Originally Posted by Kenny
(Post 11332387)
For anyone that’s used to the ineptitude of Australian Pilot’s Unions, ALPA is an altogether very different animal. If they choose to make the E3 hill one worth fighting on, they’ll be able to bring an absurd amount of political pressure to bear.
|
Originally Posted by All hat and no cows
(Post 11332419)
Of course under Trump, your money was worth a lot more, and your 401K was worth a lot more,we weren’t on the verge of WW3 but yes couldn’t agree more there are stupid people everywhere.
|
J
Originally Posted by DropYourSocks
(Post 11331274)
Frontier is now offering a $35k signing bonus, predicated on a 3 year non-prorated return of service. I believe it's the first US major to offer a signing bonus.
Interesting times... |
Originally Posted by Climb150
(Post 11332510)
I just read ALPA's press release. US airlines have seen the biggest pay rises in history and even Frontier is now paying a $35k sign on bonus. Yet ALPA say E3's are hold down wages? What planet are they on?
|
I saw a statement on APC (I think) that Allegiant Airlines is hiring E3s. It didn't offer any documentation of that nor have I found anything concrete to verify. Anyone know anything ?
|
Originally Posted by bafanguy
(Post 11332885)
I saw a statement on APC (I think) that Allegiant Airlines is hiring E3s. It didn't offer any documentation of that nor have I found anything concrete to verify. Anyone know anything ?
Here you go. I don't know anything more than the screenshot, which I saw on FB. |
DYS,
Thanks. That's pretty "concrete" !! I'm not on FB which explains why I couldn't find it. As of yesterday, it wasn't on Allegiant's pilot-hiring site. |
Originally Posted by bafanguy
(Post 11332894)
DYS,
Thanks. That's pretty "concrete" !! I'm not on FB which explains why I couldn't find it. As of yesterday, it wasn't on Allegiant's pilot-hiring site. https://jobs.lever.co/allegiantair/2...8-0933fea66b75 |
I've also heard rumors of other carriers looking at Chilean, Singaporean and Canadian nationals. I'm not sure what visas, or why those particular nationalities, but that definitely adds fuel to Alpa's fire.
|
Originally Posted by All hat and no cows
(Post 11332419)
Of course under Trump, your money was worth a lot more, and your 401K was worth a lot more,we weren’t on the verge of WW3 but yes couldn’t agree more there are stupid people everywhere.
|
Originally Posted by DropYourSocks
(Post 11332904)
I've also heard rumors of other carriers looking at Chilean, Singaporean and Canadian nationals. I'm not sure what visas, or why those particular nationalities...
I suppose those mentioned nationalities have an existing, proven visa track in place ? I have no idea what visa Canadians would be using. I think I tried to research that one time but got frustrated and gave up. But if Canadians are employable, I'd think the airlines would hit that hard since the license conversion is relatively easy...and there appear to be lots of Canadians to be had. The Allegiant thread on APC addressing this subject gave me a chuckle with one guy speculating that, "Maybe they ran out of Aussies." Gotta keep laughing, right ? https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/a...nationals.html |
My employer, a legacy Australian carrier recently had a guy no-show for a 737 F/O course because he had started at Atlas, and another hold file guy declined a job because of the now poor starting pay. That has caused a lot of welcome discussion at work, and evidence of how weak bargaining has eroded our conditions to the point that we are now a “second choice” job.
The same thing is happening across the street apparently, and quite a few guys are now openly speculating about quitting. I think Australian airline management will ensure that the well of Australian pilots will never run dry. |
Originally Posted by Australopithecus
(Post 11333129)
I think Australian airline management will ensure that the well of Australian pilots will never run dry.
I just thought the comment about running out of Aussies was funny. |
I've got a mate at American Airlines that wants to flow to Envoy, check the sign on bonus there now :cool:
|
Originally Posted by bafanguy
(Post 11333208)
I agree. The principle is the same worldwide: seats will be filled and airplanes will be flown...regardless.
I just thought the comment about running out of Aussies was funny. If anyone is still in doubt about the disparity between careers at home vs here, you need not look further than the latest Alaska TA. They nailed down some excellent quality of life improvements and some relatively solid pay increases. If nothing else, hopefully this will inspire some fight from the folks holding down the home front. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....fec517deae.png https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....fd55a06351.png https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....c6cf434dd4.png https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....25b72fadb4.png https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....a7eb8f837a.png |
Direct Entry Captains for PSA Airlines
Limited time sign-on bonus of $100,000 (Bonus paid immediately upon employment) |
Talked to a mate of mine, who’s been doing interviews for the past few years. We discussed the decrease in experience that my Chicago based legacy is seeing amongst interview candidates and his comment was a surprise…..”We’re going to have to start looking at Aussies, Kiwis, Brits and Euros, if we want to maintain the experience level”. The main issue is ALPA but it shows it’s being discussed at the US legacies. If it happens and it’s a big if, it has the potential to decimate Australian aviation. QF and VA simply couldn’t match the T+C’s we’d be offering.
|
Been lurking and enjoying the evolution, wish this sort of stuff was happening a few decades ago!
Questions: - are PSA taking on/sponsoring external Captains or is it solely sourcing First Officers some of whom may (possibly) commence a Captain's course the first day they step through the door? - what are the age restrictions for domestic US operations? Apologies if asked before, things changing - and improving - at a great rate or so it seems. Thanks, cheers |
Originally Posted by Kenny
(Post 11333589)
Talked to a mate of mine, who’s been doing interviews for the past few years. We discussed the decrease in experience that my Chicago based legacy is seeing amongst interview candidates and his comment was a surprise…..”We’re going to have to start looking at Aussies, Kiwis, Brits and Euros, if we want to maintain the experience level”.
Your friend's comment is very interesting...especially since he's doing interviews. His comment that "...if we want to maintain the experience level." is a critical qualifier. I can't forecast anything with certainty but will venture a guess that the legacies will accept lower experience levels vs the wildcard of pilots hired on renewable visas that are subject to political whims...and may be cancelled when it suits some political harlots. There may be some comforting certainty in being able to bring along lower-time pilots vs risking training cost and line utilization in accepting some 2K hour regional ATPs in lieu of visa holders ? Your employer hired people with minimal hours in the 1960s and they worked out very well long term. True enough, they sat on the F/E seat and watched for a couple of years but that form of learning has limited utility. And today, there are learning avenues that may equal or exceed that (simulators, etc.). Eventually, there's no substitute for grabbing the bull by the horns and flying it. And people have done that successfully with limited total time but under controlled circumstances. This is really fun to watch. |
Originally Posted by bafanguy
(Post 11333661)
Kenny,
Your friend's comment is very interesting...especially since he's doing interviews. His comment that "...if we want to maintain the experience level." is a critical qualifier. I can't forecast anything with certainty but will venture a guess that the legacies will accept lower experience levels vs the wildcard of pilots hired on renewable visas that are subject to political whims...and may be cancelled when it suits some political harlots. There may be some comforting certainty in being able to bring along lower-time pilots vs risking training cost and line utilization in accepting some 2K hour regional ATPs in lieu of visa holders ? Your employer hired people with minimal hours in the 1960s and they worked out very well long term. True enough, they sat on the F/E seat and watched for a couple of years but that form of learning has limited utility. And today, there are learning avenues that may equal or exceed that (simulators, etc.). Eventually, there's no substitute for grabbing the bull by the horns and flying it. And people have done that successfully with limited total time but under controlled circumstances. This is really fun to watch. Of course if US legacies somehow ended up looking abroad for pilots, it would send ripples through Australian aviation. People are already bailing out of QF ground school to go to Atlas. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.