Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

PPRuNe is famous, or is that infamous?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

PPRuNe is famous, or is that infamous?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th May 2003, 09:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 77
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post PPRuNe is famous, or is that infamous?

--------------------------------------------------------------
This story was printed from ZDNet Australia.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Study: mobile phones put planes at risk

May 05, 2003
URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/com...0274197,00.htm

The U.K.'s air safety regulator has released research about cell phone use on planes, warning of the serious effects that it can have on navigational equipment.

The Civil Aviation Authority research found that standard mobile phone use can cause a compass to freeze or to overshoot its actual magnetic bearing. Also, flight deck and navigation equipment indicators can be rendered unstable and inaccurate, and transmissions can interfere with critical audio outputs.

Mobile phone use has long been banned on airplanes, along with use of many other electrical devices. But passengers have often accused airlines of being over-officious in their enforcement of the ban, even suggesting that it is unnecessary. Many airlines have had experience of passengers who are willing to break the ban in order to make a call. This latest research may frighten passengers into compliance with the rules.

In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) bans the use of mobile phones on airplanes because of worries that calls could interfere with a plane's navigation system.

A number of anonymous posters on the Professional Pilots' Rumour Network--a popular online community for airline pilots and crew--expressed mixed feeling over the findings.

One poster said: "Occasionally during the taxi out, we overhear the characteristic rapid chirping of a mobile phone through our headsets. More often than not, it turns out to be a crew phone, we switch it off, then continue with no ill effects.

"Sometimes, however, it becomes necessary to hold clear of the runway and make (an announcement) reminding (passengers) to switch their phones off. At the very least, something back in the cabin is emitting enough of a signal to be picked up by the cockpit intercom. I think that once in a while I have observed deviations in some of the aircraft (navigation) kit while the interference is going on."

Another poster on the site expressed concerns over the issue, suggesting that it is almost impossible to ensure all mobile phones are switched off.

"If (the findings are) true, then we can never eliminate the possibility of an active phone on board by simply issuing instructions that all mobiles must be switched off. We either need a foolproof system of scanning for active phones (tricky because they can be 'quiet' for minutes at a time) or we need to 'harden' aircraft systems so this ceases to be a threat."
airsupport is offline  
Old 5th May 2003, 20:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: The Shire
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On this topic (I missed the original thread) do crew want ATC notification when mobile interference is heard on pilot transmissions? To crew ever hear mobile interference from ATC transmissions?
375ml is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.