Just backing up on KB's post, why is it that the media haven't made a major comment on the air return of SQ212 yesterday. I watched the SQ 744 taxi back to Bay 25 with 2 fire tenders following, and my first thought was "I bet this isn't mentioned in the news tonight". If it was a security issue and obviously not a blown donk or smoking cockpit, is that not newsworthy, given the paranoia that the media whips up over aviation security. In line with the current trend of reporting any issue with aircraft making returns, we should expect unbiased reporting (disregard accurate, that's not in the equation!) from our newspapers and elecronic media. Perhaps they should all set aside a daily round up of aviation breakdowns, schedule disruptions and even provide links to aviation websites, because there is obviously plenty of marketable public interest (i.e filling media space between the ads!). When they get bored with that they could include train, bus and motor vehicle accidents and incidents, there would be no space left for ads!
One other point, can any journalist reading this explain why the Emirates A340 tail strike incident in Melbourne in March 2009, doesn't ever get mentioned (it was bordering on catastrophic), while Qantas is always fair game? Is the media's agenda to topple another "tall poppy", we Aussie's have become experts at that! End of rant :{ |
Ken's got a point about media selectivity. Brisbane had several overnight diversions the other day ......... The local media wrote it up as '200 Qantas passengers stranded in Brisbane' with nary a mention of the other carriers. |
Age of 747 fleet.
Oldest is 21 Most are over 15 Three are about 10-12 The ERs are 5-7 years old. South American route. Correct - ETOPS is not an option. For return EZE-SYD, fly down E coast of S America, over Cape Horn and keep going. For most of the flight, two closest diversions are either Cape Horn or Christchurch. Tahiti is over 2000nm to the North. Even though Antarctica is only 150nm away (you fly over the ice pack for several hours), McMurdo is still 1400nm away. It is very lonely. n |
two closest diversions are either Cape Horn or Christchurch. Tahiti is over 2000nm to the North. Even though Antarctica is only 150nm away....McMurdo is still 1400nm away. |
Qantas gets bashed in the media because the general expectation of the media and the travelling public, whether correct or not, is higher than the other carriers. Therefore when something happens, it has more shock factor. Many aviation experts/analysts come out in defence of the red rat at the same time "no,no, they are still the safest" etc, etc. The good with the bad i'm afraid.
|
<<then we were met by all the fire engines and fire brigade, there were reams and reams of them>> Isn't a ream 500? |
NZ television suggest QF should swap the red kangaroo for a red boomerang.
|
CF
Um, are you suggesting it is better to be 4hrs from an emergency standard airport in a 777 on one engine rather than 4.5 hrs from a proper one in a 747 on three? I know which I prefer. Have to run .... :) n |
"Kiltrash"
There are no alternative airports on this route. :eek:Every time I fly back to Sydney on QF18 I hope the headwinds arn't to bad as sometimes the plane gets down to below 450mph and the pilots keep heading south to find less headwind. I believe that if anything happened in the middle of the flight like loss of an engine the only diversion would be Christchurch or Auckland if you were lucky and some flights do land in Auckland on the way back to take on extra fuel. It s definately one of the most dangerous flights in the world but if the winds are against you the flight over Antarctica is definately worth the risk in the best 747-400's ever built.:ok: |
With a non contained cabin fire it doesn't really matter how many engines you have!:cool: Loss of engine wouldn't be the worst of your worries.
|
kimir,
Out of control cabin fire - doesn't matter where you are, result is the same. I seem to remember a DC-9 in Nth America - close to a stack of airports and by the time they landed the aircraft was pretty well destroyed. By that logic, we stay within 100nm of an airport. n |
RR have come out of this looking very shabby........ So We'll order a few hundred more for the 787....... Yet another incompetent decision from Qf management. About Qantas - Our Company - Fleet Developments - Boeing787 |
120 nm would be better! not very practical though. I'm just illustrating that it doesn't matter how many engines you have 2,3 or 4. Very reliable and powerful these days. Other things worry me more than a straight flame out.
|
NZ television suggest QF should swap the red kangaroo for a red boomerang :cool: |
Possibly because a couple of slides blowing and a bird strike that required an engine change are on a slightly different scale to flap tracks fairings falling into some back yard, Although they did mention the Jetstar turnback, I suspect it was only because they're a Qantas subsidiary :E My point about the media 'agenda' is that they clearly see a wounded animal and kick it when it's down. If they cared to actually do some research they'd have seen some far worthier stories in the charter airline segment over the last few years... but as usual, if it's not a big jet that just missed a school... it doesn't sell papers! |
The same aircraft having had the "smoke from the instrument panel" problem solved, made it to over to JNB, however didn't make it back to SYD, currently on the deck in JNB after a bird strike on take off.
Ok, these things happen, and the crews do an excellent job in returning the aircraft, but when you are paying top dollar on your way way to a crucial meeting to seal a deal, i'm sorry but I can't rely on QANTAS to deliver the goods any more. ......and this will affect QANTAS more than Mr & Mrs Smith from bogan town out on their once in a lifetime trip to somewhere overseas. |
7378FE: Probably the most stupid thing passengers say is " that's the last time I fly QF, from now on I will fly with XXX". You know what, you go and fly Emirate's, Singapore or Cathy and you will get the same thing happening there also. Delays, turnbacks etc happen to all airlines. Its part of flying. If you really want to get somewhere for a critical meeting you need to allow a few extra days in case your flight gets delayed. I've been flying for 30 years and I would not rely on ANY airline to arrive as scheduled, there is just so much that can go wrong. Most passengers read the papers and see the ridiculous reporting about Qantas, they assume wrongly that other airlines always depart on time, and never breakdown. Do some research before you change airlines, Think about the Emirates 340 that came ever so close to being Australia's worst aviation accident, or the one out of Joburg that nearly failed to get airborne. Also think about the Singapore tailscrape out of auckand, or the Singapore 747 that took off from a notamed closed runway, hit earthmoving equipment and killed about 80 pax.
|
Don't forget the Qantas 74 in bkk. But seriously the reporting has gotten out of hand.
|
Or the Virgin 737-700 nose wheel incident...
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.