PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   Fatigue (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/576682-fatigue.html)

megan 26th Mar 2016 03:51

Fatigue
 
All will be more than well aware of the debate about fatigue issues in the Middle East carriers as a result of the accident in Russia.

What are the rostering practices of Australian airlines like? Fatigue an issue? Problems associated should you call sick due fatigue?

Just SLF interest. Thanks in advance.

CurtainTwitcher 26th Mar 2016 04:36

See the thread FRMS Battlelines on this topic...

neville_nobody 26th Mar 2016 05:46

It isn't as big a problem as overseas primarily because:

-Successful NIMBY lobbies putting curfews on airports everywhere:D
-Domestically you will fly anywhere in less than 5 hours and ultimately passengers aren't interested in arriving somewhere at 0230. Most international flights by Australian Airlines have 3+ crew on board, basically due to the tyranny of distance.
-Union input to EBA's & work rules
- Our flight and duty regulations are not as generous as some overseas jurisdictions
- Middle Eastern Airlines also use 'Augmented Flight Time' which you can't do as an Australian airline.

On saying that I don't believe 900+ hours a year short haul is sustainable rostering over a long period of time either even with all the above considered.

Icarus2001 26th Mar 2016 06:42


Domestically you will fly anywhere in less than 5 hours
Which means some dubious out and back flights.

lostflyer 28th Mar 2016 00:12

What about the Australian owned Airlines based in NZ running under the weak NZCAA rules which basically allow the Company to set the Fatique Rule limits.

The Bullwinkle 28th Mar 2016 00:24

Or the dubious practice of rostering 12 hour duty days, flying 3 sectors with a total of only 5 hours of flight time, but padded out by having 3 hours of sitting around airports between each sector, with no acceptable crew rest areas.

neville_nobody 28th Mar 2016 02:15

Whilst not ideal those circumstances are not the same as flying to all points of the compass at any hour day or night whilst still jet lagged.

The Bullwinkle 28th Mar 2016 03:27

Or after early starts 4 days in a row, disrupting the circadian rhythm by switching to a late start for the next day and flying 4 sectors in 11 and a half hours with the final sector flying into a CTAF late at night.

framer 28th Mar 2016 06:53

The rules for truck drivers in NZ state that they must have 30 mins rest every 5 1/2 hours.
In Australia for the heavy solo truck drivers I think it is 30 mins every 9 hours.
Both have maximum hours of duty ( paperwork/ loading / driving etc) that are the same or less than narrow body regional pilots.
Pilots are regularly doing shifts over 10 hours with no break at unsociable hours day in day out. There is certainly potential here for trouble if the pilots are reluctant to put their hand up and say they are fatigued. The system won't catch it because it is all legal so the sole responsibility to call it rests with the individual. Sound like a good plan?
In my mind it is a regulation issue. The Airlines will always see the limits as a target so the limits must be sensible.

Metro man 28th Mar 2016 10:11

Didn't a chief pilot make a comment along the lines of "toughen up princesses" a while ago ?

Ned Stark 28th Mar 2016 19:01


Originally Posted by megan (Post 9323321)
All will be more than well aware of the debate about fatigue issues in the Middle East carriers as a result of the accident in Russia.

What are the rostering practices of Australian airlines like? Fatigue an issue? Problems associated should you call sick due fatigue?

Just SLF interest. Thanks in advance.

The way these questions are posed make it sound very much like a reporter getting info for a story.

ALAEA Fed Sec 28th Mar 2016 22:30

Just out of curiosity guys. Would you be happy if the LAMEs on your aircraft had worked 44 hours straight changing an engine without a rest break?

V-Jet 29th Mar 2016 00:11

1) Doesn't matter what we think - I'm sure Alan would think that perfectly acceptable, a fine example of 'work/life balance' (I think that's the term these days).
2) Can't be the case anyway - everyone knows aircraft fix themselves.....

megan 29th Mar 2016 01:12


The way these questions are posed make it sound very much like a reporter getting info for a story
Nope, just a very, very old ex pro aviator who plied his trade outside of airlines.

Ollie Onion 29th Mar 2016 02:01

Airlines in this part of the world do not take fatigue seriously, just look at the way Jetstar has appealed the courts ruling over providing meal and rest breaks in New Zealand. The claim was filed over 6 years ago and despite every court in the land ordering Jetstar to provide the legislated breaks in a days duty they still aren't! We have 3 sector trans tasman, 11.5 hour duties, All with minimum turns, you often don't have time to leave the flight deck for anything other than the walk around.

Take my last roster over 5 days:

1 - 13:30 - 22:30
2 - 13:30 - 22:30
3 - 13:30 - 18:30
4 - 05:30 - 12:45
5 - 19:15 - 05:30

How the hell you are meant to be well rested for that I don't know, I filed a report and the response was that the 'computer said this is not a fatiguing duty'?

Blitzkrieger 29th Mar 2016 03:01


Just out of curiosity guys. Would you be happy if the LAMEs on your aircraft had worked 44 hours straight changing an engine without a rest break?
Fed Sec, short answer, no.

Ollie Onion 29th Mar 2016 03:15

We run a ceraion of FAID, problem being if you call fatigued then you have to fill in a fatigue checklist and the company runs your roster thrpugh FAID. Ypu then get told that the duty is not fatiguing and you lose a days pay! So now I just call in sickas it is mot worth the hassle, so I guess the companies FMRS is working to reduce fatigue reports.

Bort Simpson 30th Mar 2016 07:18

FRMS reponsibilities
 
[... I filed a report and the response was that the 'computer said this is not a fatiguing duty'?[/QUOTE]

Mr Onion, what you have been told obviously shouldn't have been said because:
  1. A computer cannot actually know how you feel (does it know if the neighbour's dog barked all night and kept you awake?)
  2. According to CASA's FRMS Handbook, using the computer fatigue monitoring tool to tell people they are not fatigued is a no no. It is only there for a NO-GO decision, not for a "you are OK to go" decision.
Your path of action:
Your organisation must either have a FRMS SAG or have a standing order of FRMS within the existing SAG (Safety Action Group). You can raise your issue (and the inappropriateness of the company response) through your crew representatives in the SAG.
Alternatively or additionally, you can respond to fatigue and safety reports and notify them that you are not satisfied with the outcome due to reasons XYZ etc.


I hope that helps.


Look up the FRMS Handbook, its online.


Bortman

Blitzkrieger 31st Mar 2016 08:29

Bortman,

What you say would be true in any normal world, but...

If there was a robust, truly safety driven safety system in place, that paid the slightest bit of attention to the concerns of the staff, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

Your employer has no regard for fatigue management while they continue to bear no legal responsibility for what happens on your watch. You are responsible for your mistakes, and management make it untenable for you to avoid those mistakes by discharging your duty not to fly fatigued; the perfect crime.

ALAEA Fed Sec 1st Apr 2016 20:50

The major airlines in Australia couldn't give a flying crap about safety. Lodge as many reports as you like, they will hide them with CASAs tacit approval. If you talk about fatigue, Qantas recently directed 8 Engineers to work 44 hours straight without a rest break. No this is not an April fools joke it was 44 hours straight on an engine change.


We reported it, they wrote back to tell me that they would not carry out an investigation.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:00.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.