Cobham Aviation
For those interested, Cobhams are advertising on the AFAP webpage for Dash8 crew, B717 First Officers and CL604 crew. |
Rumors that they were interviewing last month?. |
Go for it boys and girls! It’s a great way to get some jet time.
|
Rumors that they were interviewing last month?. |
Old news. The "rumour" is that they have been interviewing solidly for several months, I hope they are not struggling to find applicants. With lines like:
"Cobham is continuously seeking suitably qualified pilots to join our team as First Officers in an environment where career and lifestyle combine" and "Opportunities to progress to command within relatively short timeframes" Who could resist? (My bolding etc) |
The "rumour" is that they have been interviewing solidly for several months] |
Surveillance and AMSA are almost continuously recruiting.... nothing new there. |
I find it funny that the Cobham freight/146 operation hardly ever advertise and seem to have no trouble with retention.
Makes you wonder why the SAR and Coastwatch operation seem to be a revolving door. |
Its it possible to move within the operations or is recruitment handled externally?
|
Originally Posted by pilotchute
(Post 10286805)
I find it funny that the Cobham freight/146 operation hardly ever advertise and seem to have no trouble with retention.
Makes you wonder why the SAR and Coastwatch operation seem to be a revolving door. |
I’m told the 717 turnover is high. |
Looking at job recruitment adds for truck drivers and seamen I’m seeing companies offering bases of choice , multiply packages , offering big money for working max hours to reduced rosters / trips to barely working options . Companies willing to tailor individual packages to suit ? .
Airlines so so far behind , don’t care except drive the salary down at all costs . |
Originally Posted by Toruk Macto
(Post 10286989)
Airlines so so far behind , don’t care except drive the salary down at all costs .
If a domestic marine business tried that on it will end with WWIII with the CFMEU and most likely the Labor Party. When you've got that kind of fire power behind you can get any kind of rostering you want. |
Blitz'
It's a MASSIVE turnover EVERYWHERE mate, Australia; Pacific; USA; Asia; Japan; M.E.; Africa; Europe... f'gen everywhere cuz! Pilots are moving all over the globe in search of better deals and as you see, the "cat-fish"/bottom dwellers of the industry are short of crew! I haven't ever seen such desperation in crew-hunting by airlines in Australia (though they hide it for of loss of face), in my 3 decade career BECAUSE of what Toruk mentions above - Airlines so so far behind , don’t care except drive the salary down at all costs. The stupidity of Australian Airlines (Int/Domestic & Regional) is, that they think they are soooo special and that they have sooo much to offer. Well it's time to wake up and smell the coffee because no one now, globally is out there to help crew your staff shortages AND now you are meant to have "Fatigue Management Systems" etc you have to deal with-in constraints finally. OUCH! Long time overdue! Qantaslink searching in Africa? LOL Emirates/Turkish/Qatar dried up that pool of experienced ones in Africa etc years ago, before all the USA majors started huge recruitment's to cover for their massive number of retirements (huge evac from M.E.). You're in a global market of labour resourcing now kids (Airline CEO's) because you failed to invest in your future streams! Reap what you sow because it's going to cost you more now! The ball is not in your court finally, so show me the money... and we will fix your parked aircraft against the fence, with the return of many & varied highly experienced Aussie operators from overseas to help clear the mire of the current "divide & conquer" managerial (I use that term VERY losely) expertise (that too) who currently see themselves fit to administer aviation companies. Can I just, by the way - Accountants are accountants... lawyers are lawyers... stay in your qualified jobs and stop transferring to Industries you know nothing about, such as the very unique Aviation Industry! If you think otherwise, you obviously have no clue or any idea of what happened in the past numerous times from those of your ilk. |
What makes it even more ridiculous is when an airline screaming for crew will still knock back candidates for lack of twin or or multi crew time.
|
At the end of the day Airlines are always going to be able to open the floodgates to the world to come and work here with zero resistance from the government. |
Friend of mine working in oil industry as captain on supply ship , he lives on island of coast of Australia . His company gives him month on month off and fly’s him to where ship is , Qantas club , confirmed tickets , he knows when he will be working for next 12 months . At the time I’m flying for company in oil industry and my roster good for a week and after that it’s in lap of operational God’s , 2 weeks notice due base closures and get yourself there if you want a job . Place littered with divorced dads , Blokes using alcohol to self medicate , if you don’t like it leave was only option ( which I did ) . Respect won’t be given it has to be earnt , conditions won’t improve by therself . Oil prices on way up ? There is a pilot shortage ! |
Get out of the aviation industry into Oil and Gas if you can, it’s a hard nut to crack but it’s possible as I did it a few years ago. |
You need to be more specific as there are four operations. Regional, Airline, Surveillance as Coastwatch and the SAR work. All different AOCs. |
Qantas have identified the No 1 threat to their business going forward is lack of pilots . For companies like Cobham and regeniols in general it must make sense to have a stable workforce ? Not just pay rates but lifestyle options of commuting contracts , part time or condensed rosters could solve turnover rates ? Chinese carriers will dictate pay rates going forward but Australian lifestyle is attractive if rosters stable and lifestyle ok ? |
I’ve thrown my hat in the ring for a few part time jobs in Darwin, feedback that I’ve received is that they are only interested in full timers as they recon it would be to difficult to intergrate a part time pilot into their CAR 217?? I’m not convinced that this is really a valid reason particularly if the part timers have substantial experience compounded by the fact that some operators are dangling the FIFO carrot.
|
The reason they don't want part time is because they couldn't plan anything to save themselves.
I know a couple of Southern operators who hire part timers and it works well for them. What there is a shortage of is type rated ready go kids willing to do anything for little money. |
Cobham have been interviewing for a few months, I have friends that have done interview with them and friends that have applied and haven't heard back, only difference is mates that got an interview had over 1000 hrs twin time, they are being very picky and wanting guy/girls with twin time.
|
Type rated ready to go kids with no experience on type willing to do anything for little money? Accidents generally aren't good PR spins for airlines.
|
Isn't that the beauty of subcontractors though? All that nasty stuff like accidents can be kept at arms length :eek:
|
Heard rumours/whispers of the Ejet making a return to regional services. Can anyone confirm?
|
Funny how simply naming something "a group" manages to blind side so many folk.
If you're mildly interested in flying for "Cobham" as a pilot, better get your head around the fact that there are FOUR operations called Cobham. Four tribes if you like, each with their own.. Chief pilot Training department Aircraft type Culture Mission Career path Terms and conditions. Etc. And: It is harder for a "cobham" pilot to 'transfer' to another 'business unit' than it is for a needle to pass through the eye of a camel.... or whatever. For any indignant "a company oughta" posters.... not my circus, not my monkeys... I agree it does not make sense.... but that's their way and they ain't changing for no pilot! |
While I agree with most of your points, how is it harder for a Cobham pilot to move between groups?
|
Just to make it clear Cobham has 4 distinct business units (possibly three). Each one is operated as a separate business. Seperate HR and management. I think SAR and Coastwatch may be under the one banner. Moving between units is like moving to another company. It would be like going from Qlink to Jetstar. Full interview and all the associated nonsense.
|
I understand they have different groups under the same company, but I wouldn't agree with different interviews going between the different sections, some do defiantly but others seems to work quite well with each other and tend to take the pilot on merit and a phone call.
Sar and Special mission operate under the same Aoc. |
Moving between units is like moving to another company. |
People do move between the three BUs, but it’s not common (easy). |
Originally Posted by Notthisguy
(Post 10291269)
While I agree with most of your points, how is it harder for a Cobham pilot to move between groups?
Ask the Perth 146 FO who applied for a B717 FO vacancy on the East coast to be nearer his dying father. He had the seniority. There were no impediments like base or type freeze and he had solid line check sim check results and a clean history. His chief pilot told him he would recommend him for the transfer. The vacancy went to a new hire. When he enquired, the 717 people told him his application was not competitive. The only BU pilots that have "rights" to a vacancy in another BU are the pre-2005 BAe146 pilots that used to be employed by NJS BU. Mostly west coast 146 Captains that are no longer interested. The last transferee had a LOT of influence - the Chief of the B717 outfit took himself out of that role and into a line 146 captain role. Not many 'internal applicants' have that sort of pull. Prior to that, the last Surveillance to Airline internal transferees were maybe half a dozen D8 captains promised B717 FO spots by "Uday" upon Uday's appointment to GM AS. By my count, that is 6 applicants out of more than 100 vacancies. All of them had "pull" or positional power. Those that didn't have 'pull' found 'their' jobs filled by external applicants. Every other pilot that has transferred into the B717 outfit has had to compete directly with external applicants. That 'even footing' with external applicants is tilted against the BU to BU applicant whenever a chief pilot of one BU says to the other "we can't afford to lose a Captain/FO right now." And given Cobham's business model of pricing customer contracts based on the number of pilots nominally required to fulfil the contract, and then increasing profit margins later by keeping the base establishments at one or two pilots under that number, paying overtime, and restricting annual leave and LSL, and then pocketing the savings in sims/uniforms/etc, it is rare for a Cobham chief to say "we could afford to lose one!" Maybe you are an exceptional individual. By all means, give it a try. I simply think it is easier to get a better job working for nicer people, elsewhere! ;-) |
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
(Post 10291797)
Almost but not quite. I checked with two sources and they kept LSL and sick leave, employee number etc. I know of people from three BUs that are now in other BUs but it is harder than it could be. Very nice of them. But first you have to win the lottery. |
it is rare for a Cobham chief to say "we could afford to lose one!" P.S. I’m told the FO you mention ITCZ will never get the opportunity to be near his (now late) parents. |
A LOT of uninformed commentary in all of this supposition. Take it from someone who actually KNOWS AND DEALS with the facts with ALL of this, and is involved at the very highest level........... |
A LOT of uninformed commentary in all of this supposition Wouldn't expect anything less from the prune, would ya? |
A LOT of uninformed commentary in all of this supposition. and is involved at the very highest level........... |
......................and to address the loss of pilots by maybe, just maybe, trying to look after them. yeah.....nah
|
Trevor is 100% correct. Looking after the pilots they have and improving morale will cost Cobham nothing and possibly save them alot of money
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:33. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.