PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   Emergency Exits (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/604291-emergency-exits.html)

Dangly Bits 17th Jan 2018 00:13

Emergency Exits
 
So if Virgin are now charging extra for an emergency exit seat, and no one buys one for the flight, who operates the emergency exit in the event of an accident? I noticed on a recent flight with empty seats that when a gentleman moved to an empty exit row after take-off, he was politely asked to pay for the upgrade or get out! He moved out of the completely vacant exit row.

Ken Borough 17th Jan 2018 00:26


when a gentleman moved to an empty exit row after take-off, he was politely asked to pay for the upgrade or get out!
Charming! Is this any way to treat a 'guest'? And I bet it'll be quite a while before the said gentleman ventures onto a VA aircraft again.

andmiz 17th Jan 2018 00:36

Exit rows don't have to be occupied. The regulations only cover the type of person that must sit in them, if they are occupied.

To answer your question: Who operates the exit....? The first person to get to it!

airtags 17th Jan 2018 02:07

Emergency exits where operated by pax (eg 738's o'wing etc) do require exit row to be occupied - refer Operator manual
AT

PoppaJo 17th Jan 2018 03:39

Few years back we didn’t have enough pax onboard for the exits (A320). Return was full so they asked some ground staff to go along to fill the seats to avoid cancellation.

missy 17th Jan 2018 03:42


Originally Posted by andmiz (Post 10021977)
The first person to get to it!

So rather than have someone who has been briefed on the operation of the emergency exit the airline would prefer someone who hasn't been briefed.
Interesting.

Cleared Visual 17th Jan 2018 04:30


Originally Posted by Ken Borough (Post 10021969)
Charming! Is this any way to treat a 'guest'? And I bet it'll be quite a while before the said gentleman ventures onto a VA aircraft again.

And sadly not surprising. On a VA flight over the Christmas holidays an elderly passenger seated behind me started to become ill and requested a blanket - apparently Virgin are "trialling" having customers pay for blankets, and on this occasion they had sold out. The apologetic cabin crew instead said they would turn up the temperature in the cabin by a few degrees (no fault on theirs, at least they tried to assist) which helped the poor lady, but made for a rather uncomfortable flight for many of the rest of us... I was already annoyed at this lack of regard for passenger health and comfort, but reading about the exit row charges and potential safety implications, I too will think twice about booking with VA again any time soon.

bsmasher 17th Jan 2018 05:17

Qlink Dash 8 last week. They asked for volunteers to fill in the last seat in the exit row. ... I got a bit more legroom (-:

atakacs 17th Jan 2018 05:30


Originally Posted by PoppaJo (Post 10022057)
Few years back we didn’t have enough pax onboard for the exits (A320). Return was full so they asked some ground staff to go along to fill the seats to avoid cancellation.

Hmm you had less than 4 able adults on the outbound leg? Seems quite the edge case...

And what happened to said ground crew on the fully booked return leg?

maggot 17th Jan 2018 07:16


Originally Posted by atakacs (Post 10022094)
Hmm you had less than 4 able adults on the outbound leg? Seems quite the edge case...

And what happened to said ground crew on the fully booked return leg?

Iirc we needed 2 at each overwing IE. 8 per flight on the 738. It's been a while tho

Capn Bloggs 17th Jan 2018 07:55


Originally Posted by Poppa
Few years back we didn’t have enough pax onboard for the exits (A320).

I'll call "dodgy" on that too, Atakacs!

We did have a rule that below XX pax, there was no requirement for pax in Exit rows. Now, if there are any pax on board, the exit rows get filled in order. If you don't have the number of pax to fill all the exit row seats, we certainly don't cancel the flight!

Poppa, come on, out with the True News!! :=

turbantime 17th Jan 2018 09:04

If under a certain number of pax, exit rows do not need to be filled in line with CASA requirements.

Only ABP’s may be seated in the exit row and must be briefed so you can’t just have anyone moving in there without a briefing (CASA requirement).

On top of that, these are sold as extra revenue seats (economy x). Letting just anyone sit there would be akin to letting anyone into J class just because the seat/row was free.

Just to be clear, if no one has purchased exit row seats and number of pax now requires exit row to be filled, they will be filled by pax. Ground crew will in this case issue seat changes to meet the requirements.

sunnybunny 17th Jan 2018 09:16

So... If the numbers required an exit seat being filled and if a Non ABP bought the exit seat would they be told to move and the seat given to an ABP?

turbantime 17th Jan 2018 09:27

Correct, you have to be an ABP to be seated in overwing exit row. Ground crew will assess in the first instance and then cabin crew also have power to move non-ABP out. Affected pax will then be refunded the amount paid for said row. Mind you, when you select exit row online, system makes you check a box ensuring you know the requirements to be seated in exit row.

AerocatS2A 17th Jan 2018 10:20

I have been offered an exit seat by Virgin gate staff when it became apparent they didn't have enough.

PoppaJo 17th Jan 2018 11:03


Originally Posted by Capn Bloggs (Post 10022164)
I'll call "dodgy" on that too, Atakacs!

We did have a rule that below XX pax, there was no requirement for pax in Exit rows. Now, if there are any pax on board, the exit rows get filled in order. If you don't have the number of pax to fill all the exit row seats, we certainly don't cancel the flight!

Poppa, come on, out with the True News!! :=

Unfortunately was the case. My previous employer was under the close watch of the regulator at one stage, who at one point was given a over and above set of rules to follow in order to operate.

wheels_down 17th Jan 2018 11:11

I assume you are referring to the Tiger grounding and the million restrictions CASA slapped on them in order to operate right after.. I assume these were all lifted so would be a one off

Chris2303 17th Jan 2018 12:06


Originally Posted by turbantime (Post 10022243)
Correct, you have to be an ABP to be seated in overwing exit row. Ground crew will assess in the first instance and then cabin crew also have power to move non-ABP out. Affected pax will then be refunded the amount paid for said row. Mind you, when you select exit row online, system makes you check a box ensuring you know the requirements to be seated in exit row.

QF don't refund EROW charges unless ineligible pax call at least 24 hours prior departure

atakacs 17th Jan 2018 12:58

Fwiw I remember flying a pretty empty AirBerlin 321 with passengers only at the extreme ends of the cabin. The emergency rows all remained empty.
When I enquired to cabin crew about this they explained it was for weight and balance.

Capn Bloggs 17th Jan 2018 13:32


Fwiw I remember flying a pretty empty AirBerlin 321 with passengers only at the extreme ends of the cabin. The emergency rows all remained empty.
There should be some commonsense applied. If there's only twenty pax on board with at least 3 FAs, why on earth do all the overwing exit seats have to be full of ABPs?

They could all get out of one of the main doors in a few seconds, without needing to use the OWs.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:52.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.