love for you to validate your claims. Now that more evidence is out (imagery) it appears in further on posts you are changing your tune. Will you apologise if your original theory is incorrect?





AAKEE 25th Jan 2020 14:46

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....621334cd56.png
dronephoto
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....ec94b8662e.jpg
Crash location

I Think this is the position. Some 1.5 km from last ADS-B.

DaveReidUK 25th Jan 2020 16:20


Originally Posted by AAKEE (Post 10671301)
I think this is the position. Some 1.5 km from last ADS-B.

Last ADS-B per FlightAware was slightly further north than shown: S 35°59'46" E 149°22'12"


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:42.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.