PPRuNe Forums - 1* Safety??

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)

- Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)

- - 1* Safety?? (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/417054-1-safety.html)

beaver_rotate

3rd Jun 2010 03:47

1* Safety??

AO-2010-038

AO-2010-035

AO-2010-037

Bad week for onestar... naughty airbuses :=

feetonthedash

3rd Jun 2010 03:56

Scarebus 330

At least they were not problems like the A330's have :bored:

If it aint Boeing I aint going!

:cool:

drugs detected

3rd Jun 2010 04:23

WOW..... Go-Arounds, better than crashing!

AerocatS2A

3rd Jun 2010 04:24

Wow, two missed approaches and a cargo truck with a stuck throttle, what is the world coming to? :rolleyes:

Capt Kremin

3rd Jun 2010 04:40

With relation to the 3rd one, why does a go-around require an ASIR?

mr flappy

3rd Jun 2010 06:51

Every company I have worked for, go rounds were considered a normal procedure and therefore no report was required.
I worry if there is a company out there does require reports to be put in.
Maybe that Garuda pilot decided not to go around because he knew that he would have to put a report in and face having to explain himself to management, the result being substantial loss of life.

beer bong

3rd Jun 2010 07:24

FFS!

If we have to report go arounds it is seriously time to get out of this industry.
:ugh:

clear to land

3rd Jun 2010 07:39

You will find that worldwide, in the air transport role, it is a mandated state requirement to report all go-arounds on the applicable Air Safety Incident Report Form. The report is usually 'Go around performed due to preceding acft vacating late, or G/A performed due to stabilisation criteria not met etc'. This does not mean a G/A is considered abnormal, it is for trend analysis.:ok:

kellykelpie

3rd Jun 2010 08:02

Get a life Beaver

All times are GMT. The time now is 21:49.