PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   BNE ATC Holding (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/450166-bne-atc-holding.html)

sleeve of wizard 4th May 2011 14:47

I've never worked anywhere were I've operated so close to MLW on such a consistent basis..and its often the limiting factor at the planning/dispatch stage.


Haughtney, the 777-300er will be landing weight limited on sectors of about 8-9hours, short intra gulf sectors unless your tankering will be zfw limited.

haughtney1 4th May 2011 15:21

Sleeve.....ummm, since we are talking about BNE holding, thats the context of my comment, as for short sectors, I dont tend to do many..and hence MLW weight comment as going to Vegas, or MEL invariable means having gas for each other for "operational flexibility"
Anyway..back on subject..nothing to see here :ok:

havick 4th May 2011 21:07

P-dubby. Agreed. But that does not help helo drivers (IFR), as you call up to get a slot time, response "no slot time needed", pilot response "but the weather is poo, can I get a slot time", response "no slot time needed for helo's".

Helo gets airborne, enroute to Brissy, helo pilot told "the weather is poo, do you have a slot time?", pilot response "no, told it wasn't required"..

Helo pilot now diverts to amberly to let down on the ILS and fly visual to parafield to pick up passengers due to 1 - 1.5 hr holding at brisbane..


That's but one scenario... Not having a go, but it would nice to be able to slot in to pick up your pax, even when the cloud is on the deck

max1 4th May 2011 23:59


Not sure if I really answered your question. BTW - in this instance did you request your Slot time via the adjoining sector, or by telephone to the Flow?
This should be interesting?

havick 5th May 2011 01:52

P-dubby via telephone..

The problem that arises now is every time I need to go into Brisbane I call up via telephone to organise a slot time, and told it's not required for helo's. Weather looks like it could go either way at this stage, therefore pilot is told that a slot time will not be given.

It's one of those circular things, you can't get in without a slot time (in bad weather), but you aren't given a slot time because at the time of the phone call the weather looks OK, but then it turns to custard and you have no slot time even though you have tried to do everything you can in the right fashion.

In the particular instance that I mentioned earlier fortunately we were able to transfer the pax to archerfield by road and pick them up there. But I can see it posing a problem in the future with a similar scenario if weather comes in. ie back of the line as you don't have a slot time, even though you endeavoured to get one 'just in case'.

** I'd like to add, I'm not having a go at the controllers they're obviously doing their best with a crappy situation. I'm just passing along what can/does occur from a IFR helo operator level.

Dick N. Cider 5th May 2011 02:36

Anyone want to take the bait about who answers the phone? On legal advice I bear no opinion at this stage.

Roger Sir 5th May 2011 07:58


Anyone want to take the bait about who answers the phone?
Could i suggest the NOC? It couldn`t be a real controller could it? The more i think about it the more i think it sounds like a job for the NOC.

It would be "seamless and beneficial" no doubt.....:D

max1 5th May 2011 11:06

Havick who are you ringing on the phone??????

Is it a high rise in the middle of Canberra that has two people on the nightshift because OH&S regs deem it is unsafe to have one person alone?

Or is it someone with operational experience at the airfield who can understand what your problem is ( i.e. not in a place a 1000km away where the CEO has come back from an OS trip and decided Australia should have one of those , staffed it with people who have bugger all operational experience but who can recite whatever corporate relations tell them to and still try to tell Qantas, Virgin, etc that everything is wonderful and there are no staff shortages??) and advise that you do actually need a slot time.

Dick.N.Cider and Roger, I believe we may be reading from the same book??

max1 5th May 2011 11:20

I'm having a 'robust' McClaren Vale Red but I may switch to Bundy to understand ARFOR.
Barring another desperate phone call tonight/tomorrow from my fully staffed employer I'll hope for an uninterrupted day off tomorrow. Fat chance.

havick 5th May 2011 11:23

max1, not sure if you're having a swipe at me... simply calling the number in the ersa as it directs you to for a slot time.

I'm not insinuating that my ops are more important than someone else.. in fact the opposite.. Merely suggesting that the practice that is in place is clearly not adequate if you can't even fly into a major airport and pick up some pax, even with trying to tick all the boxes.. It makes it difficult to guarantee any sort of service delivery if you're not sure whether you'll even manage to land at the airport (no crystal ball to look 2 - 3 weeks ahead at the weather for your arrival).

It's just getting harder and harder to get things done these days... I'm but one end user of the system.. we're all in this together.

havick 5th May 2011 11:33

my previous posts are probably a thread drift anyway, the originator was talking about holding times into brisbane.. I'm talking about slot times (or lack of) which is a different topic..

ARFOR 5th May 2011 11:34

Max ... on the same side .... broadcasting the ... cold hard reality

Don't worry, ;) many are scratching their collective heads trying to find a justification for Australia's application of safety critical resources!?!?! .. :rolleyes:

Angle of Attack 5th May 2011 12:39


I admit to being quite impressed watching the QF 737-800 hit the gates within 10 seconds for an RNP approach. But if the guy in front or behind is out by a minute that precision has been for nought in the overall picture.
Thanks for your info P-Dubby, obviously you are an ATCer and would be interested in your observations about how accurate aircraft make there set times at waypoints, I have flown with various others some try for a minute early others strive to the second, some +- 1 minute,but my guess would be you guys want it as spot on as possible right? I also echo a previous poster your posts are really valuable please dont shut up! :ok:

max1 5th May 2011 13:10

havick, DEFINITELY NOT having a swipe at you.
From an operational ATC point of view, just wondering whether you are being funneled by ersa to the National Operations Centre in Canberra( Airservices Australias version of a Mumbai call centre spawned by the CEO) or actually talking to someone within a light year of actually helping you.
For those in the know, the NOC decided they would draft and implement ALOFT (Ats Long-range Optimum Flow Tool) this year off their own bat. Incidents, debacles, etc. They were advised,warned and finally ALOFT was cancelled.
The NOC cannot be seen to be a failure as the CEO has decreed it. Hazeltons RIP.

Capn Bloggs 5th May 2011 13:29


I am not sure if anyone has ever rung them for a slot time - it would be interesting to know what they would say?
I have a few times. Always courteous, they have allocated me a new slot without fuss. I haven't liked the delay sometimes, but that's not their fault.

severidian 6th May 2011 00:02

EUROCONTROL - The CASSIS Flight Trials

Results of CASSIS trial at Arlanda of FMS for CTA OPS. You are correct that 1 minute is no where near accurate enough.

ATC generally use time to establish the sequence to a TMA volume at which point in trail distance is used, in general for high capacity OPS this is about +- 10 SEC accuracy.

Nautilus Blue 6th May 2011 02:08


I have a few times.
But you fly into that weird west coast airport. The only thing I like more than having a go at ASA is having a go at TFN personally, and I know slot times are a hopeless cause on this thread. But since slot times, most days I do less work to provide a better service to industry, and at worst its only as bad as it was before. The only down side is you have to let go of a little prejudice, and upgrade the NOC from WOFTAM to mostly WOFTAM.

amberale 6th May 2011 08:13

Havick, sounds like you are an IFR charter op.

If you plan this way and call for a slot when TAF/TTF indicate that an instrument approach is required then you should be able to get one.
It's a PITA to fit you in to a busy sequence because of the time you will take to do the approach but I don't know any flow's who would knock you back because of that.

The problem happens when the weather is marginal and the tower assures the TMA that there should be no problems with a helo getting visual on lowest safe altitudes.
If the WX goes to shtt then you lose out.

I suggest a call or visit to the center in BN to explain your concerns and sort out a solution.

Sound like BN has gotten worse since I left there 2 1/2 years ago but I don't think my departure has had an effect on that.:}

Keep up the good work PD [congrats on your flow rating btw]

AA

HF3000 6th May 2011 18:55

It seems this thread is attempting to ascertiain why a more efficient system could or couldn't be implemented but most defendants are saying that this is the system, like it or lump it. I suspect we are all constrained by inflexible policy makers, be they computer system designers or beaurocrats or both.

If only real world pilots and controllers could regain charge maybe some practical, useful and efficient solutions might prevail.

I saw a pig fly once, but I may have been mistaken.

Dick N. Cider 6th May 2011 19:47

Sadly the pigs are now retired. Replaced by some sort of super insect for the time being.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:26.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.