|
Ha ha well it did get the gist of the article. Anyway, to get Stanley Ho as your partner smacks of desperation.
|
Nuisance eligibility challenges, but also she has no need to challenge Drainage (CPA)." But she must've said: "I Do not believe it generous full-Asia's most important "
OK, I've put the screws in the second battery cover, how do I fit the batteries in? Must be missing something:):) So.. Another disaster in HKG. When will muffin man throw in the towel? The man is a danger to himself and a burden to others. Worse, he is making Australian business a laughing stock. When you add his efforts to the ALP, what damage is this doing to us as a country??? |
"Qantas subsidiary Jetstar cheap Air Group"
Should be the official name |
Looking at the SIN departure boards today, between 3pm and 8pm there are 2 cancelled 3K services to KUL, 1 cancelled JQ service to DRW and 1 cancelled JQ service to PEK. The PEK service is already 3 weekly and this week they cancelled one service. With SQ being 28 weekly why does JQ even try and compete?
|
^^Maybe JQ can't think of any other options for using their fleet.
|
Dr Pepz
Last time I checked, SQ considered itself a 'full service' carrier while Jetstar is a low cost carrier. This vital difference hardly makes them competitors! |
Yeah, guess that makes it ok to cancel services. It's not like you're screwing over anyone who matters......:rolleyes:
|
Today's cancelled flights ex SIN:
JQ60 to Darwin again 3K551 to Ho Chi Minh City JQ8 to Melbourne (the PEK flight is operating though) 3K689 to Kuala Lumpur again 3K697 to Hong Kong 3K665 to Kuala Lumpur again Also - QF SIN MEL is on many days 40% cheaper than JQ I was going to book to Taipei this Sunday, and SQ was trying to charge S$1278 (AUD1100) for the 4h45min flight. 3K is charging SGD560 return. However SQ is now completely full. 3K has seats wide open So the DRW flight was cancelled today and yesterday. How long more can QF keep up with SINDRW when they can't provide the onward feed to Europe? |
PM
I neither know nor care why Jetstar cancelled the flights to which the Doc referred in his post. He questioned why Jetstar compete with SQ: I simply suggested that they don't. And who said it was OK to cancel flights? :mad::ugh: Dr Pepz Are 3K/JQ taking the concept of 'demand scheduling' too far? (There's nothing wrong with the concept provided it's done in good time and the punters appropriately protected IMHO.) |
I can't for an IATA standard for delayed or cancelled flight compensation for punters.
1star has cancelled a few flights on me over the last year alone. once sold me a ticket in Singapore for Dwn then 1hr later cancelled so had 12hr lay up. Oh if you haven't guessed I hate Jetstar. poor service, bad attitudes to passengers. Can't wait for VA to serve Singapore someday! |
Jetstar and Virgin Australia are not IATA carriers. They would treat their disrupted punters either in accord with applicable Consumer Law or their own policies. Don't expect too much from either.
|
Interesting post Dr P and thanks for it (trust they don't close the thread because of what appears to be a bit of a clash over different points of view.) by and large a good thread :ok:
Today's cancelled flights ex SIN: JQ60 to Darwin again 3K551 to Ho Chi Minh City JQ8 to Melbourne (the PEK flight is operating though) 3K689 to Kuala Lumpur again 3K697 to Hong Kong 3K665 to Kuala Lumpur again Also - QF SIN MEL is on many days 40% cheaper than JQ possibly a low demand seasonal thing this time of year? (don't have access to any figures right now...) Also - QF SIN MEL is on many days 40% cheaper than JQ I was going to book to Taipei this Sunday, and SQ was trying to charge S$1278 (AUD1100) for the 4h45min flight. 3K is charging SGD560 return. However SQ is now completely full. 3K has seats wide open It reminds of the story last week about the progress of J* Japan. Macquarie Equities estimates Jetstar Japan is losing about $50 million a year as it competes against Peach and AirAsia Japan. Jetstar Japan has grown quicker, and is now about twice the size of AirAsia Japan. After initially relying on selling tickets via the internet, the airlines are looking to boost ways of encouraging consumers to fly with them in a market where people tend to book through travel agents. Mr Onishi said Jetstar Japan had been able to win passengers in the high season but in the low season it was ''difficult to get passengers by the web or direct sales''. Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce said the budget airline was still on track to become profitable within three years of its launch. Qantas is also waiting longer than expected for regulatory approval to launch Jetstar Hong Kong, a joint venture with China Eastern. ''We believe we have a solid case that is no different from what our competitors are operating up there,'' Mr Joyce said at the airline conference in Cape Town. ''People really want this because the fares in Hong Kong are too high.'' A new government in Hong Kong has made slight changes in the past month to what it deems a local airline. It has meant Jetstar Hong Kong has had to make changes to its application for regulatory approval. In many Asian countries, people still prefer to use a Travel agent to book their travel, (group travel is huge) unlike Oz or Europe who seem to be more comfortable with the internet. I guess this may mess with the JQ model in parts of Asia somewhat, which relies heavily on the web back in Aus. Premium Asian branded carriers are still strong in Asia, many carry the nations hearts, they are patriotic to their counties carrier simply because their local language is spoken, it is a natural draw for them. Other words, although English is widely spoken in Asia, there are a lot of non English speaking Asians, now more than ever, flying and believe it or not, are also comfortable and proud of their languages. Sometimes I think, the western version LCC model approach applied in some Asian countries may be too brutal for the local business culture... (disclaimer I know the LCC's are growing in Asia, but for the size of the Asian market I think still very small compared to the LCC grow rate in Europe or OZ) Asia is a lot more complicated. Here we are again coming up to the end of June 2013 and our business leaders are still talking about "Off-Shoring" this time NZ. This piece from the ABC tonight was interesting but worrying.. becoming a well worn business trend these days....:hmm: It's all over the place.... .. |
Shoot your researcher Ken. Virgin has been an IATA member for a while now. Wonder how accurate your other info might be. :ugh::hmm:
|
PM
Counselling and retribution complete. He says 'mea culpa! :ok: |
Hahaha. Fair enuf!
|
Could the thread be more appropriately titled.
"Qantas to invest in one third share owned airline franchised under Jetstar branding". Isn't that what is really is. A one third stake in an entity where 100% of the franchise agreement is paid back to the Qantas Group. Make money thru the franchise deal. MC |
I have a small problem with your use of the word 'invest' MC, otherwise it seems accurate...
|
"Qantas to invest in one third share owned airline franchised under Jetstar branding". Isn't that what is really is. A one third stake in an entity where 100% of the franchise agreement is paid back to the Qantas Group. Make money thru the franchise deal. MC Interesting piece in today's SMH, It's destination Hong Kong - and at any price It is 2007 in the world's new casino capital of Macau, and Qantas executives are knocking on as many doors as they can in the former sleepy Portuguese enclave. With the botched $11 billion private-equity raid on Qantas fresh in their minds, the airline's executives are so desperate to find a partner in north Asia that they are talking to both of Macau's airlines. The two-timing with Air Macau and Viva Macau is part of a strategy to gain a north Asian foothold for Qantas' low-cost franchise, Jetstar. With the hurdles too high elsewhere, they are searching for a way into markets on the doorstep of the most-prized market of them all - China. Several Qantas heavyweights - including then chief executive Geoff Dixon and finance chief Peter Gregg - are flown in for talks with their counterparts at the two Macau airlines. But the talks amount to nothing, with Qantas deciding its potential partners were too much of a gamble. It was probably just as well. Viva Macau collapsed three years later, and Air Macau remains a small player even as hundreds of thousands of Chinese flock to the city's gaming dens every year. But six years on, the links built in Macau could well prove to be Qantas's trump card as it attempts to gain access to nearby Hong Kong - a Holy Grail for airlines. The battle for the Hong Kong skies pits oneworld alliance partners Qantas and Cathay Pacific against each other, as well as some of Hong Kong's powerful business people. It also drags in well-connected interests from mainland China. It is testing the resolve of Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce and his trusted Jetstar boss, Jayne Hrdlicka, and on the other side that of Cathay boss John Slosar and his heir, Ivan Chu. The former British trading colony's location at the crossroads of Asia has been treasured for centuries. Even today, Hong Kong is ideally placed for the 21st century's preferred mode of transport. Last year, more than 56 million people passed through Chek Lap Kok's vast terminals - about 19 million more than those that went through Sydney Airport. Importantly for airlines, Hong Kong is within five hours' flying time of all the other major Asian financial centres, making it one of the world's most prized aviation hubs. http://images.smh.com.au/2013/10/04/...kong-300x0.jpg The battle for Hong Kong skies. Qantas, with Joyce at the helm, is determined to launch its low-cost offshoot into this potentially lucrative market before its Asian budget rivals. But Cathay, the airline that has held the keys to Hong Kong for decades, is putting up the fight of its life - even if that means going to war against its founding oneworld alliance partner. After deflecting questions for months about the new entrant, Cathay ripped off the gloves a month ago when it filed its formal opposition to Jetstar Hong Kong with regulators. ''The setting up of Jetstar Hong Kong is an attempt by a foreign carrier to gain access to Hong Kong's pool of traffic rights without a fair exchange of value to Hong Kong,'' it thundered. The ferocity of its attack surprised many who thought it would be better served lobbying aggressively behind the scenes. But Cathay has everything to lose. Its fear is not that it has to contend with a budget airline that plans to begin flying with just six planes. Instead, the worry is that the arrival of Jetstar will open the floodgates to many airlines, including the large Chinese carriers wanting to set up shop on their home turf. ''Cathay's view is that we have to fight this one to the death otherwise there are going to be many more airlines coming after Jetstar,'' says Andrew Pyne, the former Viva Macau chief executive, who also advised the territory's last governor, Chris Patten, on aviation matters. ''If an Australian carrier, as they see it, is allowed to use Hong Kong as an access point to China, then there is going to be a reaction from the Chinese carriers, and they would want to get into Hong Kong,'' Pyne says. As a place to base a low-cost airline, Hong Kong has its pitfalls. An Australian who knows Hong Kong and aviation better than most is Rod Eddington. The former chief executive of British Airways and Cathay says the city is both a competitive aviation market and an expensive place to run a business. ''The two most competitive markets in Asia are Hong Kong and Singapore because everybody flies there and everyone wants traffic rights to these places,'' he says. ''It's one thing to set up in Malaysia and Indonesia. But in Hong Kong and Singapore you are taking on two extremely successful, very combative, major Asian players.'' To much fanfare, Joyce unveiled the blueprint for the Jetstar offshoot in Hong Kong in March last year. Trumpeting its ''first-mover advantage'', the Qantas CEO talked of the ''huge potential'' to tap mainland China where the number of passengers is forecast to grow from 300 million a year to 450 million by 2015. The plan was for Jetstar Hong Kong to begin flying by the middle of this year using three Airbus A320s, before growing to 18 by 2015. With Qantas and alliance partner China Eastern each taking a 50 per cent stake, Joyce pointed out that he did not see the need for any other partners for Jetstar Hong Kong. But as a year passed, doubts grew about whether the new airline would get off the ground. The regulatory hurdles were stacked against it amid Cathay's lobbying power. Enter socialite and businesswoman Pansy Ho, the daughter of Macau gaming billionaire Stanley Ho. Dispelling fears the game was over, the Hos' listed conglomerate Shun Tak bought a third of Jetstar Hong Kong in June for $US66 million. For Qantas, the dilution of its stake was a small price to pay - the new offshoot stood little chance without the influential support of Shun Tak . The Ho family is Macau's de facto royal family, controlling everything from casinos to retail, transport, tourism and property assets. Its tentacles stretch into Hong Kong where Pansy Ho holds court at Shun Tak as its managing director. Her father Stanley, now 91, would be driven around Hong Kong in a burgundy Rolls-Royce with a number plate ''HK1''. According to those who witnessed his grand entrances, Ho's driver bore a striking resemblance to Oddjob, the henchman to Goldfinger in the James Bond film. Of Ho's 17 children to four wives, Pansy has emerged as an heir apparent to the Ho empire. ''She is a very shrewd businesswoman and a very tough lady. I would go as far as to call her ruthless in the way she operates but I have a grudging respect for her,'' Pyne says. ''Within the whole empire there is quite a lot of internecine squabbling, to put it kindly, and she has come out at the top of it. She is quite an impressive lady.'' Australians will be more familiar with one of her brothers, Lawrence, who is James Packer's business partner in casino joint venture Melco Crown. But in Hong Kong it is Pansy Ho, the territory's richest woman, who hugs the headlines. In years past, the tabloids christened her ''Party Girl Pansy'' for her exploits on the social circuit. She might be the antithesis of budget travel, but with her now ensconced as chairwoman of Jetstar Hong Kong, the airline has given itself a flying chance of setting up operations at Chek Lap Kok Airport. ''I couldn't think of a better local partner - financial business smarts and political connections there [in Hong Kong] and on the mainland,'' a China-based Australian executive says. ''It is a first-class choice [for Qantas and Jetstar] - they have done very well there.'' Her arrival reads straight from the Hos' playbook. Shun Tak began in the 1970s as a ferry operator, while its interests in aviation have also included a helicopter shuttle service between Macau and Hong Kong. It is not the first time Shun Tak has been courted by an Australian airline. Back in 2004, the conglomerate was one of the parties Virgin Blue's then chief executive, Brett Godfrey, talked to about setting up a budget airline in Macau to operate flights to mainland China. '' They have got form in getting involved in tourism and aviation interests. Obviously with the casinos, the whole business is about bringing people to spend their money in Macau,'' an executive with knowledge of those talks recalls. ''They are a good fit [for Qantas] and natural partner with aligned interests in terms of a low-cost carrier model of getting passengers, particularly inbound passengers, to that region.'' But even with Macau's most famous family on board, Qantas faces a battle in getting Jetstar Hong Kong flying. In the other corner with Cathay is its short-haul offshoot, Dragonair - the group's main weapon on routes to the mainland - and Chinese-backed Hong Kong Airlines and its sister carrier Hong Kong Express. Later this month Hong Kong Express will be relaunched as a low-cost carrier, pre-empting the arrival of Jetstar-badged planes from Hong Kong. Qantas has surprised many people in Hong Kong by fighting what some grudgingly term ''a half-decent rearguard action''. ''But Cathay are not going to go down without a fight. Even if they did get into the market and it was a three-way battle, it would get brutal very fast. Cathay don't want to lose money but if they have to rationalise the market I suppose they would,'' one former Asian aviation executive says. ''What Hong Kong Airlines would stomach, who knows.'' While the Hos are well connected, it is important not to underestimate the power of Cathay and its biggest shareholder, Swire Group, which is synonymous with the ''Pearl of the Orient''. Cathay's second-largest shareholder is Beijing-based Air China, one of the mainland's big-three airlines. And Cathay has been one of the best protectors of its turf of any airline in the region. ''Cathay are trying to protect their market. Companies all have great free-trade rhetoric except when they are on the receiving end,'' Commonwealth Bank analyst Matt Crowe says. ''They are just trying to tilt the playing field in their favour.'' Jetstar's bid to launch flights will rest on the Hong Kong aviation regulator's interpretation of ''principle place of business'', as defined under the territory's constitution known as the ''Basic Law''. The law was designed around the Cathay ownership structure. The concept, developed in the 1980s, was designed to ensure Cathay's existence after Britain's handover of Hong Kong in 1997 to China. With the change in sovereignty, neither the locals nor the mainland authorities wanted the Chinese airlines to descend en masse on Hong Kong. The territory was to be Cathay's sphere of influence with the mainland carved up by the big three - Air China in Beijing, China Eastern in Shanghai and China Southern in Guangzhou. In a nutshell, the law means that it does not matter who owns a Hong Kong airline - whether onshore or offshore - provided its genuine place of business is the territory. It cannot be an affiliate of another airline or controlled from somewhere else. If it meets this criteria, it is designated as a Hong Kong airline and in turn gains the benefits that flow from that. One of the tests is where the ultimate decision making of a Hong Kong airline rests. In this regard, Cathay has always been careful that its board meetings are held in Hong Kong. Both the Cathay CEO and Jetstar's top brass in Australia and Hong Kong declined requests for interviews. Jetstar has maintained it is confident its Hong Kong airline will be flying soon, and is attempting to win in the court of public opinion by promising to serve the territory's flyers with low fares. It has repeatedly pointed to research which claims there is overwhelming support in Hong Kong for a local budget airline. For Qantas shareholders, the question is whether it is worth the fight. Jetstar has a chequered report card in Asia. Almost nine years after its largest offshoot was launched in Singapore, Jetstar Asia is still struggling to post strong results. In Vietnam, Jetstar Pacific has had its fair share of troubles. They include secret police barring two Australian executives from leaving the country for six months in 2010. In Japan, the Jetstar joint venture is still in its infancy, having been launched last year. Now, much faith is being placed on making Jetstar Hong Kong fly. To date, Hong Kong and Macau haven't been easy hunting grounds for budget airlines - the failed airlines Oasis Hong Kong and Viva Macau are cases in point. But Qantas and Jetstar executives are expending considerable efforts on this bid. Working in the shadows for Qantas as a consultant in China is Geoff Raby, the former ambassador to China regarded as the man for hire for Australian companies wanting advice about the diplomatic dance required in the world's second-largest economy. It also has the lobbying power of China Eastern to call upon in the mainland. Debate has long raged internally at Qantas about where to position the airline group's centre of gravity in Asia. Many have favoured Singapore because Jetstar's main Asian operations are already operating from the city's Changi Airport. But others support Hong Kong because it is in the middle of Asia - and, importantly, much of its wealth. The territory is one step into China but yet governed by a clear rule of law as opposed to that on the mainland. Hong Kong has been on the Qantas radar for a long time. In 2008, a paper to Qantas management recommended Hong Kong as a base for the so-called north Asia ''mega region'', encompassing China, Japan and Korea. It was seen as a logical spot because most of the biggest cities in Asia are within five hours flying time - about the maximum distances for Jetstar's workhorse A320s. But even if Jetstar Hong Kong gains a licence to operate commercial flights, it faces a higher set of obstacles in gaining the right to fly to destinations in mainland China. Drawing upon his knowledge as Cathay CEO from 1992 to early 1997, Eddington says one of the big hurdles for Jetstar will be gaining access to routes from Hong Kong to mainland China and other Asian destinations. That's because it will require the airline to negotiate for access to bilateral air-rights agreements between countries. While countries such as Singapore have relatively liberal views on access to foreign airlines, others including China take a more measured approach to negotiations. ''It requires Jetstar to negotiate traffic rights to fly to these other places from Hong Kong. The Chinese authorities in Beijing aren't necessarily going to be handing out these rights immediately,'' he says. ''They will want to ensure they gain benefits and access from the countries at the other ends of the routes. And current Hong Kong-based carriers will have their own ambitions for additional Hong Kong traffic rights as they become available.'' Then there's the cost of doing business in Hong Kong, and gaining landing slots at the city's already congested airport. While Jetstar might be able to bring in cabin crew from the mainland, it will have to hire pilots and engineers based in Hong Kong, where the cost of living is among the highest in Asia. Of course, the same assumption could have been made of Sydney or Melbourne more than a decade ago. But Virgin Blue and Jetstar were able to establish themselves in the market. The battle now raging in Hong Kong offers riches to the winners but costs aplenty to those who fall short. This weekend, Joyce will be in Seattle, the US city that is the home of Nirvana, Starbucks and Boeing. There, he will finally take the keys to Jetstar's first state-of-the-art 787 Dreamliner - albeit almost four years late. He has described the plane as a game changer. Across the Pacific Ocean in Hong Kong, the other game changer now rests in the hands of the city's regulators. If history is any guide, it promises to be a long and bumpy ride. Video Published on 26 Mar 2012 |
From some aviation movie I remember from the '80's:
'That's a helluva gamble with a $30m plane Lieutenant' To add to all the other gambles/failures. Who cares? Get paid anyway. If idiots want to slog their guts out to fund our lifestyles, why shouldn't we take it out for a spin and see how far we can go.... |
Has China Eastern lost patience with Jetstar HKG. This from "The Standard" newspaper in HKG.
Eastern Airlines to launch budget carrier (07-02 18:56) China Eastern Airlines said Wednesday it would transform one of its units into a budget airline, the first Chinese state carrier to do so. China's second biggest airline by passenger volume said its Beijing-based domestic carrier China United Airlines would become a low-cost flyer as the country liberalises its commercial aviation market, AFP reports. "We believe the low-cost carrier market has enormous growth potential in China given its low penetration rate,'' the airline's company secretary James Wang said. Ticket prices may be reduced by up to 40 percent, the company said according to the official Xinhua news agency, as it seeks to compete with several private budget carriers already operating there, including Spring Airlines and Juneyao Airlines. Last year, the government lifted a six-year ban on establishing new airlines as it deals with growing air-traffic demand. China United Airlines, which operates 26 Boeing 737 aircraft flying to around 70 locations in China, plans to triple the size of its fleet to 80 aircraft by 2019. China's airlines carried 350 million passengers last year, up nearly 11 percent from 2012, according to official figures. The country's civil aviation authorities said it will have more than 230 airports by 2015, up from 193 last year. China's huge and growing high-speed rail network, however, has resulted in some shorter flight routes being terminated. |
..and if Jetstar HongKong has any staff who understand the Jetstar / LCC business model, then Eastern will poach them.
Its a lethal technique in Asia - offer your competitors critical staff a tiny equity stake in your business and they will always jump ship. Ownership is a very powerful incentive in Asia. |
Sunfish.
Word is that the intellectual property has already left the JQ HGK building. I don't know numbers but believe there is only a handful of people left in HKG in a last ditch effort to get JQ HKG approvals. MC. |
Jetstar Hong Kong - evaporating raison d'etre
This announcement by MU, is another harbinger of doom for JHK. It joins a long list of increasingly pessimistic markers for the embattled wannabe in HKG.
First mover advantage has now gone. Hong Kong Express has taken the yellow jersey and is the first LCC domiciled in the fragrant harbour. Slots get ever more constrained as the 'noise lobby' grows increasingly powerful and the incumbent carriers expand into, and soak up the available capacity at CLK. The Jetstar pan-asia strategy is visibly struggling. Jetstar Asia is unprofitable. Jetstar Pacific is a political nightmare. Jetstar Hong Kong is a distant dream. Jetstar Japan is slow and problematic. I won't mention the issues emerging with the Jetstar mothership in Australia and New Zealand. And, of course, we are all abundantly aware of the existential problems that Qantas faces. All of which shines a very bright light on the implications from this announcement by MU that they are going it alone with the development of a LCC in China. It has long been my view that Jetstar Hong Kong was a beach-head operation. An opening ambit. A foothold on the mainland. A way of gaining access to the Peoples Republic of China. As we all know, the growth potential of the PRC is gigantic. I have long suspected that Jetstar saw the Hong Kong operation as a first step toward the ultimate goal - spawning their franchise into China. China Eastern was seen as a suitable partner - not only because Cathay spurned Qantas, but because MU presented access to China. Therefore, the announcement that China Eastern is now 'going it alone' with a LCC in China, is the starkest evidence yet that MU has lost confidence in the ability of Jetstar to deliver on their undertaking to establish an airline in Hong Kong. In a world of rational self-interest - Jetstar was using China Eastern (for local credibility and market access) and China Eastern was using Jetstar (for know-how). Now that it has become evident that Qantas and Jetstar lack the requisite know-how - China Eastern have quite rightly decided to go it alone. Perhaps Qantas could come to an arrangement with China Eastern; to sell them all the surplus airframes that are dotted around France. That way MU gets it's LCC up and running quickly and Qantas/Jetstar are able to reduce the burden of countless idle aircraft??? |
Hials:
As we all know, the growth potential of the PRC is gigantic The growth potential for Chinese owned and controlled businesses is gigantic. The growth potential for non Chinese businesses that do not have ironclad control of their intellectual property or another barrier to entry is flat effing ZERO!!!! How do I get this message through the thick heads around here? The only people in China allowed to make money out of other Chinese are Chinese! Even if Jetstar HK was ever established, the chances of it (a) making a profit and (b) repatriating that profit to Australia are plain ******* zero! There is no way Jetstar HKG can ever make a profit for the Qantas group, at best you might get one dollar more than you invested. |
I disagree.
It's not about the Chinese. This is an issue of Australian failure. China Eastern is simply moving on - having been victims of an abject failure by the Australians to produce what they promised. The partnership fidelity of MU has never been tested. The Australians let them down. |
Hials, my family has traded with Asia since 1935. There is a wealth of experience, often bitter, to back up my contention.
For the record, that is that every cent Qantas puts into Asia will be lost because people like you think that Asians think like Westerners and have the same values; they don't. It is possible to make money in Asia, but not with the Qantas mindset. To make money, plan to spend many millions over Twenty or more years with no prospect of reward to establish relationships. Just jumping in and announcing you are open for business, as Qantas has done, will get you exactly what Jetstar has got; zero. P.S. Relationships with not just anybody, I watched an I.T. company waste $3 million on a tender for a non existent I.T project brought to it by "the nephew of the Chinese Minister". F.F.S. Australian companies are wood ducks when it comes to dealing with Asia, start with Rio Tinto, then look at various coal companies. |
Are you Sue Wilkins?
Whatever the merits of your arguments might be - they are lost. You are a vitriolic racist.
|
There is no question the idiots running QF/Jet* would have contributed to any failure, but I would argue the Chinese Govt saved them from a more catastrophic long term failure by (how can I put this most politely?) a very, very detailed consideration of any regulation that might ever affect the operation. Especially when said regulators would have been all too aware that their careful consideration was sending idiots with bigger egos broke. Much as I would like to lay blame on the most incompetent bunch of Australians since fund managers loaded up on Bond Corp, I cannot and most could not see regulatory approval ever happening. They should be taken out and shot for trying it on, but blaming them for failing after deciding the idiotic thought bubble might be a good idea is being a bit harsh.
I think as Sunfish pointed out, it is extraordinarily lucky for the Coward St Muppets that the Phantom Airline is mostly parked in Europe and not China. HIALS: I might be so bold as to suggest Sunfish is not a Vitriolic Rascist, more an analyst with a keen interest in nationalistic business perceptions. I see nothing other than experience based on facts (certainly nothing I have seen suggests he is wrong with his assumptions) being pointed out. Most nations I feel are similar, the Chinese simply have more money thrown at them than others.... |
Hials, my family has traded with Asia since 1935. There is a wealth of experience, often bitter, to back up my contention.
For the record, that is that every cent Qantas puts into Asia will be lost because people like you think that Asians think like Westerners and have the same values; they don't. this is not just an Australian problem either. It is possible to make money in Asia, but not with the Qantas mindset. To make money, plan to spend many millions over Twenty or more years with no prospect of reward to establish relationships. Just jumping in and announcing you are open for business, as Qantas has done, will get you exactly what Jetstar has got; zero. |
Hials, you are a fool. Asia is not Europe. Western values are not Chinese values. It is not racist to say so.
In Asia face is everything, it is an insult to refer to a written contract or to require someone to sign one. Relationships are everything. You do not do business like you do in Sydney. There are business ethics in China, but they are not your Western ethics. In some ways they are tougher, in others looser. If you do not understand these things then God help you. I have one friend who suicided over a failed Asian venture and a few acquaintances who lost their shirts the same way. If you think that its racist to try and explain that you are dealing with a culture that has different values, then more fool you. |
Sunfish you lose credibility when you throw your toys out of the pram and resort to name calling simply because someone has a different view to yours. Yes you can sprout about your families 80 years of experience in business with "Asia", and in this environment you will be supported by the anonymous masses because you are attacking the employer everyone hates at the moment, but let others have there view as well.
|
Sunfish is in the money.
For the record, sunfish is Asian :) |
HIALS,you might start by reading "Taipan":E.
|
HIALS,sorry,the Author is James Clavell.
"The only thing new in the world, is the history you don't known yet" |
I think the one high profile businessman in Australia who actually understands the game the Chinese like to play is Clive Palmer. From the ramblings it seems like Citic Pacific came here and tried to take Clive Palmer's mining leases for what they worth and got played for all they're worth in return. In getting burned big time they are trying to take him down on a technicality relative pocket money that's been allegedly misappropriated.
But at least Citic got a mine out of it Seems to me that Qantas didn't get anything out of Jetstar HKG, just the opportunity to do some LCC ground work with an interested partner, MU, who then decided to start up their own LCC. Seems like MU did well out of this, saved them a lot of R&D and groundwork. |
Gasbags:
resort to name calling simply because someone has a different view to yours. |
We seem to have degenerated into a petty argument when really it seems everyone is agreeing. Doing business in Asia is different from western cultures; not better or worse, just different. Whichever way you look at it, QF have been played in their JQ Asian ventures. Through a combination of stupidity, arrogance and hubris they have managed to lose and continue to lose millions.
Jetstar Hong Kong has been terminal for months and MU's announcement just confirms it. If QF's auditors are any good, they will be demanding that Qantas write off their entire investment as part of the FY14 accounts because it is unlikely this money will ever be recovered. AJ's pipe dream of an Asia wide Jetstar operation returning millions to QF is now shown to be the pipe-dream it always was. He could have made much more money properly developing Jetstar and reinvigorating mainline here in Australia. Instead, he has left these businesses moribund with little strategy and has been attacked from competitors who sensed the weakness. In years to come, people will get MBAs writing thesis about the mismanagement that has go on in Mascot. |
If QF's auditors are any good, they will be demanding that Qantas write off their entire investment as part of the FY14 accounts because it is unlikely this money will ever be recovered. If you are going to have a bad year, make it a shocker. Think of it as a toxic waste barge allowing the all the trash to be floated away in one go. And never let a crisis go to waste. |
You are a vitriolic racist. |
This being the first week of FY 15, I find MU's timing interesting, are they hoping to achieve maximum damage to QF ?
It would appear that Qf were going to write down as many losses as they could during FY 14, making FY 15 appear to be the start of the 'miraculous' turn-around. The end of any hope for JHK would have to be the worst possible way to start the new financial year. Can they attribute the losses of winding-up JHK to FY14 when they gave no such guidance to the market that this was a possibility ? I don't know. In respect to Sunny's observations, they all seem to come true, unfortunately.:{ |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 21:30. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.