Originally Posted by donkey767
(Post 10517638)
On another note... anyone on here have any info why MEL is the only airport in Aus that seems to change their ATIS every 5-10min most days? |
Hey, come on guys this is Australia. You should be used to it by now. If you want a real chuckle ask for the Flow Controllers phone number ( they will give it to you if you say it is either that or an ASIR) and find out how they really make decisions. On the other hand you might not want to because its very, very sad. And they really, really do think they are worlds best practice! And its never, ever going to get any better. Pathetic. |
Its so funny, go to the Europe, NA or even asia and you can see they can accomodate far more traffic with usually worse weather conditions
|
Originally Posted by GreenGhost39
(Post 10517409)
10.3.1 Selection of Runway in Use |
Missy , you’ve hit the nail on the head but for all the wrong reasons. In Australia ATC rules can cost operators millions, trash the travel plans of tens of thousands of customers and drive operating crew slowly mad and the response is a shrug of the shoulders. And no sense of irony or absurdity. I’m glad I’m at the tail end of my career. Lord only knows how the systems going to look in 20 years time. |
Originally Posted by George Glass
(Post 10517770)
Missy , you’ve hit the nail on the head but for all the wrong reasons. In Australia ATC rules can cost operators millions, trash the travel plans of tens of thousands of customers and drive operating crew slowly mad and the response is a shrug of the shoulders. And no sense of irony or absurdity. I’m glad I’m at the tail end of my career. Lord only knows how the systems going to look in 20 years time. |
Originally Posted by VH-VIN
(Post 10517895)
Same is happing in NZ, I don't know how you airline guys keep sane!!! I suppose you just do what you have to and try not to think of madness of it all. I am sure in other 20 years it will come right and common sense will prevail but not for a while by the looks of it!!!
|
Originally Posted by ManaAdaSystem
(Post 10517168)
What’s going on? Canselling MEL and CBR because it may get windy? 17 kts is too much? Weird way of doing things. I was flying for long gone Ansett way back(it is actually nearly 19 years, my god, time flies), still remember some of the weird rules they had down under(hated the rules, loved the country). To much influence from their "parents", the brits I must clearly say. Not good, but hey, thats what they know. Aviation got overregulated over the past(nearly) 2 decades, it did not became better(of course my opinion, as always, but that is what I see in direct comparison). Long time that I am back to Europe and as well here some aviation authorities just do not get it right - take some Italian airports as an example(other nations are not much better, but not to make this post to long lets go with (in)famous ENAC and some of it''s multiple stupid decissions) - there is for instance Treviso(LIPH) that can only accept a maximum of 15 kts x-wind(single runway outfit with usual landing on ILS07 and take off 25. No hills, mountains that affect the runway really. It is just like this. Are italian pilots generally bad? Nope. But their authority is not one of the most effective ones(let's take it like this to say it in a nice way). Treviso is not the only airport that has not so clever rules like that. We could go on with airports in France, their attitude towards the #1 aviation language, ENGLISH, plus some other rules, UK, SPAIN.... Over the years I learned just to take a deep breath when they come up with something "new" to make my life easy and SAFE(the new magic word that makes everything right), usually it just causes delay. Good for a controller, he goes home anyway. Not so good for us pilots, we are stuck where we usually are, in the flightdeck till time runs out and it becomes game over. Normally they alway manage it that we just make it in time, still, the days become long due to "effective" rules. Just take this "sticking with filed flightlevel" bs that they are pulling here in Europe now. Like that makes any sense in a summer full of bad thunderstorms and the NEED for an effective ATC instead of one that is pulling out (idiotic) rules out of their hat. But that is "modern" aviation nowadays. To make you fell better - it will just go worse. Overregulation tends to have that effect. |
Originally Posted by shortshortz
(Post 10517938)
NZ isn't really even close. There was a 288 minute COBT delay yesterday for some guys into YSSY and you would still then receive airborne delays. YMML average delay would be 5 minutes weekdays and with one RWY you'd be happy with only a 10min delay, taking off from YMLT and getting a 30 minute delay isn't abnormal. NZ pilots jump up and down if they're slowed down by a minute or two.
|
Originally Posted by George Glass
(Post 10517770)
Missy , you’ve hit the nail on the head but for all the wrong reasons. In Australia ATC rules can cost operators millions, trash the travel plans of tens of thousands of customers and drive operating crew slowly mad and the response is a shrug of the shoulders. And no sense of irony or absurdity. I’m glad I’m at the tail end of my career. Lord only knows how the systems going to look in 20 years time. |
Originally Posted by sunnySA
(Post 10518022)
George, what are these particular or peculiar Australian ATC rules that you are referring to? Can you give the forum some specific examples ?
|
Curious. If RWY25 had high speed taxiways would this increase the hourly movements? The investment would be warranted no?
|
Sunny, see GreenGhost39’s post. The rule that causes the grief at Sydney is the forecast maximum crosswind on 16/34. ATC goes to single runway ops. when the crosswind is nowhere near aircraft operating limits. In Melbourne a 21 knot southerly with a 6 knot tailwind on 27 will mean 45 minutes COBT delay plus airborne holding for a CBR-MEL flight. Given the magnitude of the mayhem these rules cause on a routine basis isn’t it possible that the rules are a horses ar#e? Maybe its just me. |
Originally Posted by shortshortz
(Post 10517938)
NZ isn't really even close. There was a 288 minute COBT delay yesterday for some guys into YSSY and you would still then receive airborne delays.
I wonder what the airlines would prefer - having their flight depart on time and possibly get 90-120 minutes of airborne holding with the possibility of a diversion, or a 3 hour COBT delay still with 30 plus minutes airborne holding. The two hours of airborne holding would result in less of a delay to that aircraft for the airline, but obviously at the cost of several Tonnes of fuel and the increased risk of a diversion. |
Colonel, the fact that you can quote numbers like that without the slightest hint of irony says it all. Is there anywhere else on the planet where this could be considered normal? Or is it really the massive snafu it appears to be? |
Originally Posted by George Glass
(Post 10518056)
Sunny, see GreenGhost39’s post. The rule that causes the grief at Sydney is the forecast maximum crosswind on 16/34. ATC goes to single runway ops. when the crosswind is nowhere near aircraft operating limits. In Melbourne a 21 knot southerly with a 6 knot tailwind on 27 will mean 45 minutes COBT delay plus airborne holding for a CBR-MEL flight. Given the magnitude of the mayhem these rules cause on a routine basis isn’t it possible that the rules are a horses ar#e? Maybe its just me. One thing that has changed in the last 20-25 years is the increased use of wind analysers that accurately display the instantaneous, mean (2 minute average) and peak winds. Wind back 20 years, single anemometer and wind socks, there is a LOT more data available to the TWR ATCs. Perhaps there needs to be more education around the wording "including gusts" and how this relates to the instantaneous, mean and peak winds, which winds are used for which purpose. For information, the RWY 34L anemometer is owned (and maintained) by the BoM and is the one recorded on the METAR and SPECI. There will often be major differences between this wind and the ATIS wind (for obvious reasons). Also, COBT doesn't mean no holding, it should mean significantly less holding than a "free for all", the current rules around COBT do need changing and ACDM should result in better outcomes. Recent feedback provided by Industry to Airservices has resulted in an adjustment to have more aircraft airborne to "keep pressure on the system" to maximise throughput but always having aircraft in the pipeline. |
Sunny, is there any chance that anybody in ATC is ever going to admit that the system is broken? It’s blindingly obvious to everybody at the operational level and to anybody who travels regularly up and down the east coast. It’s broken. It doesn’t work. It fails in its primary mission of moving people from point A to B. It is at its absolute limit now and unless something radical is done soon its all downhill from here. |
Originally Posted by George Glass
(Post 10518080)
Sunny, is there any chance that anybody in ATC is ever going to admit that the system is broken? It’s blindingly obvious to everybody at the operational level and to anybody who travels regularly up and down the east coast. It’s broken. It doesn’t work. It fails in its primary mission of moving people from point A to B. It is at its absolute limit now and unless something radical is done soon its all downhill from here. |
Originally Posted by George Glass
(Post 10518065)
Colonel, the fact that you can quote numbers like that without the slightest hint of irony says it all. Is there anywhere else on the planet where this could be considered normal? Or is it really the massive snafu it appears to be? So yes, it is a massive snafu & an embarassment to those of us who ply the aviation trade outside Australia. |
And for a further update... ATIS at 18:00 Sunday night has the wind as 250/10 and still only using one Runway. The first NOTAM for YSSY says that aircraft can expect airborne holding of 40-60 minutes. Something is significantly broken with the way things are done in this country.... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:51. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.